Nursing students'knowledge and effectiveness of teaching in infection prevention and control.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Stephanie Bouget Mohammedi, Pierre Gillois, Caroline Landelle
{"title":"Nursing students'knowledge and effectiveness of teaching in infection prevention and control.","authors":"Stephanie Bouget Mohammedi, Pierre Gillois, Caroline Landelle","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03316-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In order to prevent healthcare-associated infections, infection prevention and control (IPC) is taught to nursing students in France as soon as they enter the nursing training institutes. The primary objective of this study was to assess the knowledge of standard precautions and hand hygiene of French nursing students before and after training. Secondary objectives were to measure factors predicting success on knowledge tests, and to investigate the effectiveness of the different teaching techniques used.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A quantitative study using online self-administered questionnaires was performed between September 1, 2022 and March 7, 2023 in French nursing training institutes. Three self-administered questionnaires were administered: the first to IPC trainers on their teaching methods, and the next two to nursing students on their knowledge and socio-demographic characteristics, with one questionnaire before and one after IPC training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine nursing training institutes took part in the study. Before and after IPC training, 3,739 and 2,378 nursing students participated, respectively. At the start of training, the mean score on the knowledge test was 35.67 out of 50 ([35.53-35.77] sd = 3.76), i.e. a moderate level of knowledge. After IPC training, the mean score on the knowledge test was 37.55 out of 50 ([37.40-37.68] sd = 3.48), i.e. a good level of knowledge. Students with a Nursing Auxiliary Diploma (NAD) scored significantly better than no NAD students, both before (p˂0.001) and after (p˂0.001) IPC training. The teaching techniques used were varied and combined, but only practice audits significantly improved students' knowledge after training (p = 0.050).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nursing students' knowledge of IPC before training is heterogeneous and moderate. After training, knowledge had improved little but significantly. Only auditing was effective to improve students' level of knowledge of IPC. Audits should be included in the IPC training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"850"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03316-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In order to prevent healthcare-associated infections, infection prevention and control (IPC) is taught to nursing students in France as soon as they enter the nursing training institutes. The primary objective of this study was to assess the knowledge of standard precautions and hand hygiene of French nursing students before and after training. Secondary objectives were to measure factors predicting success on knowledge tests, and to investigate the effectiveness of the different teaching techniques used.

Materials and methods: A quantitative study using online self-administered questionnaires was performed between September 1, 2022 and March 7, 2023 in French nursing training institutes. Three self-administered questionnaires were administered: the first to IPC trainers on their teaching methods, and the next two to nursing students on their knowledge and socio-demographic characteristics, with one questionnaire before and one after IPC training.

Results: Fifty-nine nursing training institutes took part in the study. Before and after IPC training, 3,739 and 2,378 nursing students participated, respectively. At the start of training, the mean score on the knowledge test was 35.67 out of 50 ([35.53-35.77] sd = 3.76), i.e. a moderate level of knowledge. After IPC training, the mean score on the knowledge test was 37.55 out of 50 ([37.40-37.68] sd = 3.48), i.e. a good level of knowledge. Students with a Nursing Auxiliary Diploma (NAD) scored significantly better than no NAD students, both before (p˂0.001) and after (p˂0.001) IPC training. The teaching techniques used were varied and combined, but only practice audits significantly improved students' knowledge after training (p = 0.050).

Discussion: Nursing students' knowledge of IPC before training is heterogeneous and moderate. After training, knowledge had improved little but significantly. Only auditing was effective to improve students' level of knowledge of IPC. Audits should be included in the IPC training program.

护生感染预防与控制知识及教学效果。
简介:为了预防与医疗保健相关的感染,法国的护理专业学生一进入护理培训机构就被教授感染预防和控制(IPC)。本研究的主要目的是评估法国护生培训前后的标准预防措施和手卫生知识。次要目标是测量预测知识测试成功的因素,并调查所使用的不同教学方法的有效性。材料与方法:于2022年9月1日至2023年3月7日在法国护理培训机构采用在线自填问卷进行定量研究。进行了三份自填问卷:第一份问卷是针对IPC培训人员的教学方法,第二份问卷是针对护理学生的知识和社会人口特征,其中一份问卷是在IPC培训之前,一份是在培训之后。结果:59所护理培训机构参与了本研究。IPC培训前后分别有3739名和2378名护理学生参加。在训练开始时,知识测试的平均得分为35.67分([35.53-35.77]sd = 3.76),即知识水平中等。IPC培训后,知识测试的平均得分为37.55分([37.40-37.68]sd = 3.48),即良好的知识水平。获得护理辅助文凭(NAD)的学生在IPC培训前(p小于0.001)和培训后(p小于0.001)的得分均明显优于未获得NAD的学生。教学方法多种多样,组合使用,但只有实习审计能显著提高学生培训后的知识水平(p = 0.050)。讨论:护生培训前对IPC知识的了解存在异质性和中等程度。经过培训后,知识的提高幅度不大,但效果显著。只有审计才能有效提高学生的IPC知识水平。审核应包括在IPC培训计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信