{"title":"Prediction of individualised 6-month mortality risk in opioid use disorder.","authors":"Emmert Roberts,John Strang,Eve Taylor,Jamie Crummy,Tim Lowden,Chioma Amasiatu,Brian Eastwood","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.10313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPeople with opioid use disorder (OUD) have substantially higher standardised mortality rates compared with the general population. However, lack of individualised prognostic information presents challenges in personalisation of addiction treatment delivery.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nTo develop and validate the first prognostic models to estimate 6-month all-cause and drug-related mortality risk for people diagnosed with OUD using indicators recorded at baseline assessment in addiction services in England.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nThirteen candidate prognostic variables, including sociodemographic, injecting status and health and mental health factors, were identified from nationally linked addiction treatment, hospital admission and death records from 1 April 2013 to 1 April 2022. Multivariable Cox regression models were developed with a fractional polynomial approach for continuous variables, and missing data were addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Validation was undertaken using bootstrapping methods. Discrimination was assessed using Harrel's C and D statistics alongside examination of observed-to-predicted event rates and calibration curve slopes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nData were available for 236 064 people with OUD, with 2427 deaths due to any cause, including 1289 due to drug-related causes. Both final models demonstrated good optimism-adjusted discrimination and calibration, with all-cause and drug-related models, respectively, demonstrating Harrell's C statistics of 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.76), D-statistics of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.98-1.16) and calibration slopes of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.10).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe developed and internally validated Roberts' OUD mortality risk, with the first models to accurately quantify individualised absolute 6-month mortality risks in people with OUD presenting to addiction services. Independent validation is warranted to ensure these models have the optimal utility to assist wider future policy, commissioning and clinical decision-making.","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
People with opioid use disorder (OUD) have substantially higher standardised mortality rates compared with the general population. However, lack of individualised prognostic information presents challenges in personalisation of addiction treatment delivery.
AIMS
To develop and validate the first prognostic models to estimate 6-month all-cause and drug-related mortality risk for people diagnosed with OUD using indicators recorded at baseline assessment in addiction services in England.
METHOD
Thirteen candidate prognostic variables, including sociodemographic, injecting status and health and mental health factors, were identified from nationally linked addiction treatment, hospital admission and death records from 1 April 2013 to 1 April 2022. Multivariable Cox regression models were developed with a fractional polynomial approach for continuous variables, and missing data were addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Validation was undertaken using bootstrapping methods. Discrimination was assessed using Harrel's C and D statistics alongside examination of observed-to-predicted event rates and calibration curve slopes.
RESULTS
Data were available for 236 064 people with OUD, with 2427 deaths due to any cause, including 1289 due to drug-related causes. Both final models demonstrated good optimism-adjusted discrimination and calibration, with all-cause and drug-related models, respectively, demonstrating Harrell's C statistics of 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.76), D-statistics of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.98-1.16) and calibration slopes of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.10).
CONCLUSIONS
We developed and internally validated Roberts' OUD mortality risk, with the first models to accurately quantify individualised absolute 6-month mortality risks in people with OUD presenting to addiction services. Independent validation is warranted to ensure these models have the optimal utility to assist wider future policy, commissioning and clinical decision-making.
与一般人群相比,阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的标准化死亡率要高得多。然而,缺乏个性化的预后信息对成瘾治疗的个性化提供提出了挑战。目的:开发和验证第一个预后模型,利用英国成瘾服务机构基线评估记录的指标,估计诊断为OUD的人6个月的全因和药物相关死亡风险。方法从2013年4月1日至2022年4月1日的全国相关成瘾治疗、住院和死亡记录中确定13个候选预后变量,包括社会人口统计学、注射状况、健康和心理健康因素。对连续变量采用分数多项式方法建立了多变量Cox回归模型,并利用链式方程的多重插值解决了缺失数据。采用自举方法进行验证。使用Harrel的C和D统计数据以及观察到的预测事件率和校准曲线斜率来评估歧视。结果有236 064例OUD患者的数据,其中2427例因任何原因死亡,包括1289例因药物相关原因死亡。两种最终模型均表现出良好的乐观校正判别和校准,分别采用全因和药物相关模型,显示Harrell C统计量分别为0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75)和0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.76), d统计量分别为1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08)和1.07 (95% CI 0.98-1.16),校准斜率分别为1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08)和1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.10)。我们开发并内部验证了Roberts的OUD死亡率风险,第一个模型准确量化了向成瘾服务就诊的OUD患者的个体化6个月绝对死亡率风险。独立验证是必要的,以确保这些模型具有最佳效用,以协助更广泛的未来政策,调试和临床决策。