"These Drugs Are Going to Save Our Lives" A Mixed Methods Study on the Role of Medication Perceptions in Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents Among Patients With Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer.
Yongfeng Chen, Marques Shek Nam Ng, Bei Dong, Carmen Wing Han Chan
{"title":"\"These Drugs Are Going to Save Our Lives\" A Mixed Methods Study on the Role of Medication Perceptions in Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents Among Patients With Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer.","authors":"Yongfeng Chen, Marques Shek Nam Ng, Bei Dong, Carmen Wing Han Chan","doi":"10.1002/pon.70213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer reported suboptimal adherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs), reducing the therapeutic benefit. According to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation, patients' medication perceptions decide adherence. However, how perceptions of OAAs influence adherence remains unknown among this population. This study explored this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent mixed methods study was conducted. In the quantitative part, medication perceptions were evaluated among 253 participants using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Perceived Sensitivity to Medicine, and Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale. Adherence was measured by the Morisky 4-item Medication Adherence Scale. In the qualitative part, 37 participants from the quantitative cohort were interviewed concurrently. Perceptions of OAAs were identified using content analysis. Findings were integrated using side-by-side comparisons and joint displays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data showed that 58.89% of patients were considered adherent. Adherent patients exhibited lower harm beliefs, less sensitivity to medicine, and higher medication self-efficacy. Qualitative data identified four categories of perceptions: emphasizing the effectiveness of OAAs despite the hazardous nature, experiencing negative emotions in relation to taking OAAs, taking responsibility for OAAs routine management, and encountering multiple barriers to taking OAAs. The qualitative findings supplemented the quantitative results regarding the associations between harm beliefs, perceived sensitivity to medicine, medication self-efficacy, and adherence; however, they revealed a discordance in the associations between necessity beliefs, concern beliefs, and adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategies targeting medication perceptions were suggested to promote adherence to OAAs, particularly those aimed at modifying negative medication beliefs and emotions, enhancing medication self-efficacy, and improving self-management abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 7","pages":"e70213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer reported suboptimal adherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs), reducing the therapeutic benefit. According to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation, patients' medication perceptions decide adherence. However, how perceptions of OAAs influence adherence remains unknown among this population. This study explored this relationship.
Methods: A convergent mixed methods study was conducted. In the quantitative part, medication perceptions were evaluated among 253 participants using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Perceived Sensitivity to Medicine, and Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale. Adherence was measured by the Morisky 4-item Medication Adherence Scale. In the qualitative part, 37 participants from the quantitative cohort were interviewed concurrently. Perceptions of OAAs were identified using content analysis. Findings were integrated using side-by-side comparisons and joint displays.
Results: Quantitative data showed that 58.89% of patients were considered adherent. Adherent patients exhibited lower harm beliefs, less sensitivity to medicine, and higher medication self-efficacy. Qualitative data identified four categories of perceptions: emphasizing the effectiveness of OAAs despite the hazardous nature, experiencing negative emotions in relation to taking OAAs, taking responsibility for OAAs routine management, and encountering multiple barriers to taking OAAs. The qualitative findings supplemented the quantitative results regarding the associations between harm beliefs, perceived sensitivity to medicine, medication self-efficacy, and adherence; however, they revealed a discordance in the associations between necessity beliefs, concern beliefs, and adherence.
Conclusions: Strategies targeting medication perceptions were suggested to promote adherence to OAAs, particularly those aimed at modifying negative medication beliefs and emotions, enhancing medication self-efficacy, and improving self-management abilities.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.