Online RCT of added-sugar warning labels and Spanish-English label education.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ethan C Wolf, Marissa G Hall, Dean Schillinger, Jim Krieger, Jennifer A Woo Baidal, Sarah Solar, Christina Lin, Jennifer Falbe
{"title":"Online RCT of added-sugar warning labels and Spanish-English label education.","authors":"Ethan C Wolf, Marissa G Hall, Dean Schillinger, Jim Krieger, Jennifer A Woo Baidal, Sarah Solar, Christina Lin, Jennifer Falbe","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A policy requiring front-of-package added-sugar warning labels has the potential to improve dietary patterns in the U.S. However, because such a policy would require English labels, the labels may not be equally effective among individuals with varying English proficiency. One potential way to increase the broad efficacy of warning labels is to use a multilingual campaign to explain the labels. This study's objective was to determine whether combining an added-sugar warning label with a Spanish and English educational message reduces intention to select sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to a greater extent than either the label or educational message alone among Hispanic adults.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Online RCT.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>2,000 U.S. Hispanic adults with varying acculturation participated between October-December 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions: (1) control, (2) language-matched message about added-sugar warning labels (in English or Spanish), (3) warning label (English, yellow, icon) on SSBs, and (4) message-plus-warning.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Intention to select an SSB, measured by hypothetical SSB selection in an online shopping task, analyzed May 2023-April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the control condition, 58% selected an SSB for themselves. In comparison, a significantly lower percentage of participants selected an SSB in the message (43%), warning label (38%), and message-plus-warning (27%) conditions (p-values<0.001). The message-plus-warning condition had a lower risk of SSB selection than both the message and warning conditions (p-values<0.001). Efficacy was larger for the message among those with lower acculturation and for the warning among those navigating the study in Spanish and certain income categories. Results were similar for the secondary outcome of selecting an SSB for one's child.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using educational messages in more than one language to accompany rollout of a new warning label may further improve outcomes in populations with varying levels of acculturation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT: NCT05563181).</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107966"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A policy requiring front-of-package added-sugar warning labels has the potential to improve dietary patterns in the U.S. However, because such a policy would require English labels, the labels may not be equally effective among individuals with varying English proficiency. One potential way to increase the broad efficacy of warning labels is to use a multilingual campaign to explain the labels. This study's objective was to determine whether combining an added-sugar warning label with a Spanish and English educational message reduces intention to select sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to a greater extent than either the label or educational message alone among Hispanic adults.

Study design: Online RCT.

Setting/participants: 2,000 U.S. Hispanic adults with varying acculturation participated between October-December 2022.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions: (1) control, (2) language-matched message about added-sugar warning labels (in English or Spanish), (3) warning label (English, yellow, icon) on SSBs, and (4) message-plus-warning.

Main outcome measures: Intention to select an SSB, measured by hypothetical SSB selection in an online shopping task, analyzed May 2023-April 2024.

Results: In the control condition, 58% selected an SSB for themselves. In comparison, a significantly lower percentage of participants selected an SSB in the message (43%), warning label (38%), and message-plus-warning (27%) conditions (p-values<0.001). The message-plus-warning condition had a lower risk of SSB selection than both the message and warning conditions (p-values<0.001). Efficacy was larger for the message among those with lower acculturation and for the warning among those navigating the study in Spanish and certain income categories. Results were similar for the secondary outcome of selecting an SSB for one's child.

Conclusions: Using educational messages in more than one language to accompany rollout of a new warning label may further improve outcomes in populations with varying levels of acculturation.

Trial registration: Trial registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT: NCT05563181).

添加糖警告标签和西班牙-英语标签教育的在线随机对照试验。
导读:一项要求在包装正面添加糖警告标签的政策有可能改善美国的饮食模式。然而,由于这项政策需要英文标签,标签可能对英语熟练程度不同的个人不一样有效。增加警告标签广泛效力的一个潜在方法是使用多语言宣传来解释标签。本研究的目的是确定在西班牙裔成年人中,添加糖警告标签与西班牙语和英语教育信息相结合是否比单独使用标签或教育信息更能减少选择含糖饮料(SSBs)的意愿。研究设计:在线随机对照试验。背景/参与者:在2022年10月至12月期间,2000名不同文化适应的美国西班牙裔成年人参与了这项研究。干预:参与者被随机分配到4个条件中的1个:(1)对照组,(2)关于添加糖警告标签的语言匹配信息(英文或西班牙语),(3)ssb上的警告标签(英文,黄色,图标),(4)信息加警告。主要结果测量:选择SSB的意愿,通过在线购物任务中的假设SSB选择来测量,分析2023年5月- 2024年4月。结果:在对照组中,58%的人为自己选择了SSB。相比之下,在信息(43%)、警告标签(38%)和信息加警告(27%)条件下选择SSB的参与者比例明显较低。结论:在不同文化适应水平的人群中,使用一种以上语言的教育信息伴随着新的警告标签的推出,可能会进一步改善结果。试验注册:在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册的试验(NCT: NCT05563181)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信