{"title":"Investigating the correlation between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength in polyurethane foam concrete.","authors":"R Roobankumar, M SenthilPandian","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-07666-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using waste polyurethane foam as a partial replacement for natural coarse aggregates in concrete provides an eco-friendly solution by reducing waste and conserving natural resources. However, the strength behavior of polyurethane foam concrete differs from conventional concrete. To ensure effective design and quality control in the field, the viability of non-destructive testing methods for finding out the in situ mechanical properties of polyurethane foam concrete must be evaluated. This study establishes a correlation between compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test to predict the compressive strength of polyurethane foam concrete using UPV test results. An experimental study was conducted on concrete specimens with varying percentages of polyurethane foam replacing natural coarse aggregate, ranging from 10 to 60% in 10% increments. The control concrete mix was 100% natural coarse aggregate without polyurethane foam. The properties of the specimens were evaluated after curing for 7, 14, and 28 days. It also examines polyurethane foam concrete workability, density, and microstructural properties. The findings show that the UPV and compressive strength of polyurethane foam concrete were lower than those of the control mix concrete for all replacement levels and curing ages. The empirical relationships between compressive strength and UPV were found to be exponential, with high correlation values ranging from 0.9012 to 0.9998. The predicted values and the experimentally measured results were compared in order to confirm the accuracy of the empirical equations for compressive strength prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07666-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Using waste polyurethane foam as a partial replacement for natural coarse aggregates in concrete provides an eco-friendly solution by reducing waste and conserving natural resources. However, the strength behavior of polyurethane foam concrete differs from conventional concrete. To ensure effective design and quality control in the field, the viability of non-destructive testing methods for finding out the in situ mechanical properties of polyurethane foam concrete must be evaluated. This study establishes a correlation between compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test to predict the compressive strength of polyurethane foam concrete using UPV test results. An experimental study was conducted on concrete specimens with varying percentages of polyurethane foam replacing natural coarse aggregate, ranging from 10 to 60% in 10% increments. The control concrete mix was 100% natural coarse aggregate without polyurethane foam. The properties of the specimens were evaluated after curing for 7, 14, and 28 days. It also examines polyurethane foam concrete workability, density, and microstructural properties. The findings show that the UPV and compressive strength of polyurethane foam concrete were lower than those of the control mix concrete for all replacement levels and curing ages. The empirical relationships between compressive strength and UPV were found to be exponential, with high correlation values ranging from 0.9012 to 0.9998. The predicted values and the experimentally measured results were compared in order to confirm the accuracy of the empirical equations for compressive strength prediction.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.