3205 Polypharmacy and quality of life in older people: where do we stand? A narrative review

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
A Healy, H Barry, B McGuinness
{"title":"3205 Polypharmacy and quality of life in older people: where do we stand? A narrative review","authors":"A Healy, H Barry, B McGuinness","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf133.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Health affects older people’s quality of life (QoL). Those experiencing health decline often require multiple medications (polypharmacy). This narrative review aims to explore the effect polypharmacy has on QoL and health-related QoL (HRQoL). We also wished to determine the QoL/HRQoL measurement tools employed and polypharmacy definitions used in included studies. Method Searches were carried out primarily in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Publication databases for The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) were also searched. Search terms such as ‘polypharmacy’, ‘older person’, ‘health-related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ were used. Primary or secondary research articles investigating the association between polypharmacy and QoL/HRQoL, including qualitative studies, QoL/HRQOL tool development studies, and randomised controlled trials investigating the number of medications and QoL/HRQoL as outcomes were included. Screening and data extraction were undertaken by one reviewer and a narrative synthesis conducted. Results In total, 55 articles were included. The key finding of this review was the heterogeneity of the effect of polypharmacy on QoL/HRQoL, ranging from no association to a significant negative clinical association. Considerable variation was seen in the number of QoL/HRQoL measurement tools and polypharmacy definitions used. Qualitative studies highlighted factors which were perceived to impact QoL/HRQoL, including the relationship between patients and healthcare providers, clear benefit of medication and commitment to everyday medication management. These findings highlight the difficulty in interpreting the true impact of polypharmacy on QoL/HRQoL. Conclusion(s) In qualitative research, patients highlight the negative impact of polypharmacy on QoL; however, this isn’t always reflected in quantitative research. The range of differing associations could be due to the responsiveness of the tools used, populations studied, or the nature of the relationship between polypharmacy and QoL, which is likely intertwined bidirectionally with many contributing and confounding factors.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf133.106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Health affects older people’s quality of life (QoL). Those experiencing health decline often require multiple medications (polypharmacy). This narrative review aims to explore the effect polypharmacy has on QoL and health-related QoL (HRQoL). We also wished to determine the QoL/HRQoL measurement tools employed and polypharmacy definitions used in included studies. Method Searches were carried out primarily in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Publication databases for The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) were also searched. Search terms such as ‘polypharmacy’, ‘older person’, ‘health-related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ were used. Primary or secondary research articles investigating the association between polypharmacy and QoL/HRQoL, including qualitative studies, QoL/HRQOL tool development studies, and randomised controlled trials investigating the number of medications and QoL/HRQoL as outcomes were included. Screening and data extraction were undertaken by one reviewer and a narrative synthesis conducted. Results In total, 55 articles were included. The key finding of this review was the heterogeneity of the effect of polypharmacy on QoL/HRQoL, ranging from no association to a significant negative clinical association. Considerable variation was seen in the number of QoL/HRQoL measurement tools and polypharmacy definitions used. Qualitative studies highlighted factors which were perceived to impact QoL/HRQoL, including the relationship between patients and healthcare providers, clear benefit of medication and commitment to everyday medication management. These findings highlight the difficulty in interpreting the true impact of polypharmacy on QoL/HRQoL. Conclusion(s) In qualitative research, patients highlight the negative impact of polypharmacy on QoL; however, this isn’t always reflected in quantitative research. The range of differing associations could be due to the responsiveness of the tools used, populations studied, or the nature of the relationship between polypharmacy and QoL, which is likely intertwined bidirectionally with many contributing and confounding factors.
3205 .老年人的综合用药与生活质量:我们在哪里?叙述性回顾
健康影响老年人生活质量(QoL)。那些经历健康衰退的人通常需要多种药物(综合用药)。本文旨在探讨多药治疗对患者生活质量和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。我们还希望确定纳入研究中使用的QoL/HRQoL测量工具和多药定义。方法主要在MEDLINE和EMBASE中进行检索。还检索了爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)和英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的出版物数据库。搜索词包括“综合用药”、“老年人”、“健康相关的生活质量”和“生活质量”。纳入了调查多种药物治疗与生活质量/HRQoL之间关系的主要或次要研究文章,包括定性研究、生活质量/HRQoL工具开发研究,以及调查药物数量和生活质量/HRQoL作为结果的随机对照试验。筛选和数据提取由一名审稿人进行,并进行叙述综合。结果共纳入55篇文献。本综述的主要发现是多药治疗对QoL/HRQoL影响的异质性,从无关联到显著的临床负相关。在使用的QoL/HRQoL测量工具和多药定义的数量上存在相当大的差异。定性研究强调了被认为影响生活质量/HRQoL的因素,包括患者与医疗保健提供者之间的关系、药物的明显益处和对日常药物管理的承诺。这些发现突出了解释多重用药对生活质量/HRQoL的真正影响的困难。(5)在质性研究中,患者强调多药对生活质量的负面影响;然而,这并不总是反映在定量研究中。不同关联的范围可能是由于所使用的工具的响应性、所研究的人群,或多药与生活质量之间关系的性质,这可能与许多贡献和混杂因素双向交织在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信