Scanning mode effects on relative electron density and effective atomic number accuracy in dual-layer spectral CT: A phantom study.

Xinliang Lu, Yunfu Liu, Yongxian Zhang, Dandan Liu, Li Leng, Senlin Guo, Wentao Ma, Xiaomei Lu, Yantao Niu
{"title":"Scanning mode effects on relative electron density and effective atomic number accuracy in dual-layer spectral CT: A phantom study.","authors":"Xinliang Lu, Yunfu Liu, Yongxian Zhang, Dandan Liu, Li Leng, Senlin Guo, Wentao Ma, Xiaomei Lu, Yantao Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the accuracy of relative electron density (RED) and effective atomic number (EAN) measurements using dual-layer spectral CT (DLSCT) in axial and helical scanning modes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CIRS 062M phantom was scanned with three collimation widths (16 × 0.625 mm, 32 × 0.625 mm, 64 × 0.625 mm) in axial mode and combined with two pitches (0.61 and 0.98) in helical mode. The RED and EAN were quantified using the IntelliSpace Portal, with absolute and relative errors calculated for each insert. Error metrics, including mean absolute error (MAE) and mean relative error (MRE), were subsequently derived over all the inserts. High accuracy was defined as the absolute error < 0.2. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In axial mode, the MAE for RED was within 0.01 and the MRE was within 2%; for EAN, the MAE was within 0.25 and the MRE was within 3%. In helical mode, the MAE for RED was within 0.02 and the MRE was within 2.5%; for EAN, the MAE was within 0.5 and the MRE was within 6%. Lung insert showed the highest deviation, while for all other inserts, the MAE was within 0.2 and the MRE was within 2% for EAN across both scanning modes. Smaller collimation widths in axial scanning showed lower relative errors for RED and EAN compared to helical scanning for bone and most of the soft inserts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DLSCT accurately estimates RED and EAN in both scanning modes, suitable for clinical quantitative tissue analysis, with the exception of lung tissue. Smaller collimation widths in axial scanning are recommended for enhanced measurement accuracy and stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.06.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of relative electron density (RED) and effective atomic number (EAN) measurements using dual-layer spectral CT (DLSCT) in axial and helical scanning modes.

Methods: The CIRS 062M phantom was scanned with three collimation widths (16 × 0.625 mm, 32 × 0.625 mm, 64 × 0.625 mm) in axial mode and combined with two pitches (0.61 and 0.98) in helical mode. The RED and EAN were quantified using the IntelliSpace Portal, with absolute and relative errors calculated for each insert. Error metrics, including mean absolute error (MAE) and mean relative error (MRE), were subsequently derived over all the inserts. High accuracy was defined as the absolute error < 0.2. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA.

Results: In axial mode, the MAE for RED was within 0.01 and the MRE was within 2%; for EAN, the MAE was within 0.25 and the MRE was within 3%. In helical mode, the MAE for RED was within 0.02 and the MRE was within 2.5%; for EAN, the MAE was within 0.5 and the MRE was within 6%. Lung insert showed the highest deviation, while for all other inserts, the MAE was within 0.2 and the MRE was within 2% for EAN across both scanning modes. Smaller collimation widths in axial scanning showed lower relative errors for RED and EAN compared to helical scanning for bone and most of the soft inserts.

Conclusions: DLSCT accurately estimates RED and EAN in both scanning modes, suitable for clinical quantitative tissue analysis, with the exception of lung tissue. Smaller collimation widths in axial scanning are recommended for enhanced measurement accuracy and stability.

扫描模式对双层光谱CT相对电子密度和有效原子序数精度的影响。
目的:评价双层光谱CT (DLSCT)在轴向和螺旋扫描模式下相对电子密度(RED)和有效原子序数(EAN)测量的准确性。方法:以3种准直宽度(16 × 0.625 mm、32 × 0.625 mm、64 × 0.625 mm)轴向扫描CIRS 062M幻影,以2个螺距(0.61和0.98)螺旋扫描CIRS 062M幻影。使用IntelliSpace Portal对RED和EAN进行量化,并计算每次插入的绝对和相对误差。误差指标,包括平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均相对误差(MRE),随后得到所有插入的误差。高准确度定义为绝对误差< 0.2。统计学分析采用单因素方差分析。结果:轴向模式下,RED的MAE在0.01以内,MRE在2%以内;EAN的MAE在0.25以内,MRE在3%以内。螺旋模式下,RED的MAE在0.02以内,MRE在2.5%以内;EAN的MAE在0.5以内,MRE在6%以内。在两种扫描模式下,肺插入物的偏差最大,而对于所有其他插入物,MAE在0.2以内,MRE在2%以内。轴向扫描中较小的准直宽度显示,与骨和大多数软插入物的螺旋扫描相比,RED和EAN的相对误差较低。结论:DLSCT在两种扫描模式下均能准确估计RED和EAN,适用于临床定量组织分析,肺组织除外。较小的准直宽度轴向扫描建议提高测量精度和稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信