Long-term Outcomes of a Contemporary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Technique in Patients With Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.

Anh Do,Markus Scheibel,Philipp Moroder,Agahan Hayta,Isil Akgun Demir,Alp Paksoy,Doruk Akgün
{"title":"Long-term Outcomes of a Contemporary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Technique in Patients With Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Anh Do,Markus Scheibel,Philipp Moroder,Agahan Hayta,Isil Akgun Demir,Alp Paksoy,Doruk Akgün","doi":"10.1177/03635465251351293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair are poorly reported in the literature and show recurrence rates as high as 37%. However, this high failure rate is based on historical studies of patients with critical defects stabilized using older techniques.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair using a contemporary technique with a minimum of 3 suture anchors in patients with traumatic anterior instability and to assess possible risk factors for recurrent instability.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nCase series; Level of evidence, 4.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 181 patients (182 shoulders), who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair because of traumatic anterior instability between 2005 and 2014, were included in this study and evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Exclusion criteria were previous shoulder surgery, additional stabilization procedures, use of <3 anchors, multidirectional instability, and indications for bony reconstruction (critical bony defects: glenoid defect >20%, off-track Hill-Sachs lesion). The primary outcome was recurrent instability. Secondary outcomes were the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS), Constant score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), and Rowe score as well as sports activity level and return to sports. Risk factors for recurrent instability were analyzed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe overall recurrence rate was 20.9% at a mean follow-up of 13.8 ± 2.8 years. Age ≤20 years at the time of surgery was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (P = .007). The failure rate was lower in patients who underwent surgery after the first-time dislocation (8/58 [13.8%]) compared with patients who underwent surgery after multiple instability events (30/124 [24.2%]), although this was not statistically significant (P = .108). Patients without recurrent instability had statistically significant better scores on the SSV (P < .001), VAS for pain during movements (P = .016), Constant score (P = .011), WOSI (P = .001), and Rowe score (P < .001) compared with patients with recurrence without revision surgery. A shorter interval between the first dislocation and surgery was associated with better shoulder outcomes, despite a consistent recurrence rate. Of all patients, 97.6% returned to sports, with 69.6% returning to 90% to 100% of their preoperative sports activity.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nArthroscopic Bankart repair resulted in a relatively high recurrence rate, despite the use of a contemporary technique, particularly in patients with >1 dislocation before surgery. While younger age and a higher number of preoperative dislocations were potential risk factors for recurrence, a shorter interval between the first dislocation and surgery was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Therefore, patients with a high risk of redislocations should be considered for early soft tissue stabilization, while additional procedures such as remplissage should be performed for those with nonmodifiable high-risk factors.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"3635465251351293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251351293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair are poorly reported in the literature and show recurrence rates as high as 37%. However, this high failure rate is based on historical studies of patients with critical defects stabilized using older techniques. PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair using a contemporary technique with a minimum of 3 suture anchors in patients with traumatic anterior instability and to assess possible risk factors for recurrent instability. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A total of 181 patients (182 shoulders), who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair because of traumatic anterior instability between 2005 and 2014, were included in this study and evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Exclusion criteria were previous shoulder surgery, additional stabilization procedures, use of <3 anchors, multidirectional instability, and indications for bony reconstruction (critical bony defects: glenoid defect >20%, off-track Hill-Sachs lesion). The primary outcome was recurrent instability. Secondary outcomes were the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS), Constant score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), and Rowe score as well as sports activity level and return to sports. Risk factors for recurrent instability were analyzed. RESULTS The overall recurrence rate was 20.9% at a mean follow-up of 13.8 ± 2.8 years. Age ≤20 years at the time of surgery was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (P = .007). The failure rate was lower in patients who underwent surgery after the first-time dislocation (8/58 [13.8%]) compared with patients who underwent surgery after multiple instability events (30/124 [24.2%]), although this was not statistically significant (P = .108). Patients without recurrent instability had statistically significant better scores on the SSV (P < .001), VAS for pain during movements (P = .016), Constant score (P = .011), WOSI (P = .001), and Rowe score (P < .001) compared with patients with recurrence without revision surgery. A shorter interval between the first dislocation and surgery was associated with better shoulder outcomes, despite a consistent recurrence rate. Of all patients, 97.6% returned to sports, with 69.6% returning to 90% to 100% of their preoperative sports activity. CONCLUSION Arthroscopic Bankart repair resulted in a relatively high recurrence rate, despite the use of a contemporary technique, particularly in patients with >1 dislocation before surgery. While younger age and a higher number of preoperative dislocations were potential risk factors for recurrence, a shorter interval between the first dislocation and surgery was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Therefore, patients with a high risk of redislocations should be considered for early soft tissue stabilization, while additional procedures such as remplissage should be performed for those with nonmodifiable high-risk factors.
当代关节镜下Bankart修复技术治疗外伤性前肩不稳患者的长期疗效:至少10年随访。
关节镜下Bankart修复的长期结果在文献中报道很少,复发率高达37%。然而,这种高失败率是基于使用旧技术稳定严重缺陷患者的历史研究。目的:评价外伤性前路不稳患者采用至少3个缝线锚钉进行关节镜下Bankart修复的长期临床效果,并评估复发性前路不稳的可能危险因素。研究设计案例系列;证据等级,4级。方法本研究共纳入了2005年至2014年间因外伤性前路不稳定而接受关节镜Bankart修复的181例患者(182例肩关节),并在至少10年的随访中进行了评估。排除标准为既往肩部手术、额外的稳定手术、使用20%、偏离轨道的Hill-Sachs病变)。主要结局是复发性不稳定。次要结果是主观肩值(SSV)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、常数评分、西安大略省肩部不稳定指数(WOSI)、Rowe评分以及体育活动水平和重返运动。分析复发性不稳定的危险因素。结果总复发率为20.9%,平均随访13.8±2.8年。手术时年龄≤20岁与较高的复发风险相关(P = .007)。首次脱位后手术的失败率(8/58[13.8%])低于多次不稳定事件后手术的患者(30/124[24.2%]),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.108)。与没有翻修手术的复发患者相比,没有复发不稳定的患者在SSV评分(P < 0.001)、运动疼痛VAS评分(P = 0.016)、Constant评分(P = 0.011)、WOSI评分(P = 0.001)和Rowe评分(P < 0.001)上的得分均有统计学意义。尽管复发率一致,但第一次脱位和手术之间的时间间隔越短,肩关节预后越好。在所有患者中,97.6%的患者恢复了运动,其中69.6%的患者恢复了术前90%至100%的运动。结论尽管采用了现代技术,关节镜下Bankart修复术的复发率相对较高,尤其是术前bbb1脱位患者。虽然年龄较小和术前脱位数量较多是复发的潜在危险因素,但首次脱位与手术之间较短的间隔与改善的临床结果相关。因此,对于再脱位风险高的患者,应考虑早期进行软组织稳定,而对于那些具有不可改变的高危因素的患者,应进行其他手术,如再脱位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信