Initial community response to a novel spatial repellent for malaria prevention in Busia County, Kenya.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sheila Muya Ekodir, Lucy Baker, Julius I Odero, Jane Klein A Ikapesi, Moureen Ekisa, Albert Casella, April Monroe, Anna Passaniti, Eric Ochomo, Steven A Harvey
{"title":"Initial community response to a novel spatial repellent for malaria prevention in Busia County, Kenya.","authors":"Sheila Muya Ekodir, Lucy Baker, Julius I Odero, Jane Klein A Ikapesi, Moureen Ekisa, Albert Casella, April Monroe, Anna Passaniti, Eric Ochomo, Steven A Harvey","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05452-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria transmission in Africa significantly declined between 2005 and 2015 due to widespread distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). However, since 2015, transmission has increased due to insecticide resistance and biting at times when people are not using ITNs. Spatial repellents (SRs) may help address these challenges. A double-blinded cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) in Busia County, Kenya, reported that Mosquito Shield™, a transfluthrin-based SR, reduced malaria infections by 33.4% during interim analysis and 32.7% by the end of the study, among children aged 6 months to 10 years. Understanding community responses to SRs is critical for their successful deployment and long-term use. This paper reports the initial community response to MosquitoShield™ as part of the Advancing Evidence for the Global Implementation of Spatial Repellents (AEGIS) project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal qualitative data were collected from 30 households participating in the cRCT, using modified trials of improved practices (TIPs) to assess participants' perceptions of MosquitoShield's utility, efficacy, appearance, and user experience with monthly product replacement. This analysis focuses on initial responses recorded one week and two months post-installation. The data were analysed using thematic coding, with researchers blinded to trial arm assignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants reported a positive initial response to the SR, with a significant perceived reduction in mosquito density and activity. Some also reported concerns about the product's effectiveness over time and its comparison with existing mosquito control methods, particularly after first replacement. Participants highlighted their perception that the SR provided continuous protection in contrast with the situational protection offered by ITNs. Improvement suggestions included modified installation methods plus a longer-lasting product that protected more space.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MosquitoShield™ shows potential as a promising malaria prevention tool among communities in Busia County, Kenya. Incorporating user feedback and addressing concerns about product installation, duration, and coverage are crucial for successful implementation. Future research exploring community perceptions, cultural factors and behavioural responses related to long-term acceptability and the impact of SRs on malaria transmission will be crucial to ensure effective SR implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05452-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria transmission in Africa significantly declined between 2005 and 2015 due to widespread distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). However, since 2015, transmission has increased due to insecticide resistance and biting at times when people are not using ITNs. Spatial repellents (SRs) may help address these challenges. A double-blinded cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) in Busia County, Kenya, reported that Mosquito Shield™, a transfluthrin-based SR, reduced malaria infections by 33.4% during interim analysis and 32.7% by the end of the study, among children aged 6 months to 10 years. Understanding community responses to SRs is critical for their successful deployment and long-term use. This paper reports the initial community response to MosquitoShield™ as part of the Advancing Evidence for the Global Implementation of Spatial Repellents (AEGIS) project.

Methods: Longitudinal qualitative data were collected from 30 households participating in the cRCT, using modified trials of improved practices (TIPs) to assess participants' perceptions of MosquitoShield's utility, efficacy, appearance, and user experience with monthly product replacement. This analysis focuses on initial responses recorded one week and two months post-installation. The data were analysed using thematic coding, with researchers blinded to trial arm assignment.

Results: The participants reported a positive initial response to the SR, with a significant perceived reduction in mosquito density and activity. Some also reported concerns about the product's effectiveness over time and its comparison with existing mosquito control methods, particularly after first replacement. Participants highlighted their perception that the SR provided continuous protection in contrast with the situational protection offered by ITNs. Improvement suggestions included modified installation methods plus a longer-lasting product that protected more space.

Conclusion: MosquitoShield™ shows potential as a promising malaria prevention tool among communities in Busia County, Kenya. Incorporating user feedback and addressing concerns about product installation, duration, and coverage are crucial for successful implementation. Future research exploring community perceptions, cultural factors and behavioural responses related to long-term acceptability and the impact of SRs on malaria transmission will be crucial to ensure effective SR implementation.

肯尼亚布西亚县一种新型空间驱蚊剂预防疟疾的初步社区反应。
背景:2005年至2015年期间,由于杀虫剂处理过的蚊帐(ITNs)的广泛分发,非洲的疟疾传播显著下降。然而,自2015年以来,由于杀虫剂耐药性和在人们不使用经ITNs时叮咬,传播有所增加。空间驱避剂(SRs)可能有助于解决这些挑战。在肯尼亚Busia县进行的一项双盲集群随机对照试验(cRCT)报告称,在中期分析期间,蚊盾(Mosquito Shield™)(一种基于氟氯菊酯的SR)将6个月至10岁儿童的疟疾感染率降低了33.4%,在研究结束时降低了32.7%。了解社区对SRs的反应对于其成功部署和长期使用至关重要。本文报告了蚊盾作为全球实施空间驱蚊剂(AEGIS)项目的一部分的初步社区反应。方法:从参与cRCT的30个家庭中收集纵向定性数据,使用改进实践(TIPs)的改进试验来评估参与者对蚊盾的效用、功效、外观和每月更换产品的用户体验的看法。此分析侧重于安装后一周和两个月记录的初始响应。使用主题编码对数据进行分析,研究人员对试验组分配不知情。结果:参与者报告了对SR的积极初步反应,蚊子密度和活动显著减少。一些人还报告了对该产品长期有效性的担忧,以及与现有蚊虫控制方法的比较,特别是在第一次更换后。参与者强调,与itn提供的情境保护相比,SR提供了持续的保护。改进建议包括修改安装方法和更持久的产品,以保护更多的空间。结论:在肯尼亚Busia县的社区中,MosquitoShield显示出作为一种有前景的疟疾预防工具的潜力。结合用户反馈并解决有关产品安装、持续时间和覆盖范围的问题对于成功实现至关重要。未来的研究探索社区观念、文化因素和与长期可接受性相关的行为反应,以及特殊避孕措施对疟疾传播的影响,将是确保有效实施特殊避孕措施的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信