Prediction of generalized anxiety disorder treatment outcomes with neurobehavioral responses to approach-avoidance conflict: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hannah Berg, Timothy J McDermott, Rayus Kuplicki, Hung-Wen Yeh, Wesley K Thompson, Ryan Smith, Elisabeth Akeman, Namik Kirlic, Ashley Clausen, Mallory Cannon, Evan White, Christopher R Martell, Kate B Wolitzky-Taylor, Michelle G Craske, James L Abelson, Martin P Paulus, Robin L Aupperle
{"title":"Prediction of generalized anxiety disorder treatment outcomes with neurobehavioral responses to approach-avoidance conflict: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Hannah Berg, Timothy J McDermott, Rayus Kuplicki, Hung-Wen Yeh, Wesley K Thompson, Ryan Smith, Elisabeth Akeman, Namik Kirlic, Ashley Clausen, Mallory Cannon, Evan White, Christopher R Martell, Kate B Wolitzky-Taylor, Michelle G Craske, James L Abelson, Martin P Paulus, Robin L Aupperle","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03460-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) often aim to address maladaptive approach-avoidance behavior patterns. Approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) offers a potential framework for identifying treatment outcome predictors and informing optimization of GAD treatment. The current study examined whether pre-treatment neurobehavioral AAC indices predict symptom improvement in behavioral activation (BA) and exposure therapy (EXP) for GAD. Treatment-seeking adults meeting criteria for GAD completed a randomized clinical trial with pre-treatment blinding, conducted from 2016-2021. Participants were randomized to complete 10 manualized sessions of BA or EXP. Participants completed an AAC task during functional magnetic resonance imaging pre-treatment. Computational parameters of task behavior were derived, and neural activity was assessed during decision-making and positive and negative outcomes of decisions. Outcome measures were GAD symptoms and depressive symptoms. Of 121 participants recruited, 56 (29 BA, 27 EXP; mean age 33.0 years; 12.5% male) treatment completers were included in analyses. Greater AAC task avoidance (d = -0.28) and greater left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during negative outcomes (d = -0.32), predicted greater symptom reduction across treatments. Blunted left amygdala activation to positive outcomes was associated at a trend level with favorable symptom reduction for BA but not EXP (d = -0.20). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may be a target for enhancing behavior therapy outcomes generally, while left amygdala activation to positive affect may be a target for enhancing outcomes for BA. These findings may inform the optimization of behavioral therapies for GAD and hold potential for transdiagnostic applications, warranting larger, longitudinal studies in clinical settings. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02807480.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"231"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03460-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) often aim to address maladaptive approach-avoidance behavior patterns. Approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) offers a potential framework for identifying treatment outcome predictors and informing optimization of GAD treatment. The current study examined whether pre-treatment neurobehavioral AAC indices predict symptom improvement in behavioral activation (BA) and exposure therapy (EXP) for GAD. Treatment-seeking adults meeting criteria for GAD completed a randomized clinical trial with pre-treatment blinding, conducted from 2016-2021. Participants were randomized to complete 10 manualized sessions of BA or EXP. Participants completed an AAC task during functional magnetic resonance imaging pre-treatment. Computational parameters of task behavior were derived, and neural activity was assessed during decision-making and positive and negative outcomes of decisions. Outcome measures were GAD symptoms and depressive symptoms. Of 121 participants recruited, 56 (29 BA, 27 EXP; mean age 33.0 years; 12.5% male) treatment completers were included in analyses. Greater AAC task avoidance (d = -0.28) and greater left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during negative outcomes (d = -0.32), predicted greater symptom reduction across treatments. Blunted left amygdala activation to positive outcomes was associated at a trend level with favorable symptom reduction for BA but not EXP (d = -0.20). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may be a target for enhancing behavior therapy outcomes generally, while left amygdala activation to positive affect may be a target for enhancing outcomes for BA. These findings may inform the optimization of behavioral therapies for GAD and hold potential for transdiagnostic applications, warranting larger, longitudinal studies in clinical settings. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02807480.

预测广泛性焦虑障碍治疗结果与神经行为反应的方法回避冲突:一项随机临床试验。
广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的治疗通常旨在解决不适应的避近行为模式。方法回避冲突(AAC)为确定治疗结果预测因子和优化广泛性焦虑症治疗提供了一个潜在的框架。本研究考察了治疗前神经行为AAC指数是否能预测行为激活(BA)和暴露治疗(EXP)对广泛性焦虑症的症状改善。符合广泛性焦虑症标准的寻求治疗的成年人完成了一项随机临床试验,治疗前盲法,从2016年到2021年进行。参与者随机完成10个手动BA或EXP会话。参与者在功能磁共振成像预处理期间完成了AAC任务。推导了任务行为的计算参数,评估了决策过程中的神经活动以及决策的积极和消极结果。结果测量是广泛性焦虑症症状和抑郁症状。在121名被招募的参与者中,56名(29名BA, 27名EXP;平均年龄33.0岁;12.5%(男性)治疗完成者被纳入分析。在负面结果期间,更大的AAC任务回避(d = -0.28)和更大的左背外侧前额叶皮层激活(d = -0.32)预示着治疗期间更大的症状减轻。钝化的左杏仁核激活与阳性结果在趋势水平上与BA的有利症状减轻相关,但与EXP无关(d = -0.20)。通常,背外侧前额皮质可能是增强行为治疗结果的靶点,而左杏仁核激活积极影响可能是增强BA结果的靶点。这些发现可能为优化广泛性焦虑症的行为疗法提供信息,并具有跨诊断应用的潜力,需要在临床环境中进行更大规模的纵向研究。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02807480。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信