'What is Your Job?': A Qualitative Analysis of the Deployment, Utilisation, and Contribution of Support Workers in Diagnostic Imaging Services in England.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sarah Etty, Beverly Snaith, Robert Appleyard, Julie Nightingale
{"title":"'What is Your Job?': A Qualitative Analysis of the Deployment, Utilisation, and Contribution of Support Workers in Diagnostic Imaging Services in England.","authors":"Sarah Etty, Beverly Snaith, Robert Appleyard, Julie Nightingale","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Support workers (SWs) form the largest section of the NHS workforce, and the ongoing NHS workforce crisis underscores the need for their efficient utilisation. This study explored the deployment of imaging SWs within NHS radiology departments in England, forming part of a larger multiphase research project funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It involved multi-centre case studies across nine radiology departments, employing a thematic analysis of focus groups and interviews with a range of radiology staff, including SWs themselves (n = 113). Results showed that recruitment of SWs was generally not challenging, however, retention was variable potentially due to limited opportunities for career progression and a lack of role understanding. Deployment strategies varied significantly across sites, which sometimes influenced SW effectiveness and were often selected for service need rather than SW development. Role scope was often unclear and training inconsistent which may exacerbate poor role understanding, and the lack of clear career pathways outside of professional registration conflicted with SWs' strong desire for progression. SWs are highly valued, crucial to operational efficiency and excellent patient care. Efficient deployment of SWs within NHS radiology services is crucial for alleviating workforce shortages and improving service delivery, however, this is impeded by the variability in role definition and deployment practices evidenced in this study. Standardising role titles, responsibilities, and training, and creating clear progression pathways could help to fully harness the capabilities of SWs in healthcare settings. National frameworks offer recommendations for standardisation, but this study suggests implementation remains inconsistent or delayed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Support workers (SWs) form the largest section of the NHS workforce, and the ongoing NHS workforce crisis underscores the need for their efficient utilisation. This study explored the deployment of imaging SWs within NHS radiology departments in England, forming part of a larger multiphase research project funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It involved multi-centre case studies across nine radiology departments, employing a thematic analysis of focus groups and interviews with a range of radiology staff, including SWs themselves (n = 113). Results showed that recruitment of SWs was generally not challenging, however, retention was variable potentially due to limited opportunities for career progression and a lack of role understanding. Deployment strategies varied significantly across sites, which sometimes influenced SW effectiveness and were often selected for service need rather than SW development. Role scope was often unclear and training inconsistent which may exacerbate poor role understanding, and the lack of clear career pathways outside of professional registration conflicted with SWs' strong desire for progression. SWs are highly valued, crucial to operational efficiency and excellent patient care. Efficient deployment of SWs within NHS radiology services is crucial for alleviating workforce shortages and improving service delivery, however, this is impeded by the variability in role definition and deployment practices evidenced in this study. Standardising role titles, responsibilities, and training, and creating clear progression pathways could help to fully harness the capabilities of SWs in healthcare settings. National frameworks offer recommendations for standardisation, but this study suggests implementation remains inconsistent or delayed.

“你的工作是什么?”:对英国诊断成像服务中支持工作者的部署、利用和贡献的定性分析。
支持工作者(SWs)构成了NHS劳动力的最大部分,正在进行的NHS劳动力危机强调了他们有效利用的必要性。本研究探讨了成像SWs在英国NHS放射科的部署,这是由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)资助的一个更大的多阶段研究项目的一部分。它涉及九个放射科的多中心案例研究,采用焦点小组的专题分析和对一系列放射科工作人员的访谈,包括SWs本身(n = 113)。结果表明,招聘SWs通常没有挑战性,然而,由于职业发展机会有限和缺乏角色理解,挽留率可能会有所变化。部署策略在不同的站点之间差异很大,这有时会影响软件的有效性,并且通常是根据服务需求而不是软件开发而选择的。角色范围往往不明确,培训不一致,这可能会加剧对角色的不理解,并且在专业注册之外缺乏明确的职业道路,这与SWs强烈的晋升愿望相冲突。SWs的价值很高,对运营效率和出色的患者护理至关重要。在NHS放射服务中有效部署SWs对于缓解劳动力短缺和改善服务提供至关重要,然而,这受到本研究中所证明的角色定义和部署实践的变化的阻碍。标准化角色名称、职责和培训,并创建明确的晋升途径,有助于充分利用医疗保健环境中社会服务人员的能力。国家框架为标准化提供了建议,但这项研究表明,实施仍然不一致或延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信