Prophylactic Inhaled Antibiotics for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Mortality Outcomes.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s00408-025-00827-1
Carlos Valladares, Bryan Gregory, Sheilabi Seeburun, Ahmed Dawood Al Mahrizi, Shreya Shambhavi, Adam Kaplan, Wajahat Khan
{"title":"Prophylactic Inhaled Antibiotics for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Mortality Outcomes.","authors":"Carlos Valladares, Bryan Gregory, Sheilabi Seeburun, Ahmed Dawood Al Mahrizi, Shreya Shambhavi, Adam Kaplan, Wajahat Khan","doi":"10.1007/s00408-025-00827-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common ICU complication linked to high morbidity and mortality. Inhaled antibiotics may offer targeted prophylaxis, but their effectiveness has shown mixed results. This study aims to further evaluate whether inhaled antibiotics reduce VAP incidence and ICU mortality through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the most updated available evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Multiple databases were searched for studies published up to November 14, 2024. Ten studies including 2876 patients (1485 intervention; 1391 control) met inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled risk ratios (RR) for VAP incidence and ICU mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence via GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inhaled antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of VAP compared to controls (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58-0.77; p < 0.001), but showed no significant effect on ICU mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.79-1.06; p = 0.25). Moderate heterogeneity was observed in VAP outcomes (I<sup>2</sup> = 46.8%), while mortality analysis showed no heterogeneity. Funnel plot analysis suggested minimal publication bias, and GRADE rated the evidence as moderate in certainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inhaled antibiotics significantly reduce VAP incidence but show no clear mortality benefit. While promising for prevention, their survival impact remains uncertain. Clinical use should consider patient context and microbial patterns for targeted approach. Future research should identify high-risk subgroups, assess long-term outcomes, and evaluate antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":"203 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-025-00827-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common ICU complication linked to high morbidity and mortality. Inhaled antibiotics may offer targeted prophylaxis, but their effectiveness has shown mixed results. This study aims to further evaluate whether inhaled antibiotics reduce VAP incidence and ICU mortality through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the most updated available evidence.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Multiple databases were searched for studies published up to November 14, 2024. Ten studies including 2876 patients (1485 intervention; 1391 control) met inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled risk ratios (RR) for VAP incidence and ICU mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence via GRADE.

Results: Inhaled antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of VAP compared to controls (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58-0.77; p < 0.001), but showed no significant effect on ICU mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.79-1.06; p = 0.25). Moderate heterogeneity was observed in VAP outcomes (I2 = 46.8%), while mortality analysis showed no heterogeneity. Funnel plot analysis suggested minimal publication bias, and GRADE rated the evidence as moderate in certainty.

Conclusion: Inhaled antibiotics significantly reduce VAP incidence but show no clear mortality benefit. While promising for prevention, their survival impact remains uncertain. Clinical use should consider patient context and microbial patterns for targeted approach. Future research should identify high-risk subgroups, assess long-term outcomes, and evaluate antibiotic resistance.

预防性吸入抗生素治疗呼吸机相关肺炎:发病率和死亡率结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是ICU常见的并发症,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。吸入抗生素可能提供有针对性的预防,但其有效性显示出好坏参半的结果。本研究旨在通过对现有最新证据的系统回顾和荟萃分析,进一步评估吸入抗生素是否能降低VAP发病率和ICU死亡率。方法:按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价。在多个数据库中检索了截至2024年11月14日发表的研究。10项研究纳入2876例患者(干预1485例;1391对照)符合纳入标准。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计VAP发病率和ICU死亡率的合并风险比(RR)。使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险,通过GRADE评估证据确定性。结果:与对照组相比,吸入抗生素可显著降低VAP的发生率(RR = 0.67;95% ci: 0.58-0.77;P 2 = 46.8%),死亡率分析无异质性。漏斗图分析显示发表偏倚最小,GRADE将证据评定为中等确定性。结论:吸入抗生素可显著降低VAP发生率,但无明显的死亡率获益。虽然有希望预防,但它们对生存的影响仍然不确定。临床使用应考虑患者的情况和微生物模式的靶向方法。未来的研究应确定高风险亚群,评估长期结果,并评估抗生素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信