Indirect Treatment Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis When Compared with no Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s40121-025-01172-9
Neil Hawkins, Paul O'Brien, Juliette Thompson, Sarah-Jane Anderson, Eric Manalastas, Laure Dupont-Benjamin, Melanie Schroeder
{"title":"Indirect Treatment Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis When Compared with no Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention.","authors":"Neil Hawkins, Paul O'Brien, Juliette Thompson, Sarah-Jane Anderson, Eric Manalastas, Laure Dupont-Benjamin, Melanie Schroeder","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01172-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficacy of long-acting injectable cabotegravir (hereafter referred to as cabotegravir) versus daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was demonstrated in two phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), HPTN 083 and HPTN 084. As these trials did not have a no-PrEP group, this analysis aimed to perform an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of cabotegravir versus no PrEP via the common comparator of oral TDF/FTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review identifying trials of oral or both oral and injectable PrEP reporting HIV acquisition and oral PrEP adherence, measured by detectable TDF/FTC plasma levels, was conducted (November 1, 2023). Heterogeneity in oral TDF/FTC adherence level between trials was expected to confound ITC estimates; therefore, a meta-regression of adherence and resulting oral PrEP effectiveness, or reduction in HIV acquisition, was incorporated into an ITC using a joint Bayesian model framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included ten RCTs. The meta-regression showed a strong relationship between oral TDF/FTC adherence and effectiveness. The predicted effectiveness of oral TDF/FTC versus no PrEP was greater for HPTN 083 (77%) compared with HPTN 084 (47%), reflecting the higher level of adherence observed in HTPN 083 (86%) compared with HPTN 084 (56%). Based on the ITC, the predicted effectiveness of cabotegravir versus no PrEP was similar for both populations investigated in HPTN 083 (92%) and HPTN 084 (93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ITC of cabotegravir versus no PrEP predicted similar estimates of cabotegravir effectiveness in the HPTN 083 and 084 trials, suggesting a very high level of efficacy despite differences in population, setting, underlying rate of HIV acquisition, and oral TDF/FTC adherence. These estimates support the generalizability of the cabotegravir results from both HPTN trials to other populations and regions than those in which these trials were conducted. Graphical abstract available for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1739-1753"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01172-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy of long-acting injectable cabotegravir (hereafter referred to as cabotegravir) versus daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was demonstrated in two phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), HPTN 083 and HPTN 084. As these trials did not have a no-PrEP group, this analysis aimed to perform an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of cabotegravir versus no PrEP via the common comparator of oral TDF/FTC.

Methods: A systematic literature review identifying trials of oral or both oral and injectable PrEP reporting HIV acquisition and oral PrEP adherence, measured by detectable TDF/FTC plasma levels, was conducted (November 1, 2023). Heterogeneity in oral TDF/FTC adherence level between trials was expected to confound ITC estimates; therefore, a meta-regression of adherence and resulting oral PrEP effectiveness, or reduction in HIV acquisition, was incorporated into an ITC using a joint Bayesian model framework.

Results: The analysis included ten RCTs. The meta-regression showed a strong relationship between oral TDF/FTC adherence and effectiveness. The predicted effectiveness of oral TDF/FTC versus no PrEP was greater for HPTN 083 (77%) compared with HPTN 084 (47%), reflecting the higher level of adherence observed in HTPN 083 (86%) compared with HPTN 084 (56%). Based on the ITC, the predicted effectiveness of cabotegravir versus no PrEP was similar for both populations investigated in HPTN 083 (92%) and HPTN 084 (93%).

Conclusions: The ITC of cabotegravir versus no PrEP predicted similar estimates of cabotegravir effectiveness in the HPTN 083 and 084 trials, suggesting a very high level of efficacy despite differences in population, setting, underlying rate of HIV acquisition, and oral TDF/FTC adherence. These estimates support the generalizability of the cabotegravir results from both HPTN trials to other populations and regions than those in which these trials were conducted. Graphical abstract available for this article.

长效注射卡博特韦进行暴露前预防与不进行暴露前预防的间接治疗比较。
两项3期随机对照试验HPTN 083和HPTN 084证明了长效注射卡博特韦(以下简称卡博特韦)与每日口服富马酸替诺福韦二氧丙酯/恩曲他滨(TDF/FTC)在暴露前预防(PrEP)方面的疗效。由于这些试验没有无PrEP组,本分析旨在通过口服TDF/FTC的共同比较物对卡博特韦与无PrEP进行间接治疗比较(ITC)。方法:2023年11月1日进行了一项系统的文献综述,确定了口服或口服和注射PrEP报告HIV感染和口服PrEP依从性的试验,通过检测TDF/FTC血浆水平来测量。试验之间口服TDF/FTC依从性水平的异质性预计会混淆ITC的估计;因此,使用联合贝叶斯模型框架将依从性和由此产生的口服PrEP有效性或减少艾滋病毒感染的meta回归纳入ITC。结果:纳入10项随机对照试验。meta回归显示口服TDF/FTC依从性与疗效之间存在很强的关系。口服TDF/FTC与不使用PrEP相比,HPTN 083的预测有效性(77%)高于HPTN 084(47%),这反映了HTPN 083的依从性(86%)高于HPTN 084(56%)。基于ITC,在HPTN 083(92%)和HPTN 084(93%)两组调查的人群中,cabotegravir与无PrEP的预测有效性相似。结论:在HPTN 083和084试验中,cabotegravir与无PrEP的ITC预测了相似的cabotegravir有效性,表明尽管在人群、环境、潜在HIV感染率和口服TDF/FTC依从性方面存在差异,但仍具有非常高的疗效。这些估计支持了两项HPTN试验的卡波特韦结果在其他人群和地区的普遍性,而不是在进行这些试验的人群和地区。本文提供图形摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信