Sedation for stereotactic headframe application: a randomized comparison of two techniques.

W L Lanier, G J Hool, R J Faust, R F Cucchiara, P J Kelly
{"title":"Sedation for stereotactic headframe application: a randomized comparison of two techniques.","authors":"W L Lanier,&nbsp;G J Hool,&nbsp;R J Faust,&nbsp;R F Cucchiara,&nbsp;P J Kelly","doi":"10.1159/000100714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A prospective, randomized study was performed in 87 patients to compare the safety, efficacy and dose requirements of two sedation techniques for stereotactic headframe application. Sedation administration and headframe application averaged 30 min. Fifty patients weighing 76 +/- 13 kg (mean +/- SD) received mean doses of 154 micrograms fentanyl plus 5.5 mg droperidol i.v. (FD group). An additional 37 patients weighing 76 +/- 19 kg received mean doses of 127 micrograms fentanyl plus 6.7 mg Valium (diazepam; FV group). Both treatments provided excellent hemodynamic stability and a low incidence of adverse side effects while providing adequate analgesia and sedation. The incidence of anesthetist-assessed patient anxiety and discomfort was more favorable in the FD group.</p>","PeriodicalId":75525,"journal":{"name":"Applied neurophysiology","volume":"50 1-6","pages":"227-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000100714","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000100714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was performed in 87 patients to compare the safety, efficacy and dose requirements of two sedation techniques for stereotactic headframe application. Sedation administration and headframe application averaged 30 min. Fifty patients weighing 76 +/- 13 kg (mean +/- SD) received mean doses of 154 micrograms fentanyl plus 5.5 mg droperidol i.v. (FD group). An additional 37 patients weighing 76 +/- 19 kg received mean doses of 127 micrograms fentanyl plus 6.7 mg Valium (diazepam; FV group). Both treatments provided excellent hemodynamic stability and a low incidence of adverse side effects while providing adequate analgesia and sedation. The incidence of anesthetist-assessed patient anxiety and discomfort was more favorable in the FD group.

镇静用于立体定向头架应用:两种技术的随机比较。
对87例患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较两种镇静技术用于立体定向头架的安全性、有效性和剂量要求。镇静和头框应用平均30分钟。50例体重76 +/- 13 kg(平均+/- SD)的患者接受平均剂量154微克芬太尼加5.5 mg氟哌啶醇静脉注射(FD组)。另外37名体重76±19公斤的患者接受了平均剂量127微克芬太尼加6.7毫克安定(安定;阵线集团)。两种治疗方法均提供良好的血流动力学稳定性和低发生率的不良副作用,同时提供足够的镇痛和镇静。麻醉医师评估的患者焦虑和不适发生率在FD组更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信