Sarcopenia prevalence and relationship to frailty by measurement method in patients with adult spinal deformity.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-07-04 Print Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241551
Alexa Semonche, Justin K Scheer, Robert C Osorio, Anthony L Mikula, Thomas A Wozny, Winward Choy, Terry H Nguyen, Jaemin Kim, Aaron J Clark, Christopher P Ames
{"title":"Sarcopenia prevalence and relationship to frailty by measurement method in patients with adult spinal deformity.","authors":"Alexa Semonche, Justin K Scheer, Robert C Osorio, Anthony L Mikula, Thomas A Wozny, Winward Choy, Terry H Nguyen, Jaemin Kim, Aaron J Clark, Christopher P Ames","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is no consensus on how to diagnose sarcopenia in patients with spine disorders, limiting one's understanding of the relationship among sarcopenia, frailty, and surgical outcomes. The authors characterized the baseline prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) according to previously established methods. They then examined the intersection between sarcopenia and frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of preoperative patients with ASD at a single tertiary care center. Muscle function was assessed via hand grip strength, gait speed, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was used to determine the skeletal muscle index. Muscle imaging included both CT to determine the psoas muscle index and MRI to assess myosteatosis. Diagnostic thresholds for sarcopenia were taken from the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) and European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) consensus guidelines. Frailty was assessed using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and the adult spinal deformity frailty index (ASD-FI). Fisher's exact test, Spearman's rank correlation, and UpSet plot analyses were used to compare sarcopenia rates between measurement methods. Correlations between sarcopenia measures and frailty scores were also tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2023 and 2024, 101 patients with ASD were evaluated for sarcopenia. The mean age was 66.0 years, and 66 patients (65.3%) were female. The percentage of patients meeting SDOC or EWGSOP2 cutoff criteria for sarcopenia based on grip strength, age-normalized grip strength, grip strength/BMI, gait speed, TUG test, or skeletal muscle index ranged from 0% to 74.2%. The distribution of patients meeting each criterion differed significantly for male and female patients (p < 0.0001 for both). Despite this, all functional and imaging-based measures of sarcopenia, except for gait speed, were significantly correlated with each other. Interestingly, many sarcopenic patients were not frail (69.8% per the EFS, 47.5% per the ASD-FI), but nearly all frail patients were sarcopenic (100% per the EFS, 82.2% per the ASD-FI). Sarcopenia measures were not significantly correlated with frailty scores with a few exceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The baseline prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with ASD varied widely according to the measurement method (0%-74.2%). Despite this, nearly all measures of sarcopenia were significantly correlated with each other. However, many sarcopenic patients were not frail, and sarcopenia measures largely did not correlate with frailty scores. These results highlight the need for a consensus criterion for sarcopenia in patients with spine disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"324-333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is no consensus on how to diagnose sarcopenia in patients with spine disorders, limiting one's understanding of the relationship among sarcopenia, frailty, and surgical outcomes. The authors characterized the baseline prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) according to previously established methods. They then examined the intersection between sarcopenia and frailty.

Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of preoperative patients with ASD at a single tertiary care center. Muscle function was assessed via hand grip strength, gait speed, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was used to determine the skeletal muscle index. Muscle imaging included both CT to determine the psoas muscle index and MRI to assess myosteatosis. Diagnostic thresholds for sarcopenia were taken from the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) and European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) consensus guidelines. Frailty was assessed using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and the adult spinal deformity frailty index (ASD-FI). Fisher's exact test, Spearman's rank correlation, and UpSet plot analyses were used to compare sarcopenia rates between measurement methods. Correlations between sarcopenia measures and frailty scores were also tested.

Results: Between 2023 and 2024, 101 patients with ASD were evaluated for sarcopenia. The mean age was 66.0 years, and 66 patients (65.3%) were female. The percentage of patients meeting SDOC or EWGSOP2 cutoff criteria for sarcopenia based on grip strength, age-normalized grip strength, grip strength/BMI, gait speed, TUG test, or skeletal muscle index ranged from 0% to 74.2%. The distribution of patients meeting each criterion differed significantly for male and female patients (p < 0.0001 for both). Despite this, all functional and imaging-based measures of sarcopenia, except for gait speed, were significantly correlated with each other. Interestingly, many sarcopenic patients were not frail (69.8% per the EFS, 47.5% per the ASD-FI), but nearly all frail patients were sarcopenic (100% per the EFS, 82.2% per the ASD-FI). Sarcopenia measures were not significantly correlated with frailty scores with a few exceptions.

Conclusions: The baseline prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with ASD varied widely according to the measurement method (0%-74.2%). Despite this, nearly all measures of sarcopenia were significantly correlated with each other. However, many sarcopenic patients were not frail, and sarcopenia measures largely did not correlate with frailty scores. These results highlight the need for a consensus criterion for sarcopenia in patients with spine disorders.

成人脊柱畸形患者肌少症患病率及其与虚弱的关系。
目的:如何诊断脊柱疾病患者的肌肉减少症尚无共识,这限制了人们对肌肉减少症、虚弱和手术结果之间关系的理解。作者根据先前建立的方法描述了成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者肌肉减少症的基线患病率。然后他们研究了肌肉减少症和虚弱之间的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,在单一三级护理中心术前ASD患者。肌肉功能通过手握力、步态速度和定时起身(TUG)测试来评估。采用生物电阻抗分析法测定骨骼肌指数。肌肉成像包括确定腰肌指数的CT和评估肌骨化病的MRI。肌少症的诊断阈值来自肌少症定义和结局联盟(SDOC)和欧洲老年人肌少症工作组2 (EWGSOP2)共识指南。虚弱程度采用埃德蒙顿虚弱量表(EFS)和成人脊柱畸形虚弱指数(ASD-FI)进行评估。采用Fisher精确检验、Spearman秩相关和颠覆图分析来比较不同测量方法之间的肌肉减少率。肌肉减少症测量和虚弱评分之间的相关性也进行了测试。结果:在2023年至2024年期间,101例ASD患者被评估为肌肉减少症。平均年龄66.0岁,女性66例(65.3%)。根据握力、年龄标准化握力、握力/BMI、步态速度、TUG测试或骨骼肌指数,符合SDOC或EWGSOP2肌肉减少症截止标准的患者百分比从0%到74.2%不等。男性和女性患者符合各项标准的患者分布差异显著(p < 0.0001)。尽管如此,除了步态速度外,所有肌肉减少症的功能和基于成像的测量结果都显着相关。有趣的是,许多肌肉减少的患者并不虚弱(EFS为69.8%,ASD-FI为47.5%),但几乎所有虚弱的患者都是肌肉减少(EFS为100%,ASD-FI为82.2%)。骨骼肌减少症测量与虚弱评分没有显著相关,只有少数例外。结论:不同的测量方法,ASD患者肌少症的基线患病率差异很大(0%-74.2%)。尽管如此,几乎所有肌肉减少症的测量结果都是显著相关的。然而,许多肌肉减少症患者并不虚弱,肌肉减少症的测量在很大程度上与虚弱评分无关。这些结果强调了对脊柱疾病患者肌肉减少症的共识标准的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信