From colonizer to culprit: genomic and clinical insights into S. epidermidis from post-surgical endophthalmitis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Susanna Sagerfors, Leandro Andrés Escobar-Herrera, Thor Bech Johannesen, Marc Stegger, Bo Söderquist
{"title":"From colonizer to culprit: genomic and clinical insights into S. epidermidis from post-surgical endophthalmitis.","authors":"Susanna Sagerfors, Leandro Andrés Escobar-Herrera, Thor Bech Johannesen, Marc Stegger, Bo Söderquist","doi":"10.1007/s10096-025-05206-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the clinical characteristics of exogenous episodes of endophthalmitis from which Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated by vitreous cultures. We also explored the genomic traits of these S. epidermidis isolates and their relatedness to S. epidermidis originating from carriers and from prosthetic joint infections in the same geographical region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>S. epidermidis isolated from cases of exogenous endophthalmitis (n = 33) were genome sequenced. Clinical features were retrospectively collected from medical records. The isolates were compared with previously sequenced S. epidermidis isolates from the nares of healthy individuals (n = 151) and from prosthetic joint infections (n = 138).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common ophthalmological procedure preceding the endophthalmitis was a posterior segment surgery (76%; 25/33), mainly intravitreal injection (70%; 23/33). These patients displayed a significantly shorter time to symptoms compared to those with an anterior segment surgery (median 3 vs. 9 days; p < 0.001), and significantly less phenotypic methicillin resistance (8%, n = 2/25 vs. 50%, n = 4/8; p = 0.02). Most isolates of S. epidermidis originating from endophthalmitis cases did not belong to known healthcare-associated lineages and did not cluster with isolates from prosthetic joint infections. Rather, they were more similar to isolates from the nares of healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genomic data suggest that the S. epidermidis isolated from the vitreous of Swedish cases of postsurgical endophthalmitis may originate from the commensal flora of the individual, and not from the healthcare facilities. The type of preceding surgical procedure (anterior vs. posterior segment) may influence both symptom delay and the presence or absence of methicillin resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"2409-2420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05206-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the clinical characteristics of exogenous episodes of endophthalmitis from which Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated by vitreous cultures. We also explored the genomic traits of these S. epidermidis isolates and their relatedness to S. epidermidis originating from carriers and from prosthetic joint infections in the same geographical region.

Methods: S. epidermidis isolated from cases of exogenous endophthalmitis (n = 33) were genome sequenced. Clinical features were retrospectively collected from medical records. The isolates were compared with previously sequenced S. epidermidis isolates from the nares of healthy individuals (n = 151) and from prosthetic joint infections (n = 138).

Results: The most common ophthalmological procedure preceding the endophthalmitis was a posterior segment surgery (76%; 25/33), mainly intravitreal injection (70%; 23/33). These patients displayed a significantly shorter time to symptoms compared to those with an anterior segment surgery (median 3 vs. 9 days; p < 0.001), and significantly less phenotypic methicillin resistance (8%, n = 2/25 vs. 50%, n = 4/8; p = 0.02). Most isolates of S. epidermidis originating from endophthalmitis cases did not belong to known healthcare-associated lineages and did not cluster with isolates from prosthetic joint infections. Rather, they were more similar to isolates from the nares of healthy individuals.

Conclusions: Genomic data suggest that the S. epidermidis isolated from the vitreous of Swedish cases of postsurgical endophthalmitis may originate from the commensal flora of the individual, and not from the healthcare facilities. The type of preceding surgical procedure (anterior vs. posterior segment) may influence both symptom delay and the presence or absence of methicillin resistance.

从殖民者到罪魁祸首:术后眼内炎引起的表皮葡萄球菌的基因组和临床研究。
目的:探讨玻璃体培养分离表皮葡萄球菌的外源性眼内炎的临床特点。我们还研究了这些表皮葡萄球菌分离株的基因组特征,以及它们与来自同一地理区域的携带者和假体关节感染的表皮葡萄球菌的亲缘关系。方法:对33例外源性眼内炎患者分离的表皮葡萄球菌进行基因组测序。回顾性收集医疗记录的临床特征。将分离株与先前测序的健康个体(n = 151)和假体关节感染(n = 138)的表皮葡萄球菌分离株进行比较。结果:眼内炎前最常见的眼科手术是眼后段手术(76%;25/33),主要是玻璃体内注射(70%;23/33)。与前段手术患者相比,这些患者出现症状的时间明显缩短(中位3天vs. 9天;结论:基因组数据表明,从瑞典术后眼内炎病例的玻璃体中分离出的表皮葡萄球菌可能来自个体的共生菌群,而不是来自医疗机构。术前手术类型(前段还是后段)可能影响症状延迟和甲氧西林耐药性的存在与否。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信