Remote usability testing in healthcare: Evaluating tools and technologies from afar.

Q3 Medicine
Shaunna Milloy, Jared Dembicki
{"title":"Remote usability testing in healthcare: Evaluating tools and technologies from afar.","authors":"Shaunna Milloy, Jared Dembicki","doi":"10.1177/08404704251355207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In healthcare settings, frustrating and confusing product and system designs can lead to use errors that can negatively impact patient safety. Usability testing is an established and widely used human factors evaluation method which can be employed to assess ease of use. In a usability test, participants complete simulated tasks using a product or system, and insights gained from their interactions are used to inform design changes. COVID-19, cost savings, and reduced travel have driven the expansion of remote usability beyond more traditional in-person testing. Two project examples are used to showcase how remote usability testing can be applied to both a dynamic web-based patient safety reporting system and a static clinical cognitive aid. Next, the benefits and pitfalls of remote usability testing, and when the method can be utilized effectively, are examined. Finally, strategies for using videoconferencing platforms to successfully evaluate various healthcare products and systems are shared.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251355207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251355207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In healthcare settings, frustrating and confusing product and system designs can lead to use errors that can negatively impact patient safety. Usability testing is an established and widely used human factors evaluation method which can be employed to assess ease of use. In a usability test, participants complete simulated tasks using a product or system, and insights gained from their interactions are used to inform design changes. COVID-19, cost savings, and reduced travel have driven the expansion of remote usability beyond more traditional in-person testing. Two project examples are used to showcase how remote usability testing can be applied to both a dynamic web-based patient safety reporting system and a static clinical cognitive aid. Next, the benefits and pitfalls of remote usability testing, and when the method can be utilized effectively, are examined. Finally, strategies for using videoconferencing platforms to successfully evaluate various healthcare products and systems are shared.

医疗保健中的远程可用性测试:远程评估工具和技术。
在医疗保健环境中,令人沮丧和困惑的产品和系统设计可能导致使用错误,从而对患者安全产生负面影响。可用性测试是一种成熟的、广泛应用的人因评估方法,可以用来评估产品的易用性。在可用性测试中,参与者使用产品或系统完成模拟任务,从他们的交互中获得的见解用于通知设计更改。COVID-19、成本节约和差旅减少推动了远程可用性的扩展,超越了更传统的现场测试。本文使用了两个项目示例来展示如何将远程可用性测试应用于基于web的动态患者安全报告系统和静态临床认知辅助系统。接下来,讨论远程可用性测试的好处和缺陷,以及何时可以有效地利用该方法。最后,分享了使用视频会议平台成功评估各种医疗保健产品和系统的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信