Prediction of individualised 6-month mortality risk in opioid use disorder.

Emmert Roberts,John Strang,Eve Taylor,Jamie Crummy,Tim Lowden,Chioma Amasiatu,Brian Eastwood
{"title":"Prediction of individualised 6-month mortality risk in opioid use disorder.","authors":"Emmert Roberts,John Strang,Eve Taylor,Jamie Crummy,Tim Lowden,Chioma Amasiatu,Brian Eastwood","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.10313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPeople with opioid use disorder (OUD) have substantially higher standardised mortality rates compared with the general population. However, lack of individualised prognostic information presents challenges in personalisation of addiction treatment delivery.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nTo develop and validate the first prognostic models to estimate 6-month all-cause and drug-related mortality risk for people diagnosed with OUD using indicators recorded at baseline assessment in addiction services in England.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nThirteen candidate prognostic variables, including sociodemographic, injecting status and health and mental health factors, were identified from nationally linked addiction treatment, hospital admission and death records from 1 April 2013 to 1 April 2022. Multivariable Cox regression models were developed with a fractional polynomial approach for continuous variables, and missing data were addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Validation was undertaken using bootstrapping methods. Discrimination was assessed using Harrel's C and D statistics alongside examination of observed-to-predicted event rates and calibration curve slopes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nData were available for 236 064 people with OUD, with 2427 deaths due to any cause, including 1289 due to drug-related causes. Both final models demonstrated good optimism-adjusted discrimination and calibration, with all-cause and drug-related models, respectively, demonstrating Harrell's C statistics of 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.76), D-statistics of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.98-1.16) and calibration slopes of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.10).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe developed and internally validated Roberts' OUD mortality risk, with the first models to accurately quantify individualised absolute 6-month mortality risks in people with OUD presenting to addiction services. Independent validation is warranted to ensure these models have the optimal utility to assist wider future policy, commissioning and clinical decision-making.","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND People with opioid use disorder (OUD) have substantially higher standardised mortality rates compared with the general population. However, lack of individualised prognostic information presents challenges in personalisation of addiction treatment delivery. AIMS To develop and validate the first prognostic models to estimate 6-month all-cause and drug-related mortality risk for people diagnosed with OUD using indicators recorded at baseline assessment in addiction services in England. METHOD Thirteen candidate prognostic variables, including sociodemographic, injecting status and health and mental health factors, were identified from nationally linked addiction treatment, hospital admission and death records from 1 April 2013 to 1 April 2022. Multivariable Cox regression models were developed with a fractional polynomial approach for continuous variables, and missing data were addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Validation was undertaken using bootstrapping methods. Discrimination was assessed using Harrel's C and D statistics alongside examination of observed-to-predicted event rates and calibration curve slopes. RESULTS Data were available for 236 064 people with OUD, with 2427 deaths due to any cause, including 1289 due to drug-related causes. Both final models demonstrated good optimism-adjusted discrimination and calibration, with all-cause and drug-related models, respectively, demonstrating Harrell's C statistics of 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.76), D-statistics of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.98-1.16) and calibration slopes of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.10). CONCLUSIONS We developed and internally validated Roberts' OUD mortality risk, with the first models to accurately quantify individualised absolute 6-month mortality risks in people with OUD presenting to addiction services. Independent validation is warranted to ensure these models have the optimal utility to assist wider future policy, commissioning and clinical decision-making.
阿片类药物使用障碍个体化6个月死亡风险预测
与一般人群相比,阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的标准化死亡率要高得多。然而,缺乏个性化的预后信息对成瘾治疗的个性化提供提出了挑战。目的:开发和验证第一个预后模型,利用英国成瘾服务机构基线评估记录的指标,估计诊断为OUD的人6个月的全因和药物相关死亡风险。方法从2013年4月1日至2022年4月1日的全国相关成瘾治疗、住院和死亡记录中确定13个候选预后变量,包括社会人口统计学、注射状况、健康和心理健康因素。对连续变量采用分数多项式方法建立了多变量Cox回归模型,并利用链式方程的多重插值解决了缺失数据。采用自举方法进行验证。使用Harrel的C和D统计数据以及观察到的预测事件率和校准曲线斜率来评估歧视。结果有236 064例OUD患者的数据,其中2427例因任何原因死亡,包括1289例因药物相关原因死亡。两种最终模型均表现出良好的乐观校正判别和校准,分别采用全因和药物相关模型,显示Harrell C统计量分别为0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75)和0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.76), d统计量分别为1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08)和1.07 (95% CI 0.98-1.16),校准斜率分别为1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.08)和1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.10)。我们开发并内部验证了Roberts的OUD死亡率风险,第一个模型准确量化了向成瘾服务就诊的OUD患者的个体化6个月绝对死亡率风险。独立验证是必要的,以确保这些模型具有最佳效用,以协助更广泛的未来政策,调试和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信