"These Drugs Are Going to Save Our Lives" A Mixed Methods Study on the Role of Medication Perceptions in Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents Among Patients With Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yongfeng Chen, Marques Shek Nam Ng, Bei Dong, Carmen Wing Han Chan
{"title":"\"These Drugs Are Going to Save Our Lives\" A Mixed Methods Study on the Role of Medication Perceptions in Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents Among Patients With Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer.","authors":"Yongfeng Chen, Marques Shek Nam Ng, Bei Dong, Carmen Wing Han Chan","doi":"10.1002/pon.70213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer reported suboptimal adherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs), reducing the therapeutic benefit. According to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation, patients' medication perceptions decide adherence. However, how perceptions of OAAs influence adherence remains unknown among this population. This study explored this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent mixed methods study was conducted. In the quantitative part, medication perceptions were evaluated among 253 participants using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Perceived Sensitivity to Medicine, and Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale. Adherence was measured by the Morisky 4-item Medication Adherence Scale. In the qualitative part, 37 participants from the quantitative cohort were interviewed concurrently. Perceptions of OAAs were identified using content analysis. Findings were integrated using side-by-side comparisons and joint displays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data showed that 58.89% of patients were considered adherent. Adherent patients exhibited lower harm beliefs, less sensitivity to medicine, and higher medication self-efficacy. Qualitative data identified four categories of perceptions: emphasizing the effectiveness of OAAs despite the hazardous nature, experiencing negative emotions in relation to taking OAAs, taking responsibility for OAAs routine management, and encountering multiple barriers to taking OAAs. The qualitative findings supplemented the quantitative results regarding the associations between harm beliefs, perceived sensitivity to medicine, medication self-efficacy, and adherence; however, they revealed a discordance in the associations between necessity beliefs, concern beliefs, and adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategies targeting medication perceptions were suggested to promote adherence to OAAs, particularly those aimed at modifying negative medication beliefs and emotions, enhancing medication self-efficacy, and improving self-management abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 7","pages":"e70213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer reported suboptimal adherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs), reducing the therapeutic benefit. According to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation, patients' medication perceptions decide adherence. However, how perceptions of OAAs influence adherence remains unknown among this population. This study explored this relationship.

Methods: A convergent mixed methods study was conducted. In the quantitative part, medication perceptions were evaluated among 253 participants using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Perceived Sensitivity to Medicine, and Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale. Adherence was measured by the Morisky 4-item Medication Adherence Scale. In the qualitative part, 37 participants from the quantitative cohort were interviewed concurrently. Perceptions of OAAs were identified using content analysis. Findings were integrated using side-by-side comparisons and joint displays.

Results: Quantitative data showed that 58.89% of patients were considered adherent. Adherent patients exhibited lower harm beliefs, less sensitivity to medicine, and higher medication self-efficacy. Qualitative data identified four categories of perceptions: emphasizing the effectiveness of OAAs despite the hazardous nature, experiencing negative emotions in relation to taking OAAs, taking responsibility for OAAs routine management, and encountering multiple barriers to taking OAAs. The qualitative findings supplemented the quantitative results regarding the associations between harm beliefs, perceived sensitivity to medicine, medication self-efficacy, and adherence; however, they revealed a discordance in the associations between necessity beliefs, concern beliefs, and adherence.

Conclusions: Strategies targeting medication perceptions were suggested to promote adherence to OAAs, particularly those aimed at modifying negative medication beliefs and emotions, enhancing medication self-efficacy, and improving self-management abilities.

“这些药物将拯救我们的生命”一项关于胃肠道癌症患者口服抗癌药物依从性的药物认知作用的混合方法研究。
目的:胃肠道癌症患者报告口服抗癌药物(OAAs)的依从性不佳,降低了治疗效果。根据自我调节的常识模型,患者的药物认知决定依从性。然而,在这一人群中,对oaa的看法如何影响依从性仍然未知。这项研究探讨了这种关系。方法:采用收敛混合方法进行研究。定量部分采用《药物信念问卷》、《药物感知敏感性量表》和《适当用药自我效能感量表》对253名被试进行药物认知评价。依从性采用Morisky四项药物依从性量表进行测量。在定性部分,同时对定量队列中的37名参与者进行了访谈。使用内容分析确定oaa的感知。研究结果通过并排比较和联合显示进行整合。结果:定量数据显示,58.89%的患者认为黏附。依从性患者有较低的伤害信念、较低的药物敏感性和较高的药物自我效能感。定性数据确定了四类感知:尽管存在危险性质,但仍强调OAAs的有效性,在服用OAAs时经历负面情绪,承担OAAs日常管理的责任,以及在服用OAAs时遇到多种障碍。关于伤害信念、感知药物敏感性、药物自我效能和依从性之间的关系,定性研究结果补充了定量研究结果;然而,他们揭示了必要性信念、关注信念和坚持信念之间的不一致。结论:针对用药认知的策略可促进OAAs的依从性,特别是针对改变负面用药信念和情绪、增强用药自我效能感和提高自我管理能力的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信