3191 Evaluating a frailty same day emergency care service: patient and family perspectives

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
J Iqbal, R Morton, E Swinnerton, M Saint, L O'Callaghan, J Fox, L Butler, L Tomkow
{"title":"3191 Evaluating a frailty same day emergency care service: patient and family perspectives","authors":"J Iqbal, R Morton, E Swinnerton, M Saint, L O'Callaghan, J Fox, L Butler, L Tomkow","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf133.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Frailty is a growing concern, particularly for older adults attending Emergency Departments (EDs). Frailty accounts for 5–10% of all ED visits and up to 30% of acute admissions. The NHS mandates that hospitals with Type 1 EDs provide a minimum of 70 hours of Acute Frailty Services per week to address this challenge. At Salford Royal Foundation Trust (SRFT), a Frailty Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) service was introduced to deliver rapid assessment and care for frail older adults, aiming to reduce hospital admissions and improve patient outcomes. This service operates five days per week and is staffed by a multidisciplinary team. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the Frailty SDEC service. Data was collected through paper surveys distributed to patients aged 65 years or older with a Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) >5 and their relatives or carers during their admission to the SDEC service. The survey included both closed-ended and open-ended questions. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results A total of 32 responses were collected over a two-month period in 2024. The results showed high levels of patient and family satisfaction (97%) with the Frailty SDEC service. Participants particularly valued the compassionate and personalised care, clear and professional communication, and the efficient and timely service delivery. Areas for improvement included upgrading the physical environment and providing clearer communication about waiting times and procedures. Conclusion The Frailty SDEC service at SRFT demonstrates high levels of patient satisfaction and effectiveness in delivering care for frail older adults. This evaluation provides valuable insights for enhancing patient-centred care and highlights the importance of further research to explore long-term outcomes and compare different models of SDEC services for older adults.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf133.049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Frailty is a growing concern, particularly for older adults attending Emergency Departments (EDs). Frailty accounts for 5–10% of all ED visits and up to 30% of acute admissions. The NHS mandates that hospitals with Type 1 EDs provide a minimum of 70 hours of Acute Frailty Services per week to address this challenge. At Salford Royal Foundation Trust (SRFT), a Frailty Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) service was introduced to deliver rapid assessment and care for frail older adults, aiming to reduce hospital admissions and improve patient outcomes. This service operates five days per week and is staffed by a multidisciplinary team. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the Frailty SDEC service. Data was collected through paper surveys distributed to patients aged 65 years or older with a Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) >5 and their relatives or carers during their admission to the SDEC service. The survey included both closed-ended and open-ended questions. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results A total of 32 responses were collected over a two-month period in 2024. The results showed high levels of patient and family satisfaction (97%) with the Frailty SDEC service. Participants particularly valued the compassionate and personalised care, clear and professional communication, and the efficient and timely service delivery. Areas for improvement included upgrading the physical environment and providing clearer communication about waiting times and procedures. Conclusion The Frailty SDEC service at SRFT demonstrates high levels of patient satisfaction and effectiveness in delivering care for frail older adults. This evaluation provides valuable insights for enhancing patient-centred care and highlights the importance of further research to explore long-term outcomes and compare different models of SDEC services for older adults.
3191评估体弱多病当日紧急护理服务:病人和家属的观点
虚弱是一个日益受到关注的问题,特别是对于急诊科(EDs)的老年人。虚弱占所有急诊科就诊的5-10%,占急症入院的30%。NHS要求拥有1型急诊科的医院每周提供至少70小时的急性虚弱服务,以应对这一挑战。在索尔福德皇家基金会信托基金(SRFT),虚弱当天紧急护理(SDEC)服务被引入,为虚弱的老年人提供快速评估和护理,旨在减少住院人数并改善患者的治疗效果。这项服务每周运行五天,由一个多学科团队组成。方法采用混合评价方法对脆性SDEC服务进行评价。数据是通过纸质调查收集的,调查对象是年龄在65岁或以上、临床虚弱评分(CFS) >;5的患者及其亲属或护理人员,他们在接受SDEC服务期间接受了调查。该调查包括封闭式和开放式问题。定量数据采用描述性统计分析,定性数据采用专题分析分析。结果在2024年2个月的时间里,共收集了32份问卷。结果显示,患者和家属对虚弱SDEC服务的满意度很高(97%)。参加者特别重视贴心和个人化的护理、清晰和专业的沟通,以及高效和及时的服务。需要改进的领域包括改善实际环境,并就等候时间和程序提供更清晰的沟通。结论SRFT的虚弱SDEC服务在为虚弱的老年人提供护理方面表现出较高的患者满意度和有效性。这项评估为加强以患者为中心的护理提供了有价值的见解,并强调了进一步研究的重要性,以探索长期结果,并比较老年人SDEC服务的不同模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信