Turkish Version of the Cardiac Distress Inventory and Cardiac Distress Inventory Short Form: A Validity and Reliability Study.

Füsun Afşar, Ece Alagöz, Asibe Özkan, Özlem Köksal, Mehmet Şeker, Ahmet İlker Tekeşin, Habip Yılmaz, Alun C Jackson, Michael Le Grande
{"title":"Turkish Version of the Cardiac Distress Inventory and Cardiac Distress Inventory Short Form: A Validity and Reliability Study.","authors":"Füsun Afşar, Ece Alagöz, Asibe Özkan, Özlem Köksal, Mehmet Şeker, Ahmet İlker Tekeşin, Habip Yılmaz, Alun C Jackson, Michael Le Grande","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2025.94460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Increased negative moods such as anxiety, depression and fear of recurrence of cardiac events after a cardiac event, make it difficult to comply with lifestyle recommendations and drug therapy. Conducting screenings for cardiac distress and ensuring appropriate referrals are made constitute a crucial aspect of maintaining a healthy lifestyle post-illness. The Cardiac Distress Inventory has made it possible to assess cardiac patients psychologically and emotionally. The objective of this study was to provide a validity and reliability assessment of the original form Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) and short form (CDI-SF), in Turkish.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The inventory was administered face to face to a total of 417 participants (336 CDI/81 CDI-SF) who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and volunteered to participate in the study. Validity data was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Rasch, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), reliability by McDonald's Omega (ω), Pearson correlation coefficient and discriminability by Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two CDI were a high level of reliability. The factor structure and factor loadings of the CDI were not compatible with the original. The goodness of fit estimated by validity (CFA-EFA) was also not confirmed. The values of RMSEA, χ2/df and CFI indices suggest that it is not suitable for Türkiye. However, in the cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability study of the CDI-SF, it was concluded that the construct validity and internal consistency were high and could be used as a unidimensional scale. The inventory will be made freely available to clinicians and researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDI-SF provides a specific, pragmatic and reliable measurement of cardiac distress, adapted to common heart diseases. It serves as an effective screening tool in cardiac clinical management by demonstrating strong psychometric properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":"53 5","pages":"342-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2025.94460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Increased negative moods such as anxiety, depression and fear of recurrence of cardiac events after a cardiac event, make it difficult to comply with lifestyle recommendations and drug therapy. Conducting screenings for cardiac distress and ensuring appropriate referrals are made constitute a crucial aspect of maintaining a healthy lifestyle post-illness. The Cardiac Distress Inventory has made it possible to assess cardiac patients psychologically and emotionally. The objective of this study was to provide a validity and reliability assessment of the original form Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) and short form (CDI-SF), in Turkish.

Method: The inventory was administered face to face to a total of 417 participants (336 CDI/81 CDI-SF) who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and volunteered to participate in the study. Validity data was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Rasch, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), reliability by McDonald's Omega (ω), Pearson correlation coefficient and discriminability by Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: The two CDI were a high level of reliability. The factor structure and factor loadings of the CDI were not compatible with the original. The goodness of fit estimated by validity (CFA-EFA) was also not confirmed. The values of RMSEA, χ2/df and CFI indices suggest that it is not suitable for Türkiye. However, in the cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability study of the CDI-SF, it was concluded that the construct validity and internal consistency were high and could be used as a unidimensional scale. The inventory will be made freely available to clinicians and researchers.

Conclusion: CDI-SF provides a specific, pragmatic and reliable measurement of cardiac distress, adapted to common heart diseases. It serves as an effective screening tool in cardiac clinical management by demonstrating strong psychometric properties.

土耳其版心脏窘迫量表与心脏窘迫量表简表:效度与信度研究。
目的:心梗后焦虑、抑郁、害怕心梗复发等负面情绪增加,使其难以遵守生活方式建议和药物治疗。对心脏窘迫进行筛查并确保适当转诊是病后保持健康生活方式的一个重要方面。心脏窘迫量表使评估心脏病患者的心理和情绪成为可能。本研究的目的是提供土耳其语原始形式心脏窘迫量表(CDI)和简短形式(CDI- sf)的有效性和可靠性评估。方法:对诊断为急性冠状动脉综合征而住院并自愿参加研究的417名受试者(336名CDI/81名CDI- sf)进行面对面问卷调查。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)、Rasch、验证性因子分析(CFA)评估效度,采用麦当劳ω (ω)评估信度,Pearson相关系数(ω)评估信度,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估可判别性。结果:两种CDI具有较高的信度。CDI的因子结构和因子负荷与原来的不兼容。效度(CFA-EFA)估计的拟合优度也未得到证实。RMSEA、χ2/df和CFI指数的值表明,该方法不适合用于 rkiye。然而,在对CDI-SF的跨文化适应、效度和信度研究中,我们发现CDI-SF的构念效度和内部一致性较高,可以作为一个单向度量表使用。该清单将免费提供给临床医生和研究人员。结论:CDI-SF提供了一种特殊、实用和可靠的心脏窘迫测量方法,适用于常见的心脏病。它通过展示强大的心理测量特性,作为心脏临床管理的有效筛选工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信