3027 Identifying and coding patients appropriate for the Gold Standard Framework on discharge from an inpatient gastroenterology ward

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
K Edwards, C Brighton
{"title":"3027 Identifying and coding patients appropriate for the Gold Standard Framework on discharge from an inpatient gastroenterology ward","authors":"K Edwards, C Brighton","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf133.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A third of hospital inpatients may be in their last year of life and over the past 25 years there has been evidence to show the Gold standard Framework (GSF) reduces hospitalisation and allows more people to live and die in their preferred place of care. Teams undertaking GSF find admissions and lengths of stay are significantly reduced. Our inpatient ward did not have processes to identify those appropriate for the GSF. Aim To identify and code patients appropriate for the gold standard framework on the inpatient gastroenterology ward at Salford Royal. Methods Baseline data was collected, standards were set and data was collected from March 2024 to July 2024 by retrospectively reviewing documentation. Using the PDSA cycle format; the first intervention carried out was an education session. The second intervention was a poster and flow diagram. Other data collected was valuable such as whether the hospital palliative inpatient team had been involved, if advanced care planning discussions had been had and whether community palliative care were informed on discharge. Results Of the 36 patients admitted in the first 2-week period the 11 patients who had a GSF eligible diagnosis were not identified or coded. Following the first and second interventions made 21 further patients were identified as eligible for diagnosis on data collection but no GSF coding was carried out or documentation on the discharge letter. Conclusion The two interventions received positive feedback and engagement however it did not lead to patients being coded. The patients who were reviewed in the Specialist liver disease palliative care MDT (SILP) had referrals placed to the community palliative care team and advanced care planning initiated. Our recommendation was to consider implementing a bundle that suggests referral to the SILP and within the bundle asks for the GSF to be coded.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf133.040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background A third of hospital inpatients may be in their last year of life and over the past 25 years there has been evidence to show the Gold standard Framework (GSF) reduces hospitalisation and allows more people to live and die in their preferred place of care. Teams undertaking GSF find admissions and lengths of stay are significantly reduced. Our inpatient ward did not have processes to identify those appropriate for the GSF. Aim To identify and code patients appropriate for the gold standard framework on the inpatient gastroenterology ward at Salford Royal. Methods Baseline data was collected, standards were set and data was collected from March 2024 to July 2024 by retrospectively reviewing documentation. Using the PDSA cycle format; the first intervention carried out was an education session. The second intervention was a poster and flow diagram. Other data collected was valuable such as whether the hospital palliative inpatient team had been involved, if advanced care planning discussions had been had and whether community palliative care were informed on discharge. Results Of the 36 patients admitted in the first 2-week period the 11 patients who had a GSF eligible diagnosis were not identified or coded. Following the first and second interventions made 21 further patients were identified as eligible for diagnosis on data collection but no GSF coding was carried out or documentation on the discharge letter. Conclusion The two interventions received positive feedback and engagement however it did not lead to patients being coded. The patients who were reviewed in the Specialist liver disease palliative care MDT (SILP) had referrals placed to the community palliative care team and advanced care planning initiated. Our recommendation was to consider implementing a bundle that suggests referral to the SILP and within the bundle asks for the GSF to be coded.
3027在消化内科住院病房出院时识别和编码适合黄金标准框架的患者
背景:三分之一的住院病人可能处于生命的最后一年,在过去的25年里,有证据表明,黄金标准框架(GSF)减少了住院治疗,并允许更多的人在他们喜欢的护理场所生活和死亡。开展GSF的团队发现,住院人数和住院时间大大减少。我们的住院病房没有流程来确定那些适合GSF的患者。目的识别和编码适合索尔福德皇家胃肠病住院病房金标准框架的患者。方法回顾性查阅文献,收集2024年3月至2024年7月的基线资料,制定标准,收集资料。采用PDSA循环格式;第一次干预是一次教育会议。第二个干预措施是海报和流程图。收集的其他数据也很有价值,如医院姑息治疗住院小组是否参与,是否进行了高级护理计划讨论,以及出院时是否通知了社区姑息治疗。结果在前2周入院的36例患者中,11例符合GSF诊断的患者未被识别或编码。在第一次和第二次干预后,又有21例患者通过数据收集被确定为符合诊断条件,但没有进行GSF编码或在出院信上记录。结论两种干预措施均获得了积极的反馈和参与,但并未导致患者被编码。在肝病专科姑息治疗MDT (SILP)中接受审查的患者被转介到社区姑息治疗小组,并启动了高级护理计划。我们的建议是考虑实现一个建议转介到SILP的捆绑包,并在捆绑包中请求对GSF进行编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信