Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Positive Individuals: Prevalence, Predictors, and Root-Cause Analysis in a Nationwide Cohort.

Natalie Wilson,Mohammad Bilal,Anders Westanmo,Rahul Karna,Amy Gravely,Aasma Shaukat
{"title":"Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Positive Individuals: Prevalence, Predictors, and Root-Cause Analysis in a Nationwide Cohort.","authors":"Natalie Wilson,Mohammad Bilal,Anders Westanmo,Rahul Karna,Amy Gravely,Aasma Shaukat","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nPost-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) represents an important real-world colonoscopy quality indicator. Using a national database, we evaluated predictors of PCCRC in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals, determined the PCCRC 3-year rate (PCCRC-3y), and performed a root cause analysis (RCA).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective cohort study evaluated FIT-positive patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2015 to July 2022. Data was collected from the Veterans Affairs (VA) national database. PCCRC was defined as CRC detected ≥6 months after colonoscopy. CRC was identified using SNOMED codes and the VA Cancer Registry. The World Endoscopy Organization methodology was used to perform the RCA and calculate the PCCRC-3y rate.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe identified 132 PCCRCs among 52,167 FIT-positive individuals. The PCCRC-3y rate was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.0-7.7%). PCCRC locations were proximal colon (43.2%), distal colon (34.8%), and rectum (22%). Root causes were likely new CRC (17.4%), missed lesions with adequate (31.2%) or inadequate (9.8%) examination, incomplete polyp resection (22%), and detected but unresected lesions (19.7%). 16.7% of patients with PCCRC had poor bowel preparation on index colonoscopy. The cecal intubation rate was 88.6% and rectal retroflexion rate was 84.5%. In 14.4% of cases, recommended surveillance intervals did not adhere to established guidelines. Independent predictors of PCCRC were ages 70-79 (HR 7.86; 95% CI, 1.08-57.39), age ≥80 (HR 10.18; 95% CI, 1.06-97.98), tubulovillous adenoma (HR 3.98; 95% CI, 2.52-6.29), and adenoma with high-grade dysplasia (HR 10.15; 95% CI, 5.91-17.42).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAmong FIT-positive individuals, the PCCRC-3y rate was 6.4%, with missed lesions and incomplete resection as key contributors. These findings provide useful information on quality metrics in FIT-based CRC screening programs.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) represents an important real-world colonoscopy quality indicator. Using a national database, we evaluated predictors of PCCRC in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals, determined the PCCRC 3-year rate (PCCRC-3y), and performed a root cause analysis (RCA). METHODS This retrospective cohort study evaluated FIT-positive patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2015 to July 2022. Data was collected from the Veterans Affairs (VA) national database. PCCRC was defined as CRC detected ≥6 months after colonoscopy. CRC was identified using SNOMED codes and the VA Cancer Registry. The World Endoscopy Organization methodology was used to perform the RCA and calculate the PCCRC-3y rate. RESULTS We identified 132 PCCRCs among 52,167 FIT-positive individuals. The PCCRC-3y rate was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.0-7.7%). PCCRC locations were proximal colon (43.2%), distal colon (34.8%), and rectum (22%). Root causes were likely new CRC (17.4%), missed lesions with adequate (31.2%) or inadequate (9.8%) examination, incomplete polyp resection (22%), and detected but unresected lesions (19.7%). 16.7% of patients with PCCRC had poor bowel preparation on index colonoscopy. The cecal intubation rate was 88.6% and rectal retroflexion rate was 84.5%. In 14.4% of cases, recommended surveillance intervals did not adhere to established guidelines. Independent predictors of PCCRC were ages 70-79 (HR 7.86; 95% CI, 1.08-57.39), age ≥80 (HR 10.18; 95% CI, 1.06-97.98), tubulovillous adenoma (HR 3.98; 95% CI, 2.52-6.29), and adenoma with high-grade dysplasia (HR 10.15; 95% CI, 5.91-17.42). CONCLUSIONS Among FIT-positive individuals, the PCCRC-3y rate was 6.4%, with missed lesions and incomplete resection as key contributors. These findings provide useful information on quality metrics in FIT-based CRC screening programs.
结肠镜检查后粪便免疫化学测试阳性个体的结直肠癌:全国队列的患病率、预测因素和根本原因分析。
目的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRC)是现实生活中重要的结肠镜检查质量指标。使用国家数据库,我们评估了粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)阳性个体中PCCRC的预测因素,确定了PCCRC 3年发生率(PCCRC-3y),并进行了根本原因分析(RCA)。方法本回顾性队列研究评估2015年1月至2022年7月接受结肠镜检查的fit阳性患者。数据是从退伍军人事务(VA)国家数据库中收集的。PCCRC定义为结肠镜检查后≥6个月检测到的结直肠癌。使用SNOMED代码和VA癌症登记处识别CRC。采用世界内窥镜组织的方法进行RCA并计算PCCRC-3y率。结果在52167例fit阳性个体中鉴定出132例pccrc。PCCRC-3y发生率为6.4% (95% CI, 5.0-7.7%)。PCCRC部位为近端结肠(43.2%)、远端结肠(34.8%)和直肠(22%)。根本原因可能是新发结直肠癌(17.4%)、检查不充分(31.2%)或检查不充分(9.8%)、息肉切除不完全(22%)和已发现但未切除的病变(19.7%)。16.7%的PCCRC患者在指数结肠镜检查时肠道准备不良。盲肠插管率为88.6%,直肠后伸率为84.5%。在14.4%的病例中,推荐的监测间隔没有遵循既定的指导方针。PCCRC的独立预测因子为70-79岁(HR 7.86;95% CI, 1.08-57.39),年龄≥80岁(HR 10.18;95% CI, 1.06-97.98),管状绒毛腺瘤(HR 3.98;95% CI, 2.52-6.29)和腺瘤伴高度不典型增生(HR 10.15;95% ci, 5.91-17.42)。结论在fit阳性个体中,PCCRC-3y发生率为6.4%,其中病灶遗漏和不完全切除是主要因素。这些发现为基于fit的CRC筛查项目的质量指标提供了有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信