Panel Testing of BRAF Mutation, RAS Mutation, and RET/PTC Rearrangements or RET Mutation Using Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens in Evaluation of Thyroid Carcinoma.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Zhaohui Zhu, Hailei Tong, Xu Qian, Meiling Xue, Aijun Sun, Yifei Yin, Weimin Sun, Ling Mao
{"title":"Panel Testing of BRAF Mutation, RAS Mutation, and RET/PTC Rearrangements or RET Mutation Using Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens in Evaluation of Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Zhaohui Zhu, Hailei Tong, Xu Qian, Meiling Xue, Aijun Sun, Yifei Yin, Weimin Sun, Ling Mao","doi":"10.1002/dc.25500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is a common malignancy of the endocrine system. This research investigates the value of multiple gene detection in evaluating the pathological features of TC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study includes samples from 213 participants who underwent fine-needle aspiration, among whom 176 were diagnosed as TC and 37 with benign lesions. All patients underwent polygenic (BRAF, RAS, and RET) mutation detection. The surgical and pathological results were used as the gold standard to analyze the correlation between different gene mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of multigene panel testing were remarkably superior to those of BRAF, RAS, and RET alone, whereas the omission diagnosis rate was lower than that of BRAF, RAS, and RET alone. The diagnostic area under the curve of BRAF, RAS, RET, and combined detection for TC was 0.8871, 0.5468, 0.5717, and 0.9396, respectively; RAS and RET gene mutation was closely related to the lymph node metastasis of the enrolled patients (p < 0.05). Mutation status for both single-gene testing and multigene panel testing closely correlated with the histological subtype of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While BRAF mutations are associated with papillary TC, RAS mutations are more common in follicular TC, and RET mutations are common in medullary TC. Combined detection of RAS and RET gene mutations in TC has a certain correlation with the disease's pathological characteristics, which provides new ideas and measures for the subsequent diagnosis and evaluation of TC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is a common malignancy of the endocrine system. This research investigates the value of multiple gene detection in evaluating the pathological features of TC.

Methods: This retrospective study includes samples from 213 participants who underwent fine-needle aspiration, among whom 176 were diagnosed as TC and 37 with benign lesions. All patients underwent polygenic (BRAF, RAS, and RET) mutation detection. The surgical and pathological results were used as the gold standard to analyze the correlation between different gene mutations.

Results: The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of multigene panel testing were remarkably superior to those of BRAF, RAS, and RET alone, whereas the omission diagnosis rate was lower than that of BRAF, RAS, and RET alone. The diagnostic area under the curve of BRAF, RAS, RET, and combined detection for TC was 0.8871, 0.5468, 0.5717, and 0.9396, respectively; RAS and RET gene mutation was closely related to the lymph node metastasis of the enrolled patients (p < 0.05). Mutation status for both single-gene testing and multigene panel testing closely correlated with the histological subtype of the patients.

Conclusion: While BRAF mutations are associated with papillary TC, RAS mutations are more common in follicular TC, and RET mutations are common in medullary TC. Combined detection of RAS and RET gene mutations in TC has a certain correlation with the disease's pathological characteristics, which provides new ideas and measures for the subsequent diagnosis and evaluation of TC.

使用细针穿刺标本评估甲状腺癌的BRAF突变、RAS突变、RET/PTC重排或RET突变的小组检测
目的:甲状腺癌是一种常见的内分泌系统恶性肿瘤。本研究探讨多基因检测在评估TC病理特征中的价值。方法:本回顾性研究包括213例接受细针穿刺的患者,其中176例诊断为TC, 37例为良性病变。所有患者都进行了多基因(BRAF、RAS和RET)突变检测。以手术和病理结果为金标准,分析不同基因突变之间的相关性。结果:多基因面板检测的诊断准确性和敏感性明显优于BRAF、RAS和RET单独检测,漏诊率低于BRAF、RAS和RET单独检测。BRAF、RAS、RET、联合检测TC的曲线下诊断面积分别为0.8871、0.5468、0.5717、0.9396;RAS和RET基因突变与入组患者的淋巴结转移密切相关(p结论:BRAF突变与乳头状TC相关,RAS突变多见于滤泡性TC, RET突变多见于髓质性TC。联合检测TC中RAS和RET基因突变与疾病的病理特征有一定的相关性,为TC的后续诊断和评价提供了新的思路和措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信