Burning emotions: taxonomy of acid attacks in Cambodia and the cultural construction of jealousy and envy.

Maurice Eisenbruch
{"title":"Burning emotions: taxonomy of acid attacks in Cambodia and the cultural construction of jealousy and envy.","authors":"Maurice Eisenbruch","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.10306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAcid attacks, a harrowing form of violence often involving intimate partners, are prevalent in South and South-East Asia and are on the rise in the global north. There are major psychosocial and mental health sequelae for survivors and their families.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nThis ethnographic study, set in Cambodia, aims to identify the cultural and emotional dynamics surrounding acid attacks. The objectives are to define a taxonomy of acid attacks through the identification of the patterns of attack in intimate relations, and to explore the subjective experience of the informants to elucidate the cultural context of the complex emotions of jealousy and envy.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nOver 2 decades, ethnographic fieldwork was conducted with 87 survivors and their families and perpetrators in rural and urban Cambodia. Qualitative analysis was used to identify the taxa and enable a cultural understanding of the attacks.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThree taxa were identified. (a) The most prevalent pattern (n = 56) was driven by romantic jealousy, fuelled by perceived infidelity in the context of an explicit 'love triangle' involving a married couple and a rival. (b) The second was intimate partner violence (n = 18), for example, a possessive husband maiming his wife after she had fled the coercive control of an abusive marriage. And (c) the last involved attacks within the community (n = 13), perpetrated acts of envy and vengefulness often arising from disputes and pointing at dysfunctional conflict resolution mechanisms.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAcid attacks are a grotesque example of direct violence that leads to severe mental health consequences, including suicidal ideation. The taxa reveal, 'inside out', the cultural construction of the causes and consequences of attacks while demonstrating the cultural architecture of envy and romantic jealousy. This study is relevant to transcultural psychiatry and global health, with implications for culturally responsive psychiatric intervention informed by the intrapsychic, interpersonal and structural dimensions of violence.","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Acid attacks, a harrowing form of violence often involving intimate partners, are prevalent in South and South-East Asia and are on the rise in the global north. There are major psychosocial and mental health sequelae for survivors and their families. AIMS This ethnographic study, set in Cambodia, aims to identify the cultural and emotional dynamics surrounding acid attacks. The objectives are to define a taxonomy of acid attacks through the identification of the patterns of attack in intimate relations, and to explore the subjective experience of the informants to elucidate the cultural context of the complex emotions of jealousy and envy. METHOD Over 2 decades, ethnographic fieldwork was conducted with 87 survivors and their families and perpetrators in rural and urban Cambodia. Qualitative analysis was used to identify the taxa and enable a cultural understanding of the attacks. RESULTS Three taxa were identified. (a) The most prevalent pattern (n = 56) was driven by romantic jealousy, fuelled by perceived infidelity in the context of an explicit 'love triangle' involving a married couple and a rival. (b) The second was intimate partner violence (n = 18), for example, a possessive husband maiming his wife after she had fled the coercive control of an abusive marriage. And (c) the last involved attacks within the community (n = 13), perpetrated acts of envy and vengefulness often arising from disputes and pointing at dysfunctional conflict resolution mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS Acid attacks are a grotesque example of direct violence that leads to severe mental health consequences, including suicidal ideation. The taxa reveal, 'inside out', the cultural construction of the causes and consequences of attacks while demonstrating the cultural architecture of envy and romantic jealousy. This study is relevant to transcultural psychiatry and global health, with implications for culturally responsive psychiatric intervention informed by the intrapsychic, interpersonal and structural dimensions of violence.
燃烧的情绪:柬埔寨硫酸袭击的分类和嫉妒和嫉妒的文化建构。
硫酸袭击是一种令人痛心的暴力形式,通常涉及亲密伴侣,在南亚和东南亚很普遍,在全球北方呈上升趋势。对幸存者及其家属有严重的心理社会和精神健康后遗症。目的:这项以柬埔寨为背景的民族志研究,旨在确定围绕硫酸袭击的文化和情感动态。目的是通过识别亲密关系中的攻击模式来定义酸攻击的分类,并探索举报人的主观经验,以阐明嫉妒和嫉妒的复杂情绪的文化背景。方法20多年来,在柬埔寨农村和城市对87名幸存者及其家属和肇事者进行了民族志实地调查。定性分析用于识别分类群,并对攻击进行文化理解。结果鉴定出3个分类群。(a)最普遍的模式(n = 56)是由浪漫的嫉妒驱动的,在一个明确的“三角恋”背景下,一对已婚夫妇和一个竞争对手的不忠行为加剧了这种不忠行为。(b)第二种是亲密伴侣暴力(n = 18),例如,占有欲强的丈夫在妻子逃离虐待婚姻的强制控制后使她致残。(c)最后一种涉及社区内的攻击(n = 13),通常由争端引起的嫉妒和报复行为,指向功能失调的冲突解决机制。硫酸袭击是直接暴力的怪诞例子,会导致严重的精神健康后果,包括自杀意念。该分类群“从内到外”揭示了攻击的原因和后果的文化结构,同时展示了嫉妒和浪漫嫉妒的文化结构。本研究与跨文化精神病学和全球健康相关,对心理内、人际关系和暴力的结构维度所告知的文化反应性精神病学干预具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信