The Role of 473 Intestinal Microbiota and 91 Inflammatory Factors in Breast Cancer Risk: Insights From Mendel Randomization and its Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ruisen Zhu, Jin Qiu, Dehai Xian, Kaiwen Yang
{"title":"The Role of 473 Intestinal Microbiota and 91 Inflammatory Factors in Breast Cancer Risk: Insights From Mendel Randomization and its Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment.","authors":"Ruisen Zhu, Jin Qiu, Dehai Xian, Kaiwen Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between gut microbiota, inflammatory factors, and breast cancer risk has attracted significant attention in recent years. However, the causal relationships remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis was conducted to explore the causal relationships among 473 gut microbiota taxa, 91 inflammatory factors, and breast cancer. Mediation analysis was performed to assess the potential role of inflammatory factors in mediating the link between gut microbiota and breast cancer risk. At the same time, we used external datasets for validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR analysis revealed that gut microbiota taxa, such as Bacteroides eggerthii and Faecalicatena lactaris, were negatively associated with breast cancer risk, suggesting a protective effect. In contrast, other taxa, including Bacteroides stercoris and Bifidobacteriaceae, were positively associated with breast cancer risk. Several inflammatory factors, such as Caspase 8, CXCL10, FLT3L, IL-33, and LIFR, demonstrated negative associations with breast cancer risk, indicating potential protective roles. Mediation analysis identified FLT3L as a partial mediator in the relationship between Faecalicatena lactaris and breast cancer risk, as well as in the association between Mycoplasmoidaceae and breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study uncovers potential causal relationships between gut microbiota, inflammatory factors, and breast cancer development, offering new insights into biological targets and intervention strategies for breast cancer prevention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.06.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between gut microbiota, inflammatory factors, and breast cancer risk has attracted significant attention in recent years. However, the causal relationships remain unclear.

Methods: A bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis was conducted to explore the causal relationships among 473 gut microbiota taxa, 91 inflammatory factors, and breast cancer. Mediation analysis was performed to assess the potential role of inflammatory factors in mediating the link between gut microbiota and breast cancer risk. At the same time, we used external datasets for validation.

Results: MR analysis revealed that gut microbiota taxa, such as Bacteroides eggerthii and Faecalicatena lactaris, were negatively associated with breast cancer risk, suggesting a protective effect. In contrast, other taxa, including Bacteroides stercoris and Bifidobacteriaceae, were positively associated with breast cancer risk. Several inflammatory factors, such as Caspase 8, CXCL10, FLT3L, IL-33, and LIFR, demonstrated negative associations with breast cancer risk, indicating potential protective roles. Mediation analysis identified FLT3L as a partial mediator in the relationship between Faecalicatena lactaris and breast cancer risk, as well as in the association between Mycoplasmoidaceae and breast cancer.

Conclusions: This study uncovers potential causal relationships between gut microbiota, inflammatory factors, and breast cancer development, offering new insights into biological targets and intervention strategies for breast cancer prevention and treatment.

473种肠道微生物群和91种炎症因子在乳腺癌风险中的作用:来自孟德尔随机化的见解及其对诊断和治疗的意义
背景:近年来,肠道菌群、炎症因子和乳腺癌风险之间的关系引起了人们的极大关注。然而,因果关系尚不清楚。方法:采用双向双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,探讨473个肠道菌群、91个炎症因子与乳腺癌的因果关系。进行中介分析以评估炎症因子在介导肠道微生物群与乳腺癌风险之间的联系中的潜在作用。同时,我们使用外部数据集进行验证。结果:MR分析显示,肠道微生物类群,如拟乳杆菌(Bacteroides eggthii)和乳粪杆菌(Faecalicatena lactaris)与乳腺癌风险呈负相关,表明其具有保护作用。相比之下,其他类群,包括拟乳杆菌和双歧杆菌科,与乳腺癌风险呈正相关。一些炎症因子,如Caspase 8、CXCL10、FLT3L、IL-33和LIFR,显示出与乳腺癌风险负相关,表明潜在的保护作用。中介分析发现FLT3L在Faecalicatena lactaris与乳腺癌风险关系以及支原体科(Mycoplasmoidaceae)与乳腺癌的关系中起部分中介作用。结论:本研究揭示了肠道菌群、炎症因子与乳腺癌发展之间的潜在因果关系,为乳腺癌防治的生物学靶点和干预策略提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信