Optimizing Federal Grants to Scale Up Evidence-Based Practices in Health and Social Services: Recommendations from Federal and State Agency Officials.

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01
Alex R Dopp, Blanche Wright, Jin Kim, Grace Hindmarch, Sarah B Hunter
{"title":"Optimizing Federal Grants to Scale Up Evidence-Based Practices in Health and Social Services: Recommendations from Federal and State Agency Officials.","authors":"Alex R Dopp, Blanche Wright, Jin Kim, Grace Hindmarch, Sarah B Hunter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Federal spending on evidence-based practices (EBPs) provides significant returns by offsetting billions of dollars in societal impacts each year. Practices are deemed evidence-based because they have demonstrated their effectiveness in addressing various social and health-related challenges. Federal agencies often invest in EBP delivery through discretionary grants, but there is limited guidance on how to optimize these grants to support large-scale EBP implementation. To address this gap, the authors held focus groups with federal and state agency officials (using the findings from ongoing RAND research to frame their discussions) to gather and synthesize their recommendations on how to optimize federal grantmaking for EBP implementation. With the focus group participants, the authors identified seven policy recommendations for federal officials to consider when designing, awarding, and executing grants for EBP implementation, including capacity-building in service delivery organizations to sustain EBPs after grant funding ends. The authors also present real-world case examples to illustrate how funding agencies have put each recommendation into practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"12 3","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federal spending on evidence-based practices (EBPs) provides significant returns by offsetting billions of dollars in societal impacts each year. Practices are deemed evidence-based because they have demonstrated their effectiveness in addressing various social and health-related challenges. Federal agencies often invest in EBP delivery through discretionary grants, but there is limited guidance on how to optimize these grants to support large-scale EBP implementation. To address this gap, the authors held focus groups with federal and state agency officials (using the findings from ongoing RAND research to frame their discussions) to gather and synthesize their recommendations on how to optimize federal grantmaking for EBP implementation. With the focus group participants, the authors identified seven policy recommendations for federal officials to consider when designing, awarding, and executing grants for EBP implementation, including capacity-building in service delivery organizations to sustain EBPs after grant funding ends. The authors also present real-world case examples to illustrate how funding agencies have put each recommendation into practice.

优化联邦拨款,扩大基于证据的卫生和社会服务实践:来自联邦和州机构官员的建议。
联邦政府在循证实践(ebp)上的支出每年抵消了数十亿美元的社会影响,带来了可观的回报。实践被认为是基于证据的,因为它们已证明在应对各种社会和健康方面的挑战方面有效。联邦机构经常通过酌情拨款投资于EBP交付,但是关于如何优化这些拨款以支持大规模EBP实施的指导有限。为了解决这一差距,作者与联邦和州机构官员举行了焦点小组会议(使用正在进行的兰德研究的结果来构建他们的讨论),以收集和综合他们关于如何优化联邦拨款以实施EBP的建议。与焦点小组参与者一起,作者确定了7项政策建议,供联邦官员在设计、授予和执行EBP实施的赠款时考虑,包括在赠款资金结束后服务提供组织的能力建设,以维持EBP。作者还提供了实际案例来说明资助机构如何将每项建议付诸实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信