Mei-Kuen Tang , Steven G. Carmella , Yingchun Zhao , Laura Maertens , Laura G. Pimentel , Dorothy K. Hatsukami , Stephen S. Hecht
{"title":"Quantitative analysis of propylene glycol in saliva of e-cigarette users by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry","authors":"Mei-Kuen Tang , Steven G. Carmella , Yingchun Zhao , Laura Maertens , Laura G. Pimentel , Dorothy K. Hatsukami , Stephen S. Hecht","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A method was developed for the quantitation of propylene glycol in human saliva as a potentially useful biomarker for e-cigarette use. Saliva was collected from e-cigarette users, cigarette smokers, and non-users of any tobacco or nicotine product with approval from the University of Minnesota Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board. Two separate protocols, termed programmed and non-programmed, were used. In the programmed protocol, e-cigarette users (<em>n</em> = 20) and cigarette smokers (<em>n</em> = 20) brushed their teeth, waited 15 min, then used their product every 30 s for 5 min and collected a 2 mL saliva sample immediately after the last puff. In the non-programmed protocol, cigarette smokers (<em>n</em> = 30) and e-cigarette users (<em>n</em> = 21) came to the clinic and directly provided a saliva sample for analysis. Non-users (<em>n</em> = 29) of any nicotine or tobacco product served as controls. Propylene glycol in saliva was quantified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry as its heptafluorobutyrate ester, using propylene glycol-<em>d</em><sub><em>8</em></sub> as the internal standard. Accuracy and precision of the assay were established. Levels of salivary propylene glycol (mean ± S.D.) were 269 ± 319 and 8.04 ± 8.22 μg/mL saliva in e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers, respectively, in the programmed protocol, while the corresponding levels in the non-programmed protocol were 4.94 ± 8.68 and 1.91 ± 1.99 μg/mL. These amounts were all significantly greater than those found in non-users of any tobacco or nicotine product (0.39 ± 0.32 μg/mL). This straightforward validated assay is expected to be useful in future clinical studies of e-cigarette use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":"1264 ","pages":"Article 124719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023225002739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A method was developed for the quantitation of propylene glycol in human saliva as a potentially useful biomarker for e-cigarette use. Saliva was collected from e-cigarette users, cigarette smokers, and non-users of any tobacco or nicotine product with approval from the University of Minnesota Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board. Two separate protocols, termed programmed and non-programmed, were used. In the programmed protocol, e-cigarette users (n = 20) and cigarette smokers (n = 20) brushed their teeth, waited 15 min, then used their product every 30 s for 5 min and collected a 2 mL saliva sample immediately after the last puff. In the non-programmed protocol, cigarette smokers (n = 30) and e-cigarette users (n = 21) came to the clinic and directly provided a saliva sample for analysis. Non-users (n = 29) of any nicotine or tobacco product served as controls. Propylene glycol in saliva was quantified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry as its heptafluorobutyrate ester, using propylene glycol-d8 as the internal standard. Accuracy and precision of the assay were established. Levels of salivary propylene glycol (mean ± S.D.) were 269 ± 319 and 8.04 ± 8.22 μg/mL saliva in e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers, respectively, in the programmed protocol, while the corresponding levels in the non-programmed protocol were 4.94 ± 8.68 and 1.91 ± 1.99 μg/mL. These amounts were all significantly greater than those found in non-users of any tobacco or nicotine product (0.39 ± 0.32 μg/mL). This straightforward validated assay is expected to be useful in future clinical studies of e-cigarette use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis.
Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches.
Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.