Aghata E.M. da Silva , Arturo M. Franco , Abigail Barney , Felipe Henrique de Moura , Glenn C. Duff , Leilson R. Bezerra , Nelcino F. de Paula , Mozart A. Fonseca
{"title":"The plane of nutrition and dietary protein level during backgrounding and finishing phases affect nitrogen and water metabolism in beef cattle","authors":"Aghata E.M. da Silva , Arturo M. Franco , Abigail Barney , Felipe Henrique de Moura , Glenn C. Duff , Leilson R. Bezerra , Nelcino F. de Paula , Mozart A. Fonseca","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to examine how varying planes of nutrition during the two phases: backgrounding (<strong>BP</strong>) and finishing (<strong>FP</strong>) impact nitrogen (N) metabolism and, consequently, the water requirements of beef cattle. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298.01 ± 10.17 kg) were randomly distributed in a completely randomized design following a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (two phases and two nutritional planes). The phases being <strong>BP</strong> (85 d) and <strong>FP</strong> (105 d); and plane of nutrition being moderate (<strong>MP;</strong> crude protein-CP: 9.10 %) or high (<strong>HP</strong>; CP: 12.62 %) for BP and forage (high-quality alfalfa hay; CP: 21.3 %) or grain-finished (80 % whole corn and 20 % alfalfa hay; CP: 10.8 %)) for FP. There was a significant interaction between <strong>BP</strong> and <strong>FP</strong> (<em>P</em> < 0.1) for dry matter intake (DMI), N-ingested (g/d), fecal (g/d), N-urinary (% of N-excreted), and total N-excreted (g/d). There was no interaction observed for microbial N and microbial protein synthesis (<em>P</em> > 0.1). Animals fed <strong>HP</strong> diets excreted less N-urinary and N-fecal and therefore retained more N (<em>P</em> < 0.01), increasing N-efficiency (<em>P</em> < 0.01) compared to <strong>MP</strong> animals. No differences were observed for water intake or microbial-N (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Grain-fed cattle consumed less N and water compared to forage-fed cattle, as well as the lowest excretion of N-fecal and urinary-N, and higher rate of N-retained and higher efficiency on utilizing the N-intake (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Animals fed <strong>HP</strong> lowest DMI N excretion, fecal output, and N-fecal (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Cattle receiving <strong>HP</strong> during backgrounding will reduce their N-excretion without modifying the required amount of water while producing the same amount of microbial-N due to more efficient N-recycling. This N and water use efficiency pattern carried over when these animals transitioned to grain-fed finishing systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 116436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to examine how varying planes of nutrition during the two phases: backgrounding (BP) and finishing (FP) impact nitrogen (N) metabolism and, consequently, the water requirements of beef cattle. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298.01 ± 10.17 kg) were randomly distributed in a completely randomized design following a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (two phases and two nutritional planes). The phases being BP (85 d) and FP (105 d); and plane of nutrition being moderate (MP; crude protein-CP: 9.10 %) or high (HP; CP: 12.62 %) for BP and forage (high-quality alfalfa hay; CP: 21.3 %) or grain-finished (80 % whole corn and 20 % alfalfa hay; CP: 10.8 %)) for FP. There was a significant interaction between BP and FP (P < 0.1) for dry matter intake (DMI), N-ingested (g/d), fecal (g/d), N-urinary (% of N-excreted), and total N-excreted (g/d). There was no interaction observed for microbial N and microbial protein synthesis (P > 0.1). Animals fed HP diets excreted less N-urinary and N-fecal and therefore retained more N (P < 0.01), increasing N-efficiency (P < 0.01) compared to MP animals. No differences were observed for water intake or microbial-N (P > 0.05). Grain-fed cattle consumed less N and water compared to forage-fed cattle, as well as the lowest excretion of N-fecal and urinary-N, and higher rate of N-retained and higher efficiency on utilizing the N-intake (P < 0.05). Animals fed HP lowest DMI N excretion, fecal output, and N-fecal (P < 0.05). Cattle receiving HP during backgrounding will reduce their N-excretion without modifying the required amount of water while producing the same amount of microbial-N due to more efficient N-recycling. This N and water use efficiency pattern carried over when these animals transitioned to grain-fed finishing systems.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.