The Influence of Hospital Policies on Clinicians' Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Life-sustaining Treatment.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.036
Gina M Piscitello,Edlyn Lopez Wolwowicz,Michael T Huber,Kelly C Vranas,Donald R Sullivan,Katrina E Hauschildt,Patrick G Lyons
{"title":"The Influence of Hospital Policies on Clinicians' Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Life-sustaining Treatment.","authors":"Gina M Piscitello,Edlyn Lopez Wolwowicz,Michael T Huber,Kelly C Vranas,Donald R Sullivan,Katrina E Hauschildt,Patrick G Lyons","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere is considerable variation in clinicians' approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw life sustaining treatment (LST) across US hospitals. These differences are not explained by patient preferences alone and are likely influenced by other factors such as hospital policies, hospital culture, state laws, and medical society guidelines.\r\n\r\nRESEARCH QUESTION\r\nHow do hospital policies influence clinician approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw LST among patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU)?\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN AND METHODS\r\nWe conducted semi-structured interviews with ICU nurses and physicians at three geographically diverse hospital systems across the United States between July and October 2024. We asked clinicians about their experiences with, and perceptions of, hospital policies on withholding or withdrawing LST and the relationship between these policies and clinician decision-making in ethically challenging scenarios.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe interviewed ten nurses and eight attending physicians with median 5 years (range 2-36 years) in practice. Clinicians described limited awareness of, and familiarity with, their hospital's policies that addressed withholding or withdrawing LST. Clinicians with knowledge of these policies could identify their location but described barriers to accessing them. While clinicians perceived hospital policies as helpful in some ways (e.g., legal protection and ethical guidance), they viewed them as neither acknowledging nor addressing sociodemographic disparities or clinician value judgments in LST decision-making. Perceptions varied about whether clinicians followed their own hospital policy guidance when making decisions to withhold or withdraw LST.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nClinicians lack detailed understanding about their hospitals' policies that address withholding or withdrawing LST and perceive these policies as having limited applicability to clinical practice. These findings suggest that hospital policies may have little influence on clinician behavior in addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw LST in ethically challenging scenarios.","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is considerable variation in clinicians' approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw life sustaining treatment (LST) across US hospitals. These differences are not explained by patient preferences alone and are likely influenced by other factors such as hospital policies, hospital culture, state laws, and medical society guidelines. RESEARCH QUESTION How do hospital policies influence clinician approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw LST among patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with ICU nurses and physicians at three geographically diverse hospital systems across the United States between July and October 2024. We asked clinicians about their experiences with, and perceptions of, hospital policies on withholding or withdrawing LST and the relationship between these policies and clinician decision-making in ethically challenging scenarios. RESULTS We interviewed ten nurses and eight attending physicians with median 5 years (range 2-36 years) in practice. Clinicians described limited awareness of, and familiarity with, their hospital's policies that addressed withholding or withdrawing LST. Clinicians with knowledge of these policies could identify their location but described barriers to accessing them. While clinicians perceived hospital policies as helpful in some ways (e.g., legal protection and ethical guidance), they viewed them as neither acknowledging nor addressing sociodemographic disparities or clinician value judgments in LST decision-making. Perceptions varied about whether clinicians followed their own hospital policy guidance when making decisions to withhold or withdraw LST. INTERPRETATION Clinicians lack detailed understanding about their hospitals' policies that address withholding or withdrawing LST and perceive these policies as having limited applicability to clinical practice. These findings suggest that hospital policies may have little influence on clinician behavior in addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw LST in ethically challenging scenarios.
医院政策对临床医生决定停止或撤销维持生命治疗的影响。
背景:在美国各医院,临床医生决定停止或停止生命维持治疗(LST)的方法存在相当大的差异。这些差异不能仅仅由患者的偏好来解释,而且可能受到其他因素的影响,如医院政策、医院文化、州法律和医疗协会指南。研究问题:医院政策如何影响临床医生在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中决定保留或撤回LST的方法?研究设计和方法我们在2024年7月至10月期间对美国三个地理位置不同的医院系统的ICU护士和医生进行了半结构化访谈。我们向临床医生询问了他们对医院关于保留或撤回LST的政策的经验和看法,以及这些政策与临床医生在道德挑战情况下的决策之间的关系。结果访谈10名护士和8名主治医师,中位执业年限为5年(2-36年)。临床医生描述了有限的认识和熟悉,他们的医院的政策,处理扣缴或撤回LST。了解这些政策的临床医生可以确定它们的位置,但描述了访问它们的障碍。虽然临床医生认为医院政策在某些方面(例如法律保护和道德指导)是有帮助的,但他们认为这些政策既不承认也不解决社会人口差异或临床医生在LST决策中的价值判断。对于临床医生在决定保留或撤销LST时是否遵循自己医院的政策指导,人们的看法各不相同。临床医生缺乏对其医院关于扣留或撤回LST的政策的详细了解,并认为这些政策对临床实践的适用性有限。这些研究结果表明,在具有伦理挑战性的情况下,医院政策可能对临床医生决定保留或撤回LST的行为影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信