Dosimetric implications of omitting vaginal loading in hybrid brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix without vaginal infiltration.

IF 1.3
Devender Reddy Boja, Harjot Kaur Bajwa, N V N Madhusudhana Sresty, Krishnam Raju Alluri, Hima Bindu Pitta
{"title":"Dosimetric implications of omitting vaginal loading in hybrid brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix without vaginal infiltration.","authors":"Devender Reddy Boja, Harjot Kaur Bajwa, N V N Madhusudhana Sresty, Krishnam Raju Alluri, Hima Bindu Pitta","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_568_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the dosimetric parameters in hybrid brachytherapy with and without using the vaginal component for carcinoma cervix patients that do not have disease extending to the vagina.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients without vaginal involvement who received chemoradiation and hybrid brachytherapy were prospectively included for analysis. Two plans were created for each patient. The first plan (Plan 1) was created by loading the interstitial component to 10-20% of the tandem loading and reducing the vaginal loading to 30%. The second plan (Plan 2) was created by loading the tandem and interstitial component only and eliminating the vaginal loading (ovoid's). The dose delivered with brachytherapy was 21 Gy in 3 fractions. The dosimetric parameters compared between the two plans were D90 HRCTV, D98 IRCTV, TRAK, D2cc to bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and dose to the ICRU 89 RV point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included for analysis. The mean HRCTV volume was 30 cc. The mean D90 HRCTV was 88.1 Gy EQD2 for Plan 1 vs 87.8 Gy EQD2 for Plan 2, respectively (P = 0.113). On statistical analysis, there was a significant difference between Rectum D2cc (72.4 Gy vs 67.3 Gy) and ICRU 89 RV point dose (71.3 Gy vs 61.2 Gy) between the two plans (P = 0.0001). The mean D2cc to bladder and sigmoid was similar between the two plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In carcinoma cervix patients without vaginal involvement, omission of vaginal loading in tandem and ovoid hybrid brachytherapy reduces rectum and RV point doses while maintaining target coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 3","pages":"606-610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_568_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the dosimetric parameters in hybrid brachytherapy with and without using the vaginal component for carcinoma cervix patients that do not have disease extending to the vagina.

Materials and methods: Patients without vaginal involvement who received chemoradiation and hybrid brachytherapy were prospectively included for analysis. Two plans were created for each patient. The first plan (Plan 1) was created by loading the interstitial component to 10-20% of the tandem loading and reducing the vaginal loading to 30%. The second plan (Plan 2) was created by loading the tandem and interstitial component only and eliminating the vaginal loading (ovoid's). The dose delivered with brachytherapy was 21 Gy in 3 fractions. The dosimetric parameters compared between the two plans were D90 HRCTV, D98 IRCTV, TRAK, D2cc to bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and dose to the ICRU 89 RV point.

Results: Thirty patients were included for analysis. The mean HRCTV volume was 30 cc. The mean D90 HRCTV was 88.1 Gy EQD2 for Plan 1 vs 87.8 Gy EQD2 for Plan 2, respectively (P = 0.113). On statistical analysis, there was a significant difference between Rectum D2cc (72.4 Gy vs 67.3 Gy) and ICRU 89 RV point dose (71.3 Gy vs 61.2 Gy) between the two plans (P = 0.0001). The mean D2cc to bladder and sigmoid was similar between the two plans.

Conclusion: In carcinoma cervix patients without vaginal involvement, omission of vaginal loading in tandem and ovoid hybrid brachytherapy reduces rectum and RV point doses while maintaining target coverage.

省略阴道负荷的混合近距离治疗宫颈癌无阴道浸润的剂量学意义。
目的:比较有无阴道成分的混合近距离放疗对未病变延伸至阴道的宫颈癌患者的剂量学参数。材料和方法:前瞻性纳入接受放化疗和混合近距离放疗的无阴道受损伤患者进行分析。为每个病人制定了两个计划。第一种方案(方案1)是通过将间质组件加载到串联负载的10-20%,并将阴道负载减少到30%来创建的。第二个方案(方案2)是通过只加载串联和间质组件而消除阴道(卵形)加载而创建的。近距离放疗剂量为21 Gy,分3次给予。比较两种方案的剂量学参数为:HRCTV D90、IRCTV D98、TRAK、膀胱、直肠、乙状窦的D2cc、ICRU 89 RV点剂量。结果:30例患者纳入分析。平均HRCTV体积为30 cc,计划1的平均D90 HRCTV分别为88.1 Gy EQD2和87.8 Gy EQD2 (P = 0.113)。经统计分析,直肠D2cc (72.4 Gy vs 67.3 Gy)和ICRU 89 RV点剂量(71.3 Gy vs 61.2 Gy)两种方案间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0001)。膀胱和乙状结肠的平均D2cc在两种方案之间相似。结论:在没有阴道受累的宫颈癌患者中,串联和卵形混合近距离放疗省略阴道负荷可减少直肠和RV点剂量,同时保持靶覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信