Depression and anxiety in empty nose syndrome: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Anuja H Shah, Isabelle J Chau, Shaun A Nguyen, Alexander N Duffy, Zachary M Soler, Rodney J Schlosser
{"title":"Depression and anxiety in empty nose syndrome: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Anuja H Shah, Isabelle J Chau, Shaun A Nguyen, Alexander N Duffy, Zachary M Soler, Rodney J Schlosser","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09535-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empty nose syndrome (ENS) is a condition characterized by a persistent feeling of nasal obstruction despite having a patent nasal airway. This study aims to understand prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with ENS and the impact of augmentation procedures on psychological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature was searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Outcome measures were collected for mental health prevalences and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1056 abstracts identified, 11 studies (N = 401 patients) were included. Among patients with ENS, prevalences of depression and anxiety were 76.6% (95%CI: 61.0-89.1) and 77.0% (95% CI: 49.9-95.5). The prevalence of depression in patients with ENS was significantly increased compared to that of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) (RR: 2.8 [95%CI: 1.5-5.2], p = 0.001) in studies which compared both conditions. In patients who underwent augmentation, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 showed no significant improvement at 6-month follow-up (5.39 [95%CI: -0.7-11.5], p = 0.08; 5.45 [95%CI: -2.8-13.7], p = 0.20) while Beck Depression Inventory-II and Beck Anxiety Inventory showed significant improvement at 6-month follow-up (11.94 [95%CI: 8.7-15.2], p < 0.00001; 10.83 [95%CI: 7.7-14.], p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depression and anxiety are common among patients with ENS, with a possible increased prevalence of depression in patients with ENS compared to those with CRS. Patients with ENS demonstrated inconsistent improvement in depression and anxiety scores following augmentation procedures depending on the PROMs utilized. As patients with ENS often have mental health comorbidities, further research should investigate whether anxiety and depression are true sequelae of ENS or factors contributing to its development.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09535-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Empty nose syndrome (ENS) is a condition characterized by a persistent feeling of nasal obstruction despite having a patent nasal airway. This study aims to understand prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with ENS and the impact of augmentation procedures on psychological symptoms.

Methods: The literature was searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Outcome measures were collected for mental health prevalences and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs).

Results: Of 1056 abstracts identified, 11 studies (N = 401 patients) were included. Among patients with ENS, prevalences of depression and anxiety were 76.6% (95%CI: 61.0-89.1) and 77.0% (95% CI: 49.9-95.5). The prevalence of depression in patients with ENS was significantly increased compared to that of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) (RR: 2.8 [95%CI: 1.5-5.2], p = 0.001) in studies which compared both conditions. In patients who underwent augmentation, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 showed no significant improvement at 6-month follow-up (5.39 [95%CI: -0.7-11.5], p = 0.08; 5.45 [95%CI: -2.8-13.7], p = 0.20) while Beck Depression Inventory-II and Beck Anxiety Inventory showed significant improvement at 6-month follow-up (11.94 [95%CI: 8.7-15.2], p < 0.00001; 10.83 [95%CI: 7.7-14.], p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Depression and anxiety are common among patients with ENS, with a possible increased prevalence of depression in patients with ENS compared to those with CRS. Patients with ENS demonstrated inconsistent improvement in depression and anxiety scores following augmentation procedures depending on the PROMs utilized. As patients with ENS often have mental health comorbidities, further research should investigate whether anxiety and depression are true sequelae of ENS or factors contributing to its development.

空鼻综合征的抑郁和焦虑:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:空鼻综合征(ENS)是一种尽管鼻导气管通畅,但仍持续感觉鼻塞的疾病。本研究旨在了解ENS患者抑郁和焦虑的患病率,以及隆胸手术对心理症状的影响。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行文献检索。结果测量收集了心理健康患病率和患者相关结果测量(PROMs)。结果:在1056篇摘要中,纳入了11项研究(N = 401例患者)。在ENS患者中,抑郁和焦虑的患病率分别为76.6% (95%CI: 61.0-89.1)和77.0% (95%CI: 49.9-95.5)。在比较两种情况的研究中,ENS患者的抑郁患病率明显高于慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)患者(RR: 2.8 [95%CI: 1.5-5.2], p = 0.001)。在接受增强治疗的患者中,患者健康问卷-9和广泛性焦虑障碍-7在6个月的随访中没有显着改善(5.39 [95%CI: -0.7-11.5], p = 0.08;5.45 [95%CI: -2.8-13.7], p = 0.20),而Beck抑郁量表- ii和Beck焦虑量表在6个月的随访中显示显著改善(11.94 [95%CI: 8.7-15.2], p结论:ENS患者中抑郁和焦虑是常见的,与CRS患者相比,ENS患者抑郁患病率可能增加。根据所使用的PROMs, ENS患者在增强手术后表现出不一致的抑郁和焦虑评分改善。由于ENS患者经常有精神健康合并症,进一步的研究应该调查焦虑和抑郁是否是ENS的真正后遗症,还是促成其发展的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信