Proximal lateral entry technique for the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children and intraoperative nerve protection: a novel technique.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Bufeng Zheng, Wenyu Feng, Lei Geng, Kun Jiang
{"title":"Proximal lateral entry technique for the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children and intraoperative nerve protection: a novel technique.","authors":"Bufeng Zheng, Wenyu Feng, Lei Geng, Kun Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08909-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the proximal lateral-entry pinning technique in the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures and to explore its performance in terms of intraoperative nerve protection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis involved data from pediatric patients with supracondylar humeral fractures who were admitted to the Department of Pediatric Surgery at Binzhou Medical University Hospital between September 2017 and November 2023. A total of 342 patients were included and divided into two groups: Group P (proximal lateral-entry pinning) and Group C (conventional lateral condyle pinning). All patients were followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, the interval from injury to surgery, the operative time, the fracture healing status, and the timing of Kirschner wire removal were recorded. Elbow function was assessed using Flynn's functional and cosmetic criteria. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Complications such as loss of reduction, elbow deformity, vascular injury, iatrogenic nerve injury, and pin-tract infection were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in sex, body weight, age at injury, fracture laterality, anesthesia type, or waiting time from injury to surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, the operative time and timing of Kirschner wire removal did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the proportion of patients with excellent/good elbow function in Group P was 99.42%, which was significantly greater than the proportion of 94.64% observed in Group C (P < 0.05). No radial or ulnar nerve injuries were reported in either group. Three cases of pin-tract infection occurred in Group P, and seven cases occurred in Group C (P > 0.05). Loss of reduction occurred in three cases in Group P and11 in Group C (P > 0.05). No incidences of elbow deformity or iatrogenic vascular injury were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proximal lateral-entry pinning technique yields favorable fracture outcomes and does not increase the risk of radial or ulnar nerve injury when it is performed meticulously. This approach is therefore recommended as a viable surgical technique for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08909-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the proximal lateral-entry pinning technique in the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures and to explore its performance in terms of intraoperative nerve protection.

Methods: This retrospective analysis involved data from pediatric patients with supracondylar humeral fractures who were admitted to the Department of Pediatric Surgery at Binzhou Medical University Hospital between September 2017 and November 2023. A total of 342 patients were included and divided into two groups: Group P (proximal lateral-entry pinning) and Group C (conventional lateral condyle pinning). All patients were followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, the interval from injury to surgery, the operative time, the fracture healing status, and the timing of Kirschner wire removal were recorded. Elbow function was assessed using Flynn's functional and cosmetic criteria. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Complications such as loss of reduction, elbow deformity, vascular injury, iatrogenic nerve injury, and pin-tract infection were also documented.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in sex, body weight, age at injury, fracture laterality, anesthesia type, or waiting time from injury to surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, the operative time and timing of Kirschner wire removal did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the proportion of patients with excellent/good elbow function in Group P was 99.42%, which was significantly greater than the proportion of 94.64% observed in Group C (P < 0.05). No radial or ulnar nerve injuries were reported in either group. Three cases of pin-tract infection occurred in Group P, and seven cases occurred in Group C (P > 0.05). Loss of reduction occurred in three cases in Group P and11 in Group C (P > 0.05). No incidences of elbow deformity or iatrogenic vascular injury were noted.

Conclusion: The proximal lateral-entry pinning technique yields favorable fracture outcomes and does not increase the risk of radial or ulnar nerve injury when it is performed meticulously. This approach is therefore recommended as a viable surgical technique for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

近侧入路技术治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折及术中神经保护:一项新技术。
背景:评价肱骨髁上骨折近端外侧入路钉钉技术的临床疗效,探讨其术中神经保护作用。方法:回顾性分析2017年9月至2023年11月滨州医科大学附属医院儿科外科收治的肱骨髁上骨折患儿的资料。共纳入342例患者,分为两组:P组(近端外侧入路钉钉)和C组(常规外侧髁钉钉)。所有患者术后随访至少6个月。记录基线特征、损伤至手术间隔、手术时间、骨折愈合情况、克氏针拔除时间。使用Flynn's功能和美容标准评估肘部功能。统计比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验、独立样本t检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验(视情况而定)。并发症如复位丢失、肘部畸形、血管损伤、医源性神经损伤和针道感染也有记录。结果:两组患者在性别、体重、伤时年龄、骨折侧位、麻醉方式、伤至手术等待时间等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间克氏针拔除手术时间及时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。末次随访时,P组肘关节功能优良比例为99.42%,显著高于C组的94.64% (P < 0.05)。P组3例复位丧失,C组11例复位丧失(P < 0.05)。没有发生肘部畸形或医源性血管损伤。结论:近侧入路钉钉技术具有良好的骨折效果,并且在精心操作时不会增加桡神经或尺神经损伤的风险。因此,该入路被推荐为治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的可行手术技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信