Evaluating clinical decision rules and rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis in Gambian children: a diagnostic accuracy study.

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Edwin P Armitage, Elina Senghore, Fatoumata E Camara, Sheikh Jarju, Sukai Jagne, Ebrima Ceesay, Fatoumata Fornah Darboe, Gabrielle de Crombrugghe, Alexander J Keeley, Jennifer N Hall, Adrienn Angyal, Musukoi Jammeh, Saffiatou Darboe, Adam Kucharski, Pierre R Smeesters, Thushan I de Silva, Michael Marks, On Behalf Of The Mrcg StrepA Study Group
{"title":"Evaluating clinical decision rules and rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis in Gambian children: a diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Edwin P Armitage, Elina Senghore, Fatoumata E Camara, Sheikh Jarju, Sukai Jagne, Ebrima Ceesay, Fatoumata Fornah Darboe, Gabrielle de Crombrugghe, Alexander J Keeley, Jennifer N Hall, Adrienn Angyal, Musukoi Jammeh, Saffiatou Darboe, Adam Kucharski, Pierre R Smeesters, Thushan I de Silva, Michael Marks, On Behalf Of The Mrcg StrepA Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Accurate diagnosis of Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) pharyngitis is imperative in high rheumatic heart disease-burden countries. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of two rapid diagnostic tests and five clinical decision rules (CDRs) in The Gambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children under 16 years presenting with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis were recruited at Sukuta Health Centre, The Gambia. A rapid antigen detection test (SD Bioline; LFT) and a rapid gene-amplification test (ID NOW™ STREP A2) were assessed for diagnostic accuracy alongside five CDRs against culture and qPCR for S. pyogenes. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for S. pyogenes pharyngitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 376 participants, S. pyogenes positivity was 9·8% (37/376) by culture, 32·4% (122/376) by PCR, 31·6% (119/376) by LFT, and 33·3% (122/366) by ID NOW. The ID NOW had sensitivities and specificities of 94·6% and 73·6% against culture, and 93·5% and 87·6% against PCR. The LFT had sensitivities and specificities of 83·8% and 74·0% against culture and 55·7% and 80·0% against PCR. The Smeesters CDR performed best with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0·694 against culture. S. pyogenes pharyngitis risk increased with age. Recent chest infection/cough (aOR 1·89, 1·08-3·28) and concurrent skin infection (aOR 2·11, 1·21-3·69) were associated with increased S. pyogenes pharyngitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LFT and the CDRs had poor performance in detecting S. pyogenes pharyngitis compared to PCR and culture. Molecular methods detected a higher proportion of S. pyogenes than culture. Affordable and sensitive diagnostics are urgently needed to improve S. pyogenes management in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106546"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate diagnosis of Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) pharyngitis is imperative in high rheumatic heart disease-burden countries. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of two rapid diagnostic tests and five clinical decision rules (CDRs) in The Gambia.

Methods: Children under 16 years presenting with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis were recruited at Sukuta Health Centre, The Gambia. A rapid antigen detection test (SD Bioline; LFT) and a rapid gene-amplification test (ID NOW™ STREP A2) were assessed for diagnostic accuracy alongside five CDRs against culture and qPCR for S. pyogenes. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for S. pyogenes pharyngitis.

Results: Among 376 participants, S. pyogenes positivity was 9·8% (37/376) by culture, 32·4% (122/376) by PCR, 31·6% (119/376) by LFT, and 33·3% (122/366) by ID NOW. The ID NOW had sensitivities and specificities of 94·6% and 73·6% against culture, and 93·5% and 87·6% against PCR. The LFT had sensitivities and specificities of 83·8% and 74·0% against culture and 55·7% and 80·0% against PCR. The Smeesters CDR performed best with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0·694 against culture. S. pyogenes pharyngitis risk increased with age. Recent chest infection/cough (aOR 1·89, 1·08-3·28) and concurrent skin infection (aOR 2·11, 1·21-3·69) were associated with increased S. pyogenes pharyngitis.

Conclusions: The LFT and the CDRs had poor performance in detecting S. pyogenes pharyngitis compared to PCR and culture. Molecular methods detected a higher proportion of S. pyogenes than culture. Affordable and sensitive diagnostics are urgently needed to improve S. pyogenes management in resource-limited settings.

评估冈比亚儿童化脓性链球菌咽炎诊断的临床决策规则和快速诊断试验:诊断准确性研究
目的:在风湿性心脏病高负担国家,准确诊断化脓性链球菌(S. pyogenes)咽炎势在必行。我们旨在评估冈比亚两种快速诊断测试和五种临床决策规则(cdr)的诊断准确性。方法:在冈比亚Sukuta保健中心招募有咽炎体征和症状的16岁以下儿童。快速抗原检测试验(SD Bioline;LFT)和快速基因扩增试验(ID NOW™STREP A2)与5种cdr对照培养和qPCR对化脓性链球菌的诊断准确性进行了评估。采用Logistic回归确定化脓性链球菌咽炎的危险因素。结果:376名参与者中,化脓性链球菌培养阳性率为9.8% (37/376),PCR阳性率为32.4% (122/376),LFT阳性率为31.6% (119/376),ID NOW阳性率为33.3%(122/366)。该方法对培养的敏感性和特异性分别为94.6%和73.6%,对PCR的敏感性和特异性分别为93.5%和86.7%。LFT对培养的敏感性和特异性分别为83.8%和71.4%,对PCR的敏感性和特异性分别为55.7%和80.8%。Smeesters CDR效果最好,曲线下面积(AUC)为0·694。化脓性链球菌咽炎风险随年龄增加而增加。近期胸部感染/咳嗽(aOR为1.89,1.08 - 3.28)和并发皮肤感染(aOR为2.11,1.21 - 3.69)与化脓性链球菌咽炎增加相关。结论:与PCR和培养相比,LFT和cdr检测化脓链球菌咽炎的效果较差。分子法检测化脓性葡萄球菌的比例高于培养法。在资源有限的环境中,迫切需要负担得起和敏感的诊断方法来改善化脓性链球菌的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信