Insertional anatomy of horizontal rectus extraocular muscles in patients with Esotropia and Exotropia.

Yun Wen, Tao Shen, Jianhua Yan
{"title":"Insertional anatomy of horizontal rectus extraocular muscles in patients with Esotropia and Exotropia.","authors":"Yun Wen, Tao Shen, Jianhua Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06898-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Strabismus, including esotropia and exotropia, significantly affects binocular vision and presents challenges in clinical management and surgical correction. Although previous studies have explored the anatomical characteristics of horizontal rectus extraocular muscles (EOMs) in strabismus, large-scale analyses of insertional anatomy remain limited. This study investigates anatomical variations in the insertions of horizontal rectus EOMs in patients with esotropia and exotropia, aiming to understand their impact on strabismus management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted using clinical records from 4781 patients diagnosed with strabismus who underwent surgery at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, from June 2014 to August 2020. Anatomical measurements of horizontal rectus EOM insertions were taken using a Castroviejo caliper. Statistical analyses, including regression analysis, were performed to examine the relationship between EOM characteristics and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant anatomical differences were observed among esotropia, exotropia, and control groups. Esotropia patients exhibited shorter medial rectus (MR) insertion distances (mean: 4.81 mm) than both exotropia (5.09 mm) and controls (5.08 mm, p < 0.001), with moderate effect sizes. Exotropia subtypes showed wider MR and lateral rectus (LR) insertions, particularly in constant and pattern types (MR width p = 0.001, LR width p = 0.002). Regression analysis indicated that shorter MR insertion distance was significantly associated with greater esodeviation at both near (β = -13.60, p < 0.001) and distance (β = -12.76, p < 0.001), though with small effect sizes. Refractive error (SE) and age were also significant predictors of deviation magnitude and AC/A ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anatomical variations in the horizontal rectus EOMs are significantly associated with esotropia and exotropia. These findings enhance our understanding of strabismus pathophysiology and may help guide surgical strategies for severe cases, though further research is needed to refine clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":520634,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06898-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Strabismus, including esotropia and exotropia, significantly affects binocular vision and presents challenges in clinical management and surgical correction. Although previous studies have explored the anatomical characteristics of horizontal rectus extraocular muscles (EOMs) in strabismus, large-scale analyses of insertional anatomy remain limited. This study investigates anatomical variations in the insertions of horizontal rectus EOMs in patients with esotropia and exotropia, aiming to understand their impact on strabismus management.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted using clinical records from 4781 patients diagnosed with strabismus who underwent surgery at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, from June 2014 to August 2020. Anatomical measurements of horizontal rectus EOM insertions were taken using a Castroviejo caliper. Statistical analyses, including regression analysis, were performed to examine the relationship between EOM characteristics and clinical outcomes.

Results: Significant anatomical differences were observed among esotropia, exotropia, and control groups. Esotropia patients exhibited shorter medial rectus (MR) insertion distances (mean: 4.81 mm) than both exotropia (5.09 mm) and controls (5.08 mm, p < 0.001), with moderate effect sizes. Exotropia subtypes showed wider MR and lateral rectus (LR) insertions, particularly in constant and pattern types (MR width p = 0.001, LR width p = 0.002). Regression analysis indicated that shorter MR insertion distance was significantly associated with greater esodeviation at both near (β = -13.60, p < 0.001) and distance (β = -12.76, p < 0.001), though with small effect sizes. Refractive error (SE) and age were also significant predictors of deviation magnitude and AC/A ratio.

Conclusion: Anatomical variations in the horizontal rectus EOMs are significantly associated with esotropia and exotropia. These findings enhance our understanding of strabismus pathophysiology and may help guide surgical strategies for severe cases, though further research is needed to refine clinical applications.

内斜视和外斜视患者水平直肌眼外肌插入解剖。
目的:斜视,包括内斜视和外斜视,严重影响双眼视力,给临床治疗和手术矫正带来挑战。虽然以前的研究已经探讨了斜视中水平直肌眼外肌(EOMs)的解剖特征,但对插入解剖的大规模分析仍然有限。本研究探讨了内斜视和外斜视患者水平直肌EOMs插入的解剖学变化,旨在了解它们对斜视治疗的影响。方法:对2014年6月至2020年8月中山大学中山眼科中心4781例斜视手术患者的临床资料进行回顾性病例对照研究。使用Castroviejo卡尺进行水平直肌EOM插入的解剖测量。统计分析,包括回归分析,检验EOM特征与临床结果之间的关系。结果:内斜视组、外斜视组与对照组在解剖学上存在显著差异。内斜视患者内侧直肌(MR)插入距离(平均:4.81 mm)短于外斜视(5.09 mm)和对照组(5.08 mm)。结论:水平直肌EOMs的解剖变异与内斜视和外斜视有显著关系。这些发现增强了我们对斜视病理生理的理解,并可能有助于指导严重病例的手术策略,尽管需要进一步的研究来完善临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信