"What Do We Do Now?": Recommendations to Combat Professionals' Public Stigma Against Women Who Experience Intimate Partner Violence.

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lara Murvartian,Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías
{"title":"\"What Do We Do Now?\": Recommendations to Combat Professionals' Public Stigma Against Women Who Experience Intimate Partner Violence.","authors":"Lara Murvartian,Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03156-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professionals' public stigma toward intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) survivors represents a significant barrier to the recovery from violence. The aim was to analyze the actions that professionals working in various sectors involved in integrated care consider relevant to preventing professionals' stigma. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 professionals working in Spain. A thematic analysis was employed. The recommendations suggested by the participants were divided into two main themes: actions to prevent stigma in society and actions to prevent stigma among professionals. The latter were further divided into individual-level actions and structural-level actions. Among the actions to prevent stigma in society, emphasis was placed on promoting gender equality in a cross-cutting manner. At the structural level, some of the suggestions were to provide institutions with resources and protocols to provide IPVAW-specialized services and to ensure competent professionals through effective training and community workspaces to facilitate group discussions and supervision, among other actions. Additionally, evaluating the real effectiveness of psychosocial intervention programs targeting survivors was suggested. At the individual level, professionals should engage in self-reflection regarding their own stigma and refer to other colleagues when necessary. A survivor-centered intervention model was also advocated, which seeks to empower women and is based on the strengths of survivors and healthy relationships. This also implied that social intervention professionals should address IPVAW before considering the removal of minors. This study offers relevant recommendations to combat the stigma at all levels, contributing to high-quality professional care for survivors.","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"685 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03156-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professionals' public stigma toward intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) survivors represents a significant barrier to the recovery from violence. The aim was to analyze the actions that professionals working in various sectors involved in integrated care consider relevant to preventing professionals' stigma. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 professionals working in Spain. A thematic analysis was employed. The recommendations suggested by the participants were divided into two main themes: actions to prevent stigma in society and actions to prevent stigma among professionals. The latter were further divided into individual-level actions and structural-level actions. Among the actions to prevent stigma in society, emphasis was placed on promoting gender equality in a cross-cutting manner. At the structural level, some of the suggestions were to provide institutions with resources and protocols to provide IPVAW-specialized services and to ensure competent professionals through effective training and community workspaces to facilitate group discussions and supervision, among other actions. Additionally, evaluating the real effectiveness of psychosocial intervention programs targeting survivors was suggested. At the individual level, professionals should engage in self-reflection regarding their own stigma and refer to other colleagues when necessary. A survivor-centered intervention model was also advocated, which seeks to empower women and is based on the strengths of survivors and healthy relationships. This also implied that social intervention professionals should address IPVAW before considering the removal of minors. This study offers relevant recommendations to combat the stigma at all levels, contributing to high-quality professional care for survivors.
“我们现在该怎么办?”:关于打击专业人员对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女的公开污名的建议。
专业人员对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女幸存者的公开污名是从暴力中恢复的一个重大障碍。目的是分析参与综合护理的各个部门的专业人员认为与预防专业人员污名相关的行动。对25名在西班牙工作的专业人士进行了半结构化的深度访谈。采用了专题分析。与会者提出的建议分为两个主题:防止社会污名化的行动和防止专业人员污名化的行动。后者又进一步分为个人层面的行为和结构层面的行为。在防止社会污名化的行动中,强调以跨领域的方式促进两性平等。在结构一级,一些建议是向机构提供资源和协议,以提供ipvaw专门服务,并通过有效的培训和社区工作空间确保有能力的专业人员,以促进小组讨论和监督,以及其他行动。此外,建议评估针对幸存者的心理社会干预计划的实际效果。在个人层面上,专业人士应该对自己的耻辱进行自我反思,并在必要时向其他同事求助。还提倡以幸存者为中心的干预模式,力求赋予妇女权力,并以幸存者的力量和健康的关系为基础。这也意味着社会干预专业人员应该在考虑移除未成年人之前解决IPVAW问题。这项研究提供了相关的建议,在各个层面上打击耻辱,有助于为幸存者提供高质量的专业护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信