HPV-16 lineages among women in Africa: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ivy Akinyi, Matthew Thomas Ferreira, Rosana Veronica Mendoza Lopez, Frank Onyango, Dollen Osundwa, Shehu Shagari Awandu, Johannes Bogers
{"title":"HPV-16 lineages among women in Africa: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Ivy Akinyi, Matthew Thomas Ferreira, Rosana Veronica Mendoza Lopez, Frank Onyango, Dollen Osundwa, Shehu Shagari Awandu, Johannes Bogers","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02891-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) is associated with cervical oncogenesis. The prevalence of HPV-16 lineages has not been well investigated in Africa. There is a lack of comprehensive epidemiological data on the distribution and oncogenic potential of the different HPV-16 lineages and sub-lineages in these populations. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the prevalence of HPV-16 lineages among women in Africa between 1997 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eight databases were searched, and studies that identified HPV-16 positive women with distinct HPV-16 lineages, and those that clearly defined an African population, were included. The eight databases include PubMed, PubMed Central, BVS, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost. This protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023437748) and followed the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 2698 studies that were screened, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Analysis of these 12 studies identified yielded 1209 HPV-16-positive samples based on distinct diagnostic tests. These samples were classified as lineage A (n = 556), lineage C (n = 278), lineage B (n = 235), and lineage D (n = 140). Overall, lineage A variants were found in 11 studies (556 samples), establishing an overall prevalence of 58% (95% CI: 0.31-0.80; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.0%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 2.924; p < 0.0001). Lineage C variants were identified in 8 studies (278 samples), with an overall prevalence of 39% (95% CI: 0.21-0.60; I<sup>2</sup> = 84.1%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 1.362; p < 0.0001). Lineage B variants were identified across 7 studies (235 samples), with a prevalence of 20% (95% CI: 0.09-0.37; I<sup>2</sup> = 90.4%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 1.109; p < 0.0001). Lineage D variants were identified across 5 studies (140 samples), and its overall prevalence was 10% (95% CI: 0.05-0.19; I<sup>2</sup> = 89.1%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.672; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women in Africa exhibit a varied distribution of the four HPV-16 lineages. The high prevalence of HPV-16 lineage A in the entire population calls for developing targeted interventions to maximize impact and effectiveness. Future studies that are standardized and include defined geographic region, cytological details, and individual patient data should be conducted to enhance robust findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02891-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) is associated with cervical oncogenesis. The prevalence of HPV-16 lineages has not been well investigated in Africa. There is a lack of comprehensive epidemiological data on the distribution and oncogenic potential of the different HPV-16 lineages and sub-lineages in these populations. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the prevalence of HPV-16 lineages among women in Africa between 1997 and 2023.

Method: Eight databases were searched, and studies that identified HPV-16 positive women with distinct HPV-16 lineages, and those that clearly defined an African population, were included. The eight databases include PubMed, PubMed Central, BVS, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost. This protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023437748) and followed the PRISMA guidelines.

Results: Out of the 2698 studies that were screened, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Analysis of these 12 studies identified yielded 1209 HPV-16-positive samples based on distinct diagnostic tests. These samples were classified as lineage A (n = 556), lineage C (n = 278), lineage B (n = 235), and lineage D (n = 140). Overall, lineage A variants were found in 11 studies (556 samples), establishing an overall prevalence of 58% (95% CI: 0.31-0.80; I2 = 96.0%; τ2 = 2.924; p < 0.0001). Lineage C variants were identified in 8 studies (278 samples), with an overall prevalence of 39% (95% CI: 0.21-0.60; I2 = 84.1%; τ2 = 1.362; p < 0.0001). Lineage B variants were identified across 7 studies (235 samples), with a prevalence of 20% (95% CI: 0.09-0.37; I2 = 90.4%; τ2 = 1.109; p < 0.0001). Lineage D variants were identified across 5 studies (140 samples), and its overall prevalence was 10% (95% CI: 0.05-0.19; I2 = 89.1%; τ2 = 0.672; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Women in Africa exhibit a varied distribution of the four HPV-16 lineages. The high prevalence of HPV-16 lineage A in the entire population calls for developing targeted interventions to maximize impact and effectiveness. Future studies that are standardized and include defined geographic region, cytological details, and individual patient data should be conducted to enhance robust findings.

非洲妇女的HPV-16谱系:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:感染高危16型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV-16)与宫颈癌的发生有关。HPV-16谱系的流行率在非洲尚未得到很好的调查。在这些人群中,缺乏关于不同HPV-16谱系和亚谱系的分布和致癌潜力的综合流行病学数据。通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,我们旨在确定1997年至2023年间非洲妇女中HPV-16谱系的流行情况。方法:对8个数据库进行了检索,并纳入了具有不同HPV-16血统的HPV-16阳性妇女的研究,以及那些明确定义为非洲人群的研究。这8个数据库包括PubMed、PubMed Central、BVS、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science和EBSCOhost。本协议已在普洛斯彼罗注册(CRD42023437748),并遵循PRISMA指南。结果:在筛选的2698项研究中,有12项研究符合纳入标准,被纳入系统评价和荟萃分析。对这12项研究的分析得出了1209例基于不同诊断测试的hpv -16阳性样本。这些样本分为谱系A (n = 556)、谱系C (n = 278)、谱系B (n = 235)和谱系D (n = 140)。总体而言,在11项研究(556个样本)中发现了谱系A变异,总体患病率为58% (95% CI: 0.31-0.80;i2 = 96.0%;τ2 = 2.924;p 2 = 84.1%;τ2 = 1.362;p 2 = 90.4%;τ2 = 1.109;p 2 = 89.1%;τ2 = 0.672;结论:非洲妇女在四种HPV-16谱系中表现出不同的分布。HPV-16谱系A在整个人群中的高流行率要求制定有针对性的干预措施,以最大限度地发挥作用和有效性。未来的标准化研究应包括明确的地理区域、细胞学细节和个体患者数据,以加强强有力的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信