Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Leptospira Hardjo among commercial dairy cattle farms of Rupandehi district, Nepal.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Tulsi Ram Gompo, Sudiksha Pandit, Deepak Subedi, Ram Chandra Sapkota, Aditi Pandey, Rojina Nepal, Ananda Tiwari, Sumit Jyoti
{"title":"Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Leptospira Hardjo among commercial dairy cattle farms of Rupandehi district, Nepal.","authors":"Tulsi Ram Gompo, Sudiksha Pandit, Deepak Subedi, Ram Chandra Sapkota, Aditi Pandey, Rojina Nepal, Ananda Tiwari, Sumit Jyoti","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04882-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nepal relies on an agrarian-based economy, with the livestock sector contributing significantly to the national GDP. However, diseases like leptospirosis negatively impact cattle production and pose significant zoonotic risks. This study represents the first attempt to evaluate the risk factors of leptospirosis in cattle in Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to April 2020 in 14 administrative units of the Rupandehi district. A total of 367 blood samples were collected from 206 cattle farms using a proportionate sampling procedure. An indirect ELISA was used to detect specific antibodies in serum samples against Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo. Farm management practices and knowledge of zoonotic diseases were assessed through interviews with animal owners from the 206 cattle farms. Regression analyses were conducted to analyze the herd and farm level risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall farm-level seroprevalence of leptospirosis was 4.85% (95% CI: 2.35-8.75), while the animal-level seroprevalence was 3.81% (95% CI: 2.10-6.30). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found that farms with purchased cattle (farms that regularly introduce cattle from other farms) had a borderline significant increase in odds of leptospirosis (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 0.88-59.46, p = 0.065) compared to farms that only keep home-bred cattle. Additionally, larger farms (> 10 animals) were significantly associated with increased odds of leptospirosis (OR: 13.34, 95% CI: 1.64-108.42, p = 0.015) compared to smaller farms (≤ 10 animals). At the animal level, no statistically significant difference was observed in the multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model, which included farm as a random effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of farms with positive serum samples highlights the persistent threat of leptospirosis to cattle production and its occupational hazards within Nepal's dairy sector. Farm-level risk factors, such farms with purchased cattle and larger farm sizes, emphasize the need for targeted control measures. Given the zoonotic nature of the disease and its ecological complexity involving multiple hosts, a One Health approach is essential. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are needed to develop evidence-based policies, strengthen health system preparedness, and implement practical interventions that reduce transmission risks and the overall disease burden in both human and animal populations across the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04882-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nepal relies on an agrarian-based economy, with the livestock sector contributing significantly to the national GDP. However, diseases like leptospirosis negatively impact cattle production and pose significant zoonotic risks. This study represents the first attempt to evaluate the risk factors of leptospirosis in cattle in Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to April 2020 in 14 administrative units of the Rupandehi district. A total of 367 blood samples were collected from 206 cattle farms using a proportionate sampling procedure. An indirect ELISA was used to detect specific antibodies in serum samples against Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo. Farm management practices and knowledge of zoonotic diseases were assessed through interviews with animal owners from the 206 cattle farms. Regression analyses were conducted to analyze the herd and farm level risk factors.

Results: The overall farm-level seroprevalence of leptospirosis was 4.85% (95% CI: 2.35-8.75), while the animal-level seroprevalence was 3.81% (95% CI: 2.10-6.30). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found that farms with purchased cattle (farms that regularly introduce cattle from other farms) had a borderline significant increase in odds of leptospirosis (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 0.88-59.46, p = 0.065) compared to farms that only keep home-bred cattle. Additionally, larger farms (> 10 animals) were significantly associated with increased odds of leptospirosis (OR: 13.34, 95% CI: 1.64-108.42, p = 0.015) compared to smaller farms (≤ 10 animals). At the animal level, no statistically significant difference was observed in the multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model, which included farm as a random effect.

Conclusion: The detection of farms with positive serum samples highlights the persistent threat of leptospirosis to cattle production and its occupational hazards within Nepal's dairy sector. Farm-level risk factors, such farms with purchased cattle and larger farm sizes, emphasize the need for targeted control measures. Given the zoonotic nature of the disease and its ecological complexity involving multiple hosts, a One Health approach is essential. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are needed to develop evidence-based policies, strengthen health system preparedness, and implement practical interventions that reduce transmission risks and the overall disease burden in both human and animal populations across the country.

尼泊尔Rupandehi地区商业奶牛养殖场中Hardjo钩端螺旋体的血清流行率和相关危险因素
背景:尼泊尔依赖以农业为基础的经济,畜牧业对国家国内生产总值做出了重大贡献。然而,钩端螺旋体病等疾病对牛生产产生负面影响,并构成重大的人畜共患风险。本研究是评估尼泊尔牛钩端螺旋体病危险因素的首次尝试。2019年3月至2020年4月,在鲁潘德希地区的14个行政单位进行了一项横断面研究。采用比例抽样程序从206个牛场共采集了367份血液样本。采用间接酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清样品中疑问钩端螺旋体血清型特异性抗体。通过与206个牛场的动物所有者进行访谈,评估了农场管理做法和人畜共患疾病知识。进行回归分析,分析畜群和养殖场水平的危险因素。结果:猪场水平钩端螺旋体病总体血清阳性率为4.85% (95% CI: 2.35 ~ 8.75),动物水平血清阳性率为3.81% (95% CI: 2.10 ~ 6.30)。通过多变量logistic回归分析,我们发现购买牛的农场(定期从其他农场引进牛的农场)与只饲养家养牛的农场相比,钩端螺旋体病的几率显著增加(OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 0.88-59.46, p = 0.065)。此外,与规模较小的养殖场(≤10头动物)相比,规模较大的养殖场(≤10头动物)患钩端螺旋体病的几率显著增加(OR: 13.34, 95% CI: 1.64-108.42, p = 0.015)。在动物水平上,将农场作为随机效应纳入多变量混合效应logistic回归模型中,差异无统计学意义。结论:对血清样本呈阳性的农场的检测突出了钩端螺旋体病对牛生产的持续威胁及其在尼泊尔乳制品部门的职业危害。农场层面的风险因素,如购买牛的农场和规模较大的农场,强调需要采取有针对性的控制措施。鉴于该疾病的人畜共患性质及其涉及多个宿主的生态复杂性,“同一个健康”方法至关重要。需要利益攸关方之间的合作努力,以制定基于证据的政策,加强卫生系统的准备工作,并实施切实可行的干预措施,以减少全国人畜种群的传播风险和总体疾病负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信