3198 Better updates, better care: improving the communication with relatives in geriatric surgical patients

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
E Thomas-Williams, H Flashman, D Bertfield, T Gluck
{"title":"3198 Better updates, better care: improving the communication with relatives in geriatric surgical patients","authors":"E Thomas-Williams, H Flashman, D Bertfield, T Gluck","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf133.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction According to the GMC’s Good Medical Practice, medical professionals have a responsibility to be considerate and compassionate to those close to a patient through giving support and information. For those lacking capacity, clinicians can assume that patients would want those close to them to be kept up to date with their condition. NHS digital data last year showed that 17.1% of written complaints are linked with communication. The primary aim of this project was to increase the percentage of surgical patients aged 65 or over receiving a next of kin (NOK) update. The secondary aim was to decrease the time to NOK update for this patient group to under 48 hours. Method QI methodology and 2 PDSA cycle loops were used. Using the electronic patient record surgical patients aged 65 years or over on two surgical wards were identified. Medical records were checked for documentation of a NOK update. Where a NOK update was documented, time to update from surgical team decision to admit was noted. In those without a documented NOK update, time from clerking was recorded. The percentage of patients receiving an update and mean time to update was calculated. Following the implementation of posters prompting NOK updates, data was recollected. Following a teaching session a third data analysis was undertaken. Results Following the initial intervention the time to NOK update decreased by 78% from 232 hours to 50 hours. The data post second intervention saw an increase in the percentage of NOK updates from 62% pre-interventions to 70% and time to update decreased by a further 5% to 40 hours. Conclusion Implementation of a poster prompt and undertaking a teaching session, highlighting the importance of communication with NOKs, demonstrated improvement in percentage and mean time to NOK updates for our patient cohort on surgical wards.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf133.051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction According to the GMC’s Good Medical Practice, medical professionals have a responsibility to be considerate and compassionate to those close to a patient through giving support and information. For those lacking capacity, clinicians can assume that patients would want those close to them to be kept up to date with their condition. NHS digital data last year showed that 17.1% of written complaints are linked with communication. The primary aim of this project was to increase the percentage of surgical patients aged 65 or over receiving a next of kin (NOK) update. The secondary aim was to decrease the time to NOK update for this patient group to under 48 hours. Method QI methodology and 2 PDSA cycle loops were used. Using the electronic patient record surgical patients aged 65 years or over on two surgical wards were identified. Medical records were checked for documentation of a NOK update. Where a NOK update was documented, time to update from surgical team decision to admit was noted. In those without a documented NOK update, time from clerking was recorded. The percentage of patients receiving an update and mean time to update was calculated. Following the implementation of posters prompting NOK updates, data was recollected. Following a teaching session a third data analysis was undertaken. Results Following the initial intervention the time to NOK update decreased by 78% from 232 hours to 50 hours. The data post second intervention saw an increase in the percentage of NOK updates from 62% pre-interventions to 70% and time to update decreased by a further 5% to 40 hours. Conclusion Implementation of a poster prompt and undertaking a teaching session, highlighting the importance of communication with NOKs, demonstrated improvement in percentage and mean time to NOK updates for our patient cohort on surgical wards.
3198更好的更新,更好的护理:改善老年外科患者与亲属的沟通
根据GMC的良好医疗规范,医疗专业人员有责任通过提供支持和信息来体贴和同情那些与患者亲近的人。对于那些缺乏能力的人,临床医生可以假设患者希望他们身边的人了解他们的最新情况。NHS去年的数字数据显示,17.1%的书面投诉与沟通有关。该项目的主要目的是增加65岁或以上接受近亲(NOK)更新的手术患者的百分比。次要目标是将该患者组的NOK更新时间减少到48小时以下。方法采用QI方法学和2个PDSA循环。使用电子病历对两个外科病房65岁以上的手术患者进行识别。检查了医疗记录以查找NOK更新的文档。若记录了NOK更新,则记录了从手术小组决定入院到更新的时间。在没有记录NOK更新的情况下,记录了从职员开始的时间。计算接受更新的患者百分比和平均更新时间。在实施海报提示NOK更新后,收集了数据。在一次教学之后,进行了第三次数据分析。结果初始干预后,NOK更新时间从232小时减少到50小时,减少了78%。第二次干预后的数据显示,NOK更新的百分比从干预前的62%增加到70%,更新时间进一步减少了5%,降至40小时。结论:实施海报提示和开展教学会议,强调与NOK沟通的重要性,表明我们的外科病房患者队列中NOK更新的百分比和平均时间有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信