Translation and Cross-cultural Validation of the Flourishing and Secure Flourishing Indexes in the Brazilian Portuguese language.

Juliane P de B Gonçalves, Marianna de Abreu Costa, Neusa Sica Da Rocha, Gisele Manfro, Willyane de Andrade Alvarenga, Alexander Moreira-Almeida, Bruno Mosqueiro Paz, Marcelo Fleck, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Homero Vallada
{"title":"Translation and Cross-cultural Validation of the Flourishing and Secure Flourishing Indexes in the Brazilian Portuguese language.","authors":"Juliane P de B Gonçalves, Marianna de Abreu Costa, Neusa Sica Da Rocha, Gisele Manfro, Willyane de Andrade Alvarenga, Alexander Moreira-Almeida, Bruno Mosqueiro Paz, Marcelo Fleck, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Homero Vallada","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Flourishing, a holistic concept encompassing multiple domains of well-being, has gained significant interest in recent years. However, validated tools for measuring flourishing, mainly using VanderWeele's framework, remain unavailable for Brazilian Portuguese-speaking populations. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Flourishing Index (FI) and Secure Flourishing Index (SFI) for the Brazilian Portuguese language through two complementary studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The instruments were translated and culturally adapted, following international guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of Self-Report Measures. In Study 1, psychometric properties were examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in a general population sample (n = 359). Construct validity was assessed by correlating FI/SFI scores with quality of life, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic growth. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted in a sample of individuals with moderate depressive symptoms (n = 252) to confirm the factor structure. Reliability and validity were evaluated in both samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA identified a five-factor structure for FI and a six-factor structure for SFI, consistent with prior studies. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.60 to 0.86, supporting internal consistency. CFA confirmed the multidimensional structures with appropriate fit indices (RMSEA<0.08, SRMR<0.08). Construct validity analyses demonstrated significant correlations between FI/SFI and mental health, quality of life, and post-traumatic growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FI and SFI demonstrated appropriate psychometric properties in the Brazilian Portuguese language, enabling comprehensive assessments of flourishing in diverse contexts. These validated tools can support flourishing research and intervention evaluation in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":520767,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Flourishing, a holistic concept encompassing multiple domains of well-being, has gained significant interest in recent years. However, validated tools for measuring flourishing, mainly using VanderWeele's framework, remain unavailable for Brazilian Portuguese-speaking populations. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Flourishing Index (FI) and Secure Flourishing Index (SFI) for the Brazilian Portuguese language through two complementary studies.

Methods: The instruments were translated and culturally adapted, following international guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of Self-Report Measures. In Study 1, psychometric properties were examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in a general population sample (n = 359). Construct validity was assessed by correlating FI/SFI scores with quality of life, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic growth. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted in a sample of individuals with moderate depressive symptoms (n = 252) to confirm the factor structure. Reliability and validity were evaluated in both samples.

Results: EFA identified a five-factor structure for FI and a six-factor structure for SFI, consistent with prior studies. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.60 to 0.86, supporting internal consistency. CFA confirmed the multidimensional structures with appropriate fit indices (RMSEA<0.08, SRMR<0.08). Construct validity analyses demonstrated significant correlations between FI/SFI and mental health, quality of life, and post-traumatic growth.

Conclusion: The FI and SFI demonstrated appropriate psychometric properties in the Brazilian Portuguese language, enabling comprehensive assessments of flourishing in diverse contexts. These validated tools can support flourishing research and intervention evaluation in Brazil.

巴西葡萄牙语中繁荣与安全繁荣指数的翻译与跨文化验证。
目标:繁荣,一个包含多个幸福领域的整体概念,近年来获得了极大的兴趣。然而,衡量繁荣的有效工具(主要使用VanderWeele的框架)仍然无法用于巴西葡语人口。本研究旨在通过两项互补研究,对巴西葡萄牙语的繁荣指数(FI)和安全繁荣指数(SFI)进行翻译、文化适应和验证。方法:根据自我报告量表跨文化适应的国际指南,对这些工具进行翻译和文化适应。在研究1中,使用探索性因素分析(EFA)对一般人群样本(n = 359)的心理测量特性进行了检查。通过FI/SFI评分与生活质量、抑郁、焦虑和创伤后成长的相关性来评估结构效度。研究2采用验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA)对252名中度抑郁症状的个体样本进行验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA),以确认因子结构。对两个样本进行了信度和效度评估。结果:EFA确定了FI的五因素结构和SFI的六因素结构,与先前的研究一致。Cronbach's alpha在0.60 ~ 0.86之间,支持内部一致性。结论:FI和SFI在巴西葡萄牙语中表现出适当的心理测量特性,能够在不同的背景下对繁荣进行综合评估。这些经过验证的工具可以支持巴西蓬勃发展的研究和干预评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信