Mathematical analysis of gamma index on pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance with octavius 4D rotational phantom for 2d and 3d space.

IF 1.3
Shilpa Tiwari, Vindhyavasini Prasad Pandey, Teerthraj Verma, Devi Prasad Pandey, Ghizal Firdous Ansari
{"title":"Mathematical analysis of gamma index on pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance with octavius 4D rotational phantom for 2d and 3d space.","authors":"Shilpa Tiwari, Vindhyavasini Prasad Pandey, Teerthraj Verma, Devi Prasad Pandey, Ghizal Firdous Ansari","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1766_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gamma index is one of the widely used metrics to evaluate the patient-specific quality assurance parameters for the delivery of accepted treatment plans. The dimensionality of gamma metric has changed from two-dimensional to three-dimensional with due course of time, and presently, we are in a verge to assess the three-dimensional metric in a volumetric scale. The present study aimed at determining the mathematical relationship between 2D, 3D, and 3D volumetric gamma index for patient-specific quality assurance parameters using the Octavius 4D rotational phantom.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Twenty-five patients planned with volumetric modulated radiotherapy for different sites were selected for the study to analyze the pretreatment parameters correlation using 2D- Array 1500 rotational Octavius phantom. The data were collected in both local and global dose modes at 5%/5 mm, 4%/4 mm, 3%/3 mm, and 2%/2 mm for 2D, 3D, and Volmetric 3D gamma index. The passing criterion of Gamma <=1.0 is applicable throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant jump in the passing rate percentage was found from 2D planar to 3D planar mode analysis. Decreased passing percentage values in both local and global modes from 3D planar to 3D volumetric mode analysis were recorded. The 2D and 3D planar analysis shows a significant level of correlation which is less pronounced in 3D planar to 3D volumetric gamma metric evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiotherapy centers having the license for 2D planar gamma index analysis can retrace the results into 3D planar analysis, which is always a better passing percentage rate, and no such implication of 3D volumetric analysis was found as the passing rate significantly shows a high degree of entropy in results. The effective use of 3D volumetric gamma metric can be appreciable if the CT overlay parameter is used in assessment and qualitatively the quantification can be predicted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 3","pages":"657-663"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1766_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gamma index is one of the widely used metrics to evaluate the patient-specific quality assurance parameters for the delivery of accepted treatment plans. The dimensionality of gamma metric has changed from two-dimensional to three-dimensional with due course of time, and presently, we are in a verge to assess the three-dimensional metric in a volumetric scale. The present study aimed at determining the mathematical relationship between 2D, 3D, and 3D volumetric gamma index for patient-specific quality assurance parameters using the Octavius 4D rotational phantom.

Methods and materials: Twenty-five patients planned with volumetric modulated radiotherapy for different sites were selected for the study to analyze the pretreatment parameters correlation using 2D- Array 1500 rotational Octavius phantom. The data were collected in both local and global dose modes at 5%/5 mm, 4%/4 mm, 3%/3 mm, and 2%/2 mm for 2D, 3D, and Volmetric 3D gamma index. The passing criterion of Gamma <=1.0 is applicable throughout the study.

Results: A significant jump in the passing rate percentage was found from 2D planar to 3D planar mode analysis. Decreased passing percentage values in both local and global modes from 3D planar to 3D volumetric mode analysis were recorded. The 2D and 3D planar analysis shows a significant level of correlation which is less pronounced in 3D planar to 3D volumetric gamma metric evaluation.

Conclusion: The radiotherapy centers having the license for 2D planar gamma index analysis can retrace the results into 3D planar analysis, which is always a better passing percentage rate, and no such implication of 3D volumetric analysis was found as the passing rate significantly shows a high degree of entropy in results. The effective use of 3D volumetric gamma metric can be appreciable if the CT overlay parameter is used in assessment and qualitatively the quantification can be predicted.

二维和三维空间octavius 4D旋转模体预处理患者特异性质量保证的gamma指数的数学分析。
Gamma指数是广泛使用的指标之一,用于评估患者特定的质量保证参数,以提供可接受的治疗计划。随着时间的推移,伽马度量的维度已经从二维转变为三维,目前,我们正处于以体积尺度评估三维度量的边缘。本研究旨在利用Octavius 4D旋转模体确定患者特定质量保证参数的2D、3D和3D体积伽马指数之间的数学关系。方法与材料:选择25例计划在不同部位进行体积调制放疗的患者,使用2D- Array 1500旋转Octavius幻影分析预处理参数的相关性。数据是在局部和全局剂量模式下收集的,分别为5%/ 5mm、4%/ 4mm、3%/ 3mm和2%/ 2mm,用于2D、3D和Volmetric 3D伽马指数。Gamma结果的通过率:从二维平面到三维平面模态分析通过率有明显的跃升。记录了从三维平面到三维体积模式分析的局部和全局模式中通过百分比值的降低。二维和三维平面分析显示了显著的相关性,而在三维平面和三维体积伽马度量评估中,相关性不那么明显。结论:获得二维平面伽玛指数分析许可的放疗中心可将结果追溯至三维平面分析,通过率始终较高,未发现三维体积分析的含义,通过率明显显示结果的高熵度。如果在评估中使用CT覆盖参数,并且可以定性地预测定量,则可以有效地利用三维体积伽马度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信