Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based software in detecting supernumerary and congenitally missing teeth in panoramic radiographs.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Miltiadis A Makrygiannakis, Kostis Giannakopoulos, Argyro Kavadella, Dimitrios Paraskevis, Eleftherios G Kaklamanos
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based software in detecting supernumerary and congenitally missing teeth in panoramic radiographs.","authors":"Miltiadis A Makrygiannakis, Kostis Giannakopoulos, Argyro Kavadella, Dimitrios Paraskevis, Eleftherios G Kaklamanos","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Recent advances in AI have enabled its application in dentistry. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of an AI-based model (Diagnocat™) in detecting congenitally missing and supernumerary teeth on panoramic radiographs.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>Three groups of 50 orthopantomograms each-control, congenitally missing, and supernumerary teeth-were evaluated by two human observers and Diagnocat™. Diagnostic performance was compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank and McNemar's tests. Agreement was measured using Cohen's Kappa, and diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) were computed using IBM SPSS 29.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For congenitally missing teeth, Cohen's Kappa indicated strong agreement (0.91); however, significant differences were found in the diagnostic performance (p < 0.01). The model exhibited 84.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, 100.0% PPV, and 99.4% NPV. For supernumerary teeth, the agreement was moderate (Kappa = 0.60), with significant differences in the diagnostic performance (p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 43.9%, while specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100.0%, 100.0%, and 98.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Using convenience sampling and a retrospective design may affect generalizability and applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Although the AI-based model shows promise, it is not yet able to replace human assessment as the standard for detecting missing and supernumerary teeth in panoramic radiographs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Recent advances in AI have enabled its application in dentistry. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of an AI-based model (Diagnocat™) in detecting congenitally missing and supernumerary teeth on panoramic radiographs.

Materials/methods: Three groups of 50 orthopantomograms each-control, congenitally missing, and supernumerary teeth-were evaluated by two human observers and Diagnocat™. Diagnostic performance was compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank and McNemar's tests. Agreement was measured using Cohen's Kappa, and diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) were computed using IBM SPSS 29.0.

Results: For congenitally missing teeth, Cohen's Kappa indicated strong agreement (0.91); however, significant differences were found in the diagnostic performance (p < 0.01). The model exhibited 84.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, 100.0% PPV, and 99.4% NPV. For supernumerary teeth, the agreement was moderate (Kappa = 0.60), with significant differences in the diagnostic performance (p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 43.9%, while specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100.0%, 100.0%, and 98.9%, respectively.

Limitations: Using convenience sampling and a retrospective design may affect generalizability and applicability.

Conclusions/implications: Although the AI-based model shows promise, it is not yet able to replace human assessment as the standard for detecting missing and supernumerary teeth in panoramic radiographs.

基于人工智能的软件在全景x线片上检测多余和先天性缺牙的诊断准确性。
背景/目标:人工智能的最新进展使其能够应用于牙科。本研究评估了基于人工智能的模型(Diagnocat™)在全景x线片上检测先天性缺牙和多牙的诊断准确性。材料/方法:由两名人类观察员和diagnostics™对三组各50张的正畸层析片(对照组、先天性缺牙和多牙)进行评估。使用Wilcoxon sign Rank和McNemar检验比较诊断性能。使用Cohen’s Kappa法测量一致性,使用IBM SPSS 29.0计算诊断指标(敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV))。结果:对于先天性缺牙,Cohen’s Kappa结果吻合度高(0.91);然而,在诊断性能方面发现了显著差异(p)局限性:使用方便抽样和回顾性设计可能会影响通用性和适用性。结论/意义:尽管基于人工智能的模型显示出前景,但它还不能取代人类评估作为检测全景x线片中缺失和多余牙齿的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信