Comparing the accuracy of the urinary tract infection symptom assessment and the acute cystitis symptom score questionnaires in diagnosis of acute uncomplicated cystitis in women.
Yi-Ju Chou, Shang-Jen Chang, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
{"title":"Comparing the accuracy of the urinary tract infection symptom assessment and the acute cystitis symptom score questionnaires in diagnosis of acute uncomplicated cystitis in women.","authors":"Yi-Ju Chou, Shang-Jen Chang, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang","doi":"10.4111/icu.20240380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of two commonly used questionnaires in diagnosing acute cystitis, i.e., the urinary tract infection symptom assessment (UTISA) and the acute cystitis symptom score (ACSS) questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From April 2021 to December 2022, we enrolled female patients with suspected symptoms of acute cystitis as the patient group. As a control group, we included asymptomatic females who came to the hospital for health check-ups. We calculated the accuracy of the two questionnaires in diagnosing acute cystitis and compared the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) of the two through the DeLong test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 and 43 participants were recruited for the patient and control groups, respectively. Both questionnaires include six symptoms: frequency, urgency, dysuria, incomplete bladder emptying, lower abdominal pain, and hematuria to diagnose acute cystitis. However, UTISA includes lower back pain as the 7th symptom. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of UTISA and ACSS were 85.4% versus 75.3% (p=0.091), 93.0% versus 93.0% (p>0.999), and 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) versus 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.94) (p<0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UTISA questionnaire demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ACSS questionnaire. ACSS has lower sensitivity probably due to its limited assessment of low back pain and the objective definition of the severity of frequency that prevents patients from responding based on subjective severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14522,"journal":{"name":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","volume":"66 4","pages":"352-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20240380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of two commonly used questionnaires in diagnosing acute cystitis, i.e., the urinary tract infection symptom assessment (UTISA) and the acute cystitis symptom score (ACSS) questionnaires.
Materials and methods: From April 2021 to December 2022, we enrolled female patients with suspected symptoms of acute cystitis as the patient group. As a control group, we included asymptomatic females who came to the hospital for health check-ups. We calculated the accuracy of the two questionnaires in diagnosing acute cystitis and compared the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) of the two through the DeLong test.
Results: A total of 89 and 43 participants were recruited for the patient and control groups, respectively. Both questionnaires include six symptoms: frequency, urgency, dysuria, incomplete bladder emptying, lower abdominal pain, and hematuria to diagnose acute cystitis. However, UTISA includes lower back pain as the 7th symptom. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of UTISA and ACSS were 85.4% versus 75.3% (p=0.091), 93.0% versus 93.0% (p>0.999), and 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) versus 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.94) (p<0.001), respectively.
Conclusions: UTISA questionnaire demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ACSS questionnaire. ACSS has lower sensitivity probably due to its limited assessment of low back pain and the objective definition of the severity of frequency that prevents patients from responding based on subjective severity.
目的:比较尿路感染症状评估(UTISA)和急性膀胱炎症状评分(ACSS)两种常用的诊断急性膀胱炎问卷的准确性。材料与方法:于2021年4月至2022年12月选取疑似急性膀胱炎症状的女性患者作为患者组。作为对照组,我们纳入了来医院进行健康检查的无症状女性。计算两份问卷诊断急性膀胱炎的准确率,并通过DeLong检验比较两者曲线下面积(AUC)的差异。结果:患者组和对照组分别招募了89名和43名参与者。两份问卷都包括六个症状:尿频、尿急、排尿困难、膀胱排空不全、下腹痛和血尿来诊断急性膀胱炎。然而,UTISA将腰痛列为第7种症状。UTISA和ACSS的敏感性、特异度和AUC分别为85.4%对75.3% (p=0.091)、93.0%对93.0% (p= 0.999)、0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99)对0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.94)(结论:UTISA问卷比ACSS问卷具有更高的诊断准确性。ACSS的敏感性较低,可能是由于其对腰痛的评估有限,以及对频率严重程度的客观定义,使患者无法根据主观严重程度作出反应。
期刊介绍:
Investigative and Clinical Urology (Investig Clin Urol, ICUrology) is an international, peer-reviewed, platinum open access journal published bimonthly. ICUrology aims to provide outstanding scientific and clinical research articles, that will advance knowledge and understanding of urological diseases and current therapeutic treatments. ICUrology publishes Original Articles, Rapid Communications, Review Articles, Special Articles, Innovations in Urology, Editorials, and Letters to the Editor, with a focus on the following areas of expertise:
• Precision Medicine in Urology
• Urological Oncology
• Robotics/Laparoscopy
• Endourology/Urolithiasis
• Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
• Female Urology
• Sexual Dysfunction/Infertility
• Infection/Inflammation
• Reconstruction/Transplantation
• Geriatric Urology
• Pediatric Urology
• Basic/Translational Research
One of the notable features of ICUrology is the application of multimedia platforms facilitating easy-to-access online video clips of newly developed surgical techniques from the journal''s website, by a QR (quick response) code located in the article, or via YouTube. ICUrology provides current and highly relevant knowledge to a broad audience at the cutting edge of urological research and clinical practice.