Endometriosis- "Either way a tragedy"? A qualitative social media analysis of endometriosis perceptions in Germany.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Till Neugebauer, Valeria Schellenberg, Alena Allak, Siegrun Pardon, Yüce Yilmaz-Aslan, Sven Schiermeier, Claudia Kiessling, Sven Schmiedl, Christoph Dockweiler, Patrick Brzoska
{"title":"Endometriosis- \"Either way a tragedy\"? A qualitative social media analysis of endometriosis perceptions in Germany.","authors":"Till Neugebauer, Valeria Schellenberg, Alena Allak, Siegrun Pardon, Yüce Yilmaz-Aslan, Sven Schiermeier, Claudia Kiessling, Sven Schmiedl, Christoph Dockweiler, Patrick Brzoska","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03865-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis is one of the most common diseases in women of reproductive age. Those affected suffer from a variety of symptoms that can have a challenging impact on different areas of life. Social media such as Instagram, TikTok and YouTube offer affected women a platform for sharing their condition and increasing its visibility. This study examines how endometriosis is communicated in the comment sections of such posts on social media in Germany in order to better understand the reality of the lives of those affected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>300 comments from Instagram, TikTok and YouTube were evaluated using summarizing qualitative content analysis. Data collection took place between October and November 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four categories were identified that shaped the exchange on social media. These included psychological and physical stress, criticism of healthcare, social impact and coping with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endometriosis remains stigmatised as a \"women's disease\", which makes recognition and prioritization in the healthcare system difficult. The reduction to menstruation-related complaints hinders the treatment of endometriosis-related symptoms, while pejorative communication by doctors increases the burden on those affected. While social media enables open dialogue and peer support, it also has potential to spread misinformation, influencing health decisions and fostering scepticism toward medical advice. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted public health response: destigmatising endometriosis through education, improving medical training, strengthening diagnostic pathways, and raising awareness in society.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03865-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is one of the most common diseases in women of reproductive age. Those affected suffer from a variety of symptoms that can have a challenging impact on different areas of life. Social media such as Instagram, TikTok and YouTube offer affected women a platform for sharing their condition and increasing its visibility. This study examines how endometriosis is communicated in the comment sections of such posts on social media in Germany in order to better understand the reality of the lives of those affected.

Methods: 300 comments from Instagram, TikTok and YouTube were evaluated using summarizing qualitative content analysis. Data collection took place between October and November 2024.

Results: Four categories were identified that shaped the exchange on social media. These included psychological and physical stress, criticism of healthcare, social impact and coping with endometriosis.

Conclusions: Endometriosis remains stigmatised as a "women's disease", which makes recognition and prioritization in the healthcare system difficult. The reduction to menstruation-related complaints hinders the treatment of endometriosis-related symptoms, while pejorative communication by doctors increases the burden on those affected. While social media enables open dialogue and peer support, it also has potential to spread misinformation, influencing health decisions and fostering scepticism toward medical advice. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted public health response: destigmatising endometriosis through education, improving medical training, strengthening diagnostic pathways, and raising awareness in society.

子宫内膜异位症- “无论如何都是悲剧”?德国对子宫内膜异位症认知的定性社交媒体分析。
背景:子宫内膜异位症是育龄妇女最常见的疾病之一。受影响的人患有各种各样的症状,这些症状会对生活的不同领域产生挑战性的影响。Instagram、TikTok和YouTube等社交媒体为受影响的女性提供了一个分享自己病情并提高其知名度的平台。这项研究调查了子宫内膜异位症是如何在德国社交媒体上的评论区传播的,以便更好地了解受影响者的现实生活。方法:采用总结定性内容分析法,对来自Instagram、TikTok和YouTube的300条评论进行评价。数据收集于2024年10月至11月进行。结果:确定了影响社交媒体交流的四个类别。其中包括心理和生理压力、对医疗保健的批评、社会影响和应对子宫内膜异位症。结论:子宫内膜异位症仍然被认为是一种“女性疾病”,这使得医疗保健系统难以识别和优先考虑。月经相关投诉的减少阻碍了子宫内膜异位症相关症状的治疗,而医生的贬损性沟通增加了受影响者的负担。虽然社交媒体能够实现公开对话和同伴支持,但它也有可能传播错误信息,影响健康决策,并助长对医疗建议的怀疑。应对这些挑战需要多方面的公共卫生对策:通过教育消除子宫内膜异位症的污名,改善医疗培训,加强诊断途径,提高社会认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信