Multisite survey of pharmacy student perspectives of the layered learning model and ability to participate in core entrustable professional activities during advanced pharmacy practice experiences

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Tori A. Ohman , Lisa M. Richter , Mark Dewey , Kayla Vigen
{"title":"Multisite survey of pharmacy student perspectives of the layered learning model and ability to participate in core entrustable professional activities during advanced pharmacy practice experiences","authors":"Tori A. Ohman ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Richter ,&nbsp;Mark Dewey ,&nbsp;Kayla Vigen","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The layered learning practice model (LLPM) teaching strategy helps maximize the pharmacy team and accommodate more learners. This study aims to measure students' perspectives of the LLPM and assess if students perceived they were more able to participate in the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) 2016 Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) during rotations utilizing the LLPM. A secondary objective was to assess student's perceived individual and collaboration skills before and after LLPM and non-LLPM rotations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fourth-year pharmacy students at two Midwest pharmacy schools were retrospectively surveyed on their most recent advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE). Students were asked to rate their self-assessed ability to participate in the AACP EPAs using a standard Likert scale. Students also completed a modified Student Stereotypes Rating Questionnaire (SSRQ) to assess individual and collaborative skill levels and noted strengths and weaknesses of the rotation structure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 114 students that completed the survey, 66 reported having layered learning rotations. The mean rating for each subscale and skill levels was higher in students completing a layered learning rotation. The statistical analysis showed that completing a layered learning rotation (versus a non-layered learning rotation) had a small effect on students' ability to participate in three of the five subscales, a small to medium effect on one subscale, a large effect on the patient care provider subscale, and a small effect on students' SSRQ scores. Benefits of the LLPM included multiple individuals to ask questions of and the variety of teaching styles, weaknesses included unclear reporting structures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rotations utilizing the LLPM had a limited impact on students' self-assessed ability to participate in Core EPAs. Students' individual and collaborative skills increased regardless of rotation practice model type. Future studies should add an objective measure of student ability to perform EPAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 10","pages":"Article 102436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725001571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The layered learning practice model (LLPM) teaching strategy helps maximize the pharmacy team and accommodate more learners. This study aims to measure students' perspectives of the LLPM and assess if students perceived they were more able to participate in the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) 2016 Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) during rotations utilizing the LLPM. A secondary objective was to assess student's perceived individual and collaboration skills before and after LLPM and non-LLPM rotations.

Methods

Fourth-year pharmacy students at two Midwest pharmacy schools were retrospectively surveyed on their most recent advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE). Students were asked to rate their self-assessed ability to participate in the AACP EPAs using a standard Likert scale. Students also completed a modified Student Stereotypes Rating Questionnaire (SSRQ) to assess individual and collaborative skill levels and noted strengths and weaknesses of the rotation structure.

Results

Of the 114 students that completed the survey, 66 reported having layered learning rotations. The mean rating for each subscale and skill levels was higher in students completing a layered learning rotation. The statistical analysis showed that completing a layered learning rotation (versus a non-layered learning rotation) had a small effect on students' ability to participate in three of the five subscales, a small to medium effect on one subscale, a large effect on the patient care provider subscale, and a small effect on students' SSRQ scores. Benefits of the LLPM included multiple individuals to ask questions of and the variety of teaching styles, weaknesses included unclear reporting structures.

Conclusions

Rotations utilizing the LLPM had a limited impact on students' self-assessed ability to participate in Core EPAs. Students' individual and collaborative skills increased regardless of rotation practice model type. Future studies should add an objective measure of student ability to perform EPAs.
多地点调查药学学生对分层学习模式和参与核心专业活动的能力在高级药学实践经历的看法
分层学习实践模式(LLPM)教学策略有助于药房团队的最大化和容纳更多的学习者。本研究旨在衡量学生对LLPM的看法,并评估学生是否认为他们在使用LLPM的轮岗期间更能参与美国药学院协会(AACP) 2016年核心可信赖专业活动(EPAs)。第二个目标是评估学生在LLPM和非LLPM轮换前后的个人和协作技能。方法回顾性调查美国中西部两所药学院四年级药学专业学生最近的高级药学实践经历(APPE)。学生们被要求使用标准李克特量表对他们参与AACP epa的自我评估能力进行评分。学生们还完成了一份修改后的学生刻板印象评定问卷(SSRQ),以评估个人和合作技能水平,并注意到轮转结构的优缺点。在完成调查的114名学生中,有66名学生报告说他们有分层学习轮转。完成分层学习轮换的学生在每个子量表和技能水平上的平均评分更高。统计分析表明,完成分层学习轮转(相对于非分层学习轮转)对学生参与五个子量表中的三个子量表的能力有小影响,对一个子量表有中小影响,对病人护理提供者子量表有大影响,对学生的SSRQ分数有小影响。LLPM的好处包括多人提问和各种教学风格,缺点包括不明确的报告结构。结论:使用LLPM的轮岗对学生参与核心EPAs的自我评估能力影响有限。无论轮转实习模式如何,学生的个人和协作能力都有所提高。未来的研究应该增加一个客观的衡量学生执行环境评估的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信