Amit Bhomia, Srikanta Routroy, Anupam Singhal, Rahul Samyal
{"title":"Analyzing the effects of pickling sludge and fly ash valorized cement sand bricks.","authors":"Amit Bhomia, Srikanta Routroy, Anupam Singhal, Rahul Samyal","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-08359-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The disposal of Stainless-Steel Pickling Sludge (SSPS) in landfills remains an important issue. Utilizing SSPS as construction material mitigates the negative environmental effects associated with its disposal, providing a sustainable solution. This study investigates co-utilization of SSPS and fly ash as partial substitution of river sand on cement sand bricks properties. Nine cement sand bricks compositions, including control mix, were prepared with varying composition of SSPS, fly ash and river sand. Four compositions were developed with SSPS varied from 2.5 to 10% with fixed fly ash content of 50%. Four additional compositions with varying fly ash content from 40 to 47.5% and varying SSPS 2.5-10% content as partial substitution of river sand were prepared. The developed bricks demonstrated that gradual increment of SSPS (2.5-10%) and reduction of fly ash (47.5-40%) proved incremental to the compressive strength up to 28 MPa. In addition, the morphological analysis using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) were conducted for the compositions. The microstructure analysis showed that with inclusion of fly ash, Mix 2 (M2) compositions revealed a dense microstructure validating the sorptivity results as compared to Mix 1 (M1) compositions. Finally, the cost estimation of the waste valorized bricks as compared to the control bricks was observed to be significantly low. The experiment outcomes concluded adoption of SSPS-fly ash waste valorized bricks as a greener alternative to disposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23884"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08359-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The disposal of Stainless-Steel Pickling Sludge (SSPS) in landfills remains an important issue. Utilizing SSPS as construction material mitigates the negative environmental effects associated with its disposal, providing a sustainable solution. This study investigates co-utilization of SSPS and fly ash as partial substitution of river sand on cement sand bricks properties. Nine cement sand bricks compositions, including control mix, were prepared with varying composition of SSPS, fly ash and river sand. Four compositions were developed with SSPS varied from 2.5 to 10% with fixed fly ash content of 50%. Four additional compositions with varying fly ash content from 40 to 47.5% and varying SSPS 2.5-10% content as partial substitution of river sand were prepared. The developed bricks demonstrated that gradual increment of SSPS (2.5-10%) and reduction of fly ash (47.5-40%) proved incremental to the compressive strength up to 28 MPa. In addition, the morphological analysis using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) were conducted for the compositions. The microstructure analysis showed that with inclusion of fly ash, Mix 2 (M2) compositions revealed a dense microstructure validating the sorptivity results as compared to Mix 1 (M1) compositions. Finally, the cost estimation of the waste valorized bricks as compared to the control bricks was observed to be significantly low. The experiment outcomes concluded adoption of SSPS-fly ash waste valorized bricks as a greener alternative to disposal.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.