Sustainable insulation materials for E-grocery shipments: A multi-criteria evaluation

IF 8.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Cecilia Nicoletti , Sarah Pfoser , Manuela Brandner , Bernhard Blank-Landeshammer , Marion Dornmayr , Julian Weghuber
{"title":"Sustainable insulation materials for E-grocery shipments: A multi-criteria evaluation","authors":"Cecilia Nicoletti ,&nbsp;Sarah Pfoser ,&nbsp;Manuela Brandner ,&nbsp;Bernhard Blank-Landeshammer ,&nbsp;Marion Dornmayr ,&nbsp;Julian Weghuber","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the continuous growth of e-groceries, sustainable packaging solutions are needed to reduce the environmental impact of e-grocery shipments. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the operational and economic performance of six different insulation materials. A multi-criteria analysis was conducted to evaluate different aspects of the packaging solutions. Physical properties such as volume utilization and weight were examined, as well as the price attractiveness. Two online surveys with 1,314 respondents in total were performed to evaluate consumer acceptance. Finally, lab tests assessed the thermal insulation performance and the cushioning effect of the insulation materials tested. No single insulation material or solution stands out in all aspects of the multi-criteria analysis. Recycled paper flakes and recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) perform best overall. rPET is lightweight, compact, cost-effective, and offers excellent insulation and cushioning properties. Yet, consumer acceptance is very low. Conversely, recycled paper is well-received by consumers, economically viable, and performs similarly well in insulation and cushioning, but is heavier and less space-efficient. This is one of the first studies comparing several different alternative insulation materials (i.e., recycled paper flakes, rPET, straw, hemp, sheep’s wool, recycled cotton) for transport packaging at the same time in a multidisciplinary manner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100690"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525001522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the continuous growth of e-groceries, sustainable packaging solutions are needed to reduce the environmental impact of e-grocery shipments. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the operational and economic performance of six different insulation materials. A multi-criteria analysis was conducted to evaluate different aspects of the packaging solutions. Physical properties such as volume utilization and weight were examined, as well as the price attractiveness. Two online surveys with 1,314 respondents in total were performed to evaluate consumer acceptance. Finally, lab tests assessed the thermal insulation performance and the cushioning effect of the insulation materials tested. No single insulation material or solution stands out in all aspects of the multi-criteria analysis. Recycled paper flakes and recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) perform best overall. rPET is lightweight, compact, cost-effective, and offers excellent insulation and cushioning properties. Yet, consumer acceptance is very low. Conversely, recycled paper is well-received by consumers, economically viable, and performs similarly well in insulation and cushioning, but is heavier and less space-efficient. This is one of the first studies comparing several different alternative insulation materials (i.e., recycled paper flakes, rPET, straw, hemp, sheep’s wool, recycled cotton) for transport packaging at the same time in a multidisciplinary manner.
电子杂货运输的可持续绝缘材料:多标准评估
由于电子杂货的持续增长,需要可持续的包装解决方案来减少电子杂货运输对环境的影响。本文的目的是评估六种不同的绝缘材料的运行和经济性能。进行了多标准分析,以评估包装解决方案的不同方面。考察了材料的体积利用率和重量等物理性能,以及价格吸引力。两项共有1314名受访者的在线调查对消费者的接受程度进行了评估。最后,通过室内试验对所测保温材料的保温性能和缓冲效果进行了评价。没有单一的绝缘材料或解决方案在多标准分析的各个方面都脱颖而出。再生纸片和再生聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(rPET)整体表现最好。rPET重量轻,结构紧凑,具有成本效益,并提供出色的绝缘和缓冲性能。然而,消费者的接受度非常低。相反,再生纸受到消费者的欢迎,经济上可行,并且在绝缘和缓冲方面表现同样良好,但重量更重,空间效率更低。这是第一个研究比较几种不同的替代绝缘材料(即,再生纸薄片,rPET,稻草,大麻,羊毛,再生棉)在同一时间以多学科的方式进行运输包装。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Foods is a specialized journal that is dedicated to tackling the challenges posed by climate change and the need for sustainability in the realm of food production. The journal recognizes the imperative to transform current food manufacturing and consumption practices to meet the dietary needs of a burgeoning global population while simultaneously curbing environmental degradation. The mission of Future Foods is to disseminate research that aligns with the goal of fostering the development of innovative technologies and alternative food sources to establish more sustainable food systems. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the advancement of sustainable food practices. Abstracting and indexing: Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) SNIP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信