Association between Solid Cooking Fuel Use and Frailty Trajectories: Findings from a Nationwide Cohort in China.

Yang Liu, Bing Jie Wu, Bing Bing Fan, Chun Xia Li, Chang Su, Ai Dong Liu, Tao Zhang
{"title":"Association between Solid Cooking Fuel Use and Frailty Trajectories: Findings from a Nationwide Cohort in China.","authors":"Yang Liu, Bing Jie Wu, Bing Bing Fan, Chun Xia Li, Chang Su, Ai Dong Liu, Tao Zhang","doi":"10.3967/bes2025.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Burning solid cooking fuel contributes to household air pollution and is associated with frailty. However, how solid cooking fuel use contributes to the development of frailty has not been well illustrated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited 8,947 participants aged ≥ 45 years from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, 2011-2018. Group-based trajectory modeling was employed to identify frailty trajectories. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between solid cooking fuel use and frailty trajectories. Population-attributable fractions were used to estimate the frailty burden from solid fuel use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three frailty trajectories: low-stable ( <i>n</i> = 5,789), moderate-increasing ( <i>n</i> = 2,603), and fast-increasing ( <i>n</i> = 555). Solid fuel use was associated with higher odds of being in the moderate-increasing ( <i>OR</i>: 1.24, 95% <i>CI</i>: 1.08-1.42) and fast-increasing ( <i>OR</i>: 1.48, 95% <i>CI</i>: 1.14-1.92) trajectories. These associations were strengthened by longer solid fuel use ( <i>P</i> for trend < 0.001). Switching to clean fuel significantly reduced the risk of being in these trajectories compared with persistent solid fuel users. Without solid fuel, 8% of moderate- and 19% of fast-increasing trajectories demonstrated frailty development like the low-stable group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Solid cooking fuel use is associated with frailty trajectories in middle-aged and older Chinese populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":"38 6","pages":"653-665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2025.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Burning solid cooking fuel contributes to household air pollution and is associated with frailty. However, how solid cooking fuel use contributes to the development of frailty has not been well illustrated.

Methods: This study recruited 8,947 participants aged ≥ 45 years from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, 2011-2018. Group-based trajectory modeling was employed to identify frailty trajectories. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between solid cooking fuel use and frailty trajectories. Population-attributable fractions were used to estimate the frailty burden from solid fuel use.

Results: We identified three frailty trajectories: low-stable ( n = 5,789), moderate-increasing ( n = 2,603), and fast-increasing ( n = 555). Solid fuel use was associated with higher odds of being in the moderate-increasing ( OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08-1.42) and fast-increasing ( OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14-1.92) trajectories. These associations were strengthened by longer solid fuel use ( P for trend < 0.001). Switching to clean fuel significantly reduced the risk of being in these trajectories compared with persistent solid fuel users. Without solid fuel, 8% of moderate- and 19% of fast-increasing trajectories demonstrated frailty development like the low-stable group.

Conclusion: Solid cooking fuel use is associated with frailty trajectories in middle-aged and older Chinese populations.

固体烹饪燃料使用与脆弱轨迹之间的关系:来自中国全国队列的研究结果。
目的:燃烧固体烹饪燃料有助于家庭空气污染,并与虚弱有关。然而,固体烹饪燃料的使用如何促进脆弱的发展还没有得到很好的说明。方法:本研究从2011-2018年中国健康与退休纵向研究中招募8,947名年龄≥45岁的参与者。采用基于组的轨迹建模方法识别脆弱轨迹。使用多项逻辑回归来评估固体烹饪燃料使用与脆弱轨迹之间的关联。使用人口归因分数来估计固体燃料使用造成的脆弱负担。结果:我们确定了三种脆弱性轨迹:低稳定(n = 5,789),中等增长(n = 2,603)和快速增长(n = 555)。固体燃料的使用与处于中等增长(OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08-1.42)和快速增长(OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14-1.92)轨迹的较高几率相关。这些关联随着固体燃料使用时间的延长而加强(P表示趋势< 0.001)。与长期使用固体燃料相比,改用清洁燃料大大降低了陷入这些轨迹的风险。在没有固体燃料的情况下,8%的中等增长轨迹和19%的快速增长轨迹表现出与低稳定组一样的脆弱发展。结论:固体烹饪燃料的使用与中国中老年人群的虚弱轨迹有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信