Determinants of mid-term response to left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yang Ye, Yu Zhang, Yankai Mao, Chan Yu, Miao Ye, Xiaoting Li, Jialin He, Bei Wang, Ying Yang, Min Wang, Dongwu Lai, Xiaohong Zhou, Zhongke Huang, Min-Fu Yang, Guo-Sheng Fu
{"title":"Determinants of mid-term response to left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.","authors":"Yang Ye, Yu Zhang, Yankai Mao, Chan Yu, Miao Ye, Xiaoting Li, Jialin He, Bei Wang, Ying Yang, Min Wang, Dongwu Lai, Xiaohong Zhou, Zhongke Huang, Min-Fu Yang, Guo-Sheng Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.06.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Response to left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) varies in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). We aimed to investigate whether clinical response to LBBP was associated with ventricular electricity, volume and myocardial glucose uptake in non-ischæmic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with LBBB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive NICM patients who received LBBP with successful LBBB correction were prospectively enrolled. Electrocardiography QRS duration (QRSd) and echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) volume were measured. Myocardial glucose uptake was accessed by <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. The standardized uptake value (SUV) and target to background ratio (TBR) of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months of LBBP, twenty-four patients responded to LBBP (LV end-systolic volume reduction (ΔLVESV%): 31.7±18.7%) and twelve did not (ΔLVESV%: 1.9±1.3%) though comparable QRSd reduction (ΔQRSd) by LBBP were observed (ΔQRSd by 55.57±16.93ms in the response group vs 57.40 ±17.69ms in the non-response group, p=0.780). While the univariate logistic regression model identified risk factors (baseline QRSd, R-wave peak time, LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LVESV, TBRmean-septum, SUVmax-septum, p<0.05) for non-responders, only LVEDV (OR 1.32 (1.18-1.48, p=0.025) and TBRmean-septum (OR 0.85 (0.783-0.931, p=0.005) were predictors of non-responders in the multivariate logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBP significantly shortened QRSd in NICM patients with LBBB, however, 6-month clinical response to LBBP varied with 33% non-responders. Larger LVEDV and more depressed glucose uptake were associated with higher odds of LBBP non-responders than the electrical variables of QRSd and ΔQRSd. Besides ventricular electrical desynchrony, volume and myocardial metabolism should be considered for choice of pacing therapy (Public registration: ChiCTR2300070954).</p>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.06.071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Response to left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) varies in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). We aimed to investigate whether clinical response to LBBP was associated with ventricular electricity, volume and myocardial glucose uptake in non-ischæmic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with LBBB.

Methods: Consecutive NICM patients who received LBBP with successful LBBB correction were prospectively enrolled. Electrocardiography QRS duration (QRSd) and echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) volume were measured. Myocardial glucose uptake was accessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. The standardized uptake value (SUV) and target to background ratio (TBR) of 18F-FDG uptake were analyzed.

Results: After 6 months of LBBP, twenty-four patients responded to LBBP (LV end-systolic volume reduction (ΔLVESV%): 31.7±18.7%) and twelve did not (ΔLVESV%: 1.9±1.3%) though comparable QRSd reduction (ΔQRSd) by LBBP were observed (ΔQRSd by 55.57±16.93ms in the response group vs 57.40 ±17.69ms in the non-response group, p=0.780). While the univariate logistic regression model identified risk factors (baseline QRSd, R-wave peak time, LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LVESV, TBRmean-septum, SUVmax-septum, p<0.05) for non-responders, only LVEDV (OR 1.32 (1.18-1.48, p=0.025) and TBRmean-septum (OR 0.85 (0.783-0.931, p=0.005) were predictors of non-responders in the multivariate logistic regression model.

Conclusions: LBBP significantly shortened QRSd in NICM patients with LBBB, however, 6-month clinical response to LBBP varied with 33% non-responders. Larger LVEDV and more depressed glucose uptake were associated with higher odds of LBBP non-responders than the electrical variables of QRSd and ΔQRSd. Besides ventricular electrical desynchrony, volume and myocardial metabolism should be considered for choice of pacing therapy (Public registration: ChiCTR2300070954).

心衰左束支阻滞患者左束支起搏中期反应的决定因素。
背景:左束支阻滞(LBBB)患者对左束支起搏(LBBP)的反应不同。我们的目的是研究LBBB患者对LBBP的临床反应是否与心室电、容量和心肌葡萄糖摄取有关。方法:前瞻性纳入连续NICM接受LBBP并成功矫正LBBB的患者。测量心电图QRS持续时间(QRSd)和超声心动图左室容积(LV)。采用18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描观察心肌葡萄糖摄取情况。分析了18F-FDG的标准摄取值(SUV)和目标与背景比(TBR)。结果:LBBP治疗6个月后,24例患者对LBBP有反应(左室收缩期容积减少(ΔLVESV%): 31.7±18.7%),12例患者无反应(ΔLVESV%: 1.9±1.3%),但观察到LBBP可使QRSd减少(ΔQRSd)(缓解组ΔQRSd减少55.57±16.93ms,非缓解组57.40±17.69ms, p=0.780)。单因素logistic回归模型确定了危险因素(基线QRSd, r波峰值时间,左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV), LVESV, TBRmean-septum, SUVmax-septum, p)。结论:LBBP显著缩短了NICM合并LBBB患者的QRSd,然而,LBBP 6个月的临床反应各不相同,33%无反应。与QRSd和ΔQRSd的电变量相比,更大的LVEDV和更低的葡萄糖摄取与LBBP无反应的几率更高相关。除了室性电不同步外,在选择起搏治疗时还应考虑容积和心肌代谢(公开注册:ChiCTR2300070954)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.10%
发文量
546
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信