The global scope and components of family-centred care for preterm infants: An umbrella review.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004900
Jacklyn Adella, Francesca Giulia Maraschin, Shobhana Nagraj
{"title":"The global scope and components of family-centred care for preterm infants: An umbrella review.","authors":"Jacklyn Adella, Francesca Giulia Maraschin, Shobhana Nagraj","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preterm birth is the leading cause of under-five mortality. Family-centred care (FCC) interventions may improve outcomes related to prematurity and may be used to address this issue to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. We aimed to consolidate the scope of evidence and components of FCC interventions for preterm infants globally and see its relevance for low-resource settings. We conducted an umbrella review informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Systematic literature reviews evaluating FCC in the preterm or high-risk infant population and their families were identified from six databases. Keywords included \"family-centred care\", \"premature infants\", \"neonatal intensive care unit\", and their relevant synonyms. Quality appraisal was conducted using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses and data extraction performed to an agreed table. Thematic analysis was carried out to categorise the components of FCC interventions. Forty-four reviews were included in the umbrella review. Outcomes were observed on the parents in 40 studies, the infant in 19, the health care provider in 13, and the health system in 7. Most studies focused on inpatient settings (79.6%) and were conducted primarily in high-income countries (92.3%). The components identified were general FCC, health system design, parent support, partnership in care, and information and communication. Overall, FCC interventions have a positive impact on parental, infant, and health system outcomes, with consistent reporting of FCC impact on parental well-being and satisfaction, infant length of stay, feeding and growth, and hospital readmission rates. FCC interventions have the potential to improve preterm infant health system outcomes. To maximise impact, FCC interventions need to be further explored in low-resource and post-discharge settings, where the burden of premature infant morbidity and mortality is highest. Evidence in both these settings is scarce. Future research efforts should aim to close these evidence gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0004900"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preterm birth is the leading cause of under-five mortality. Family-centred care (FCC) interventions may improve outcomes related to prematurity and may be used to address this issue to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. We aimed to consolidate the scope of evidence and components of FCC interventions for preterm infants globally and see its relevance for low-resource settings. We conducted an umbrella review informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Systematic literature reviews evaluating FCC in the preterm or high-risk infant population and their families were identified from six databases. Keywords included "family-centred care", "premature infants", "neonatal intensive care unit", and their relevant synonyms. Quality appraisal was conducted using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses and data extraction performed to an agreed table. Thematic analysis was carried out to categorise the components of FCC interventions. Forty-four reviews were included in the umbrella review. Outcomes were observed on the parents in 40 studies, the infant in 19, the health care provider in 13, and the health system in 7. Most studies focused on inpatient settings (79.6%) and were conducted primarily in high-income countries (92.3%). The components identified were general FCC, health system design, parent support, partnership in care, and information and communication. Overall, FCC interventions have a positive impact on parental, infant, and health system outcomes, with consistent reporting of FCC impact on parental well-being and satisfaction, infant length of stay, feeding and growth, and hospital readmission rates. FCC interventions have the potential to improve preterm infant health system outcomes. To maximise impact, FCC interventions need to be further explored in low-resource and post-discharge settings, where the burden of premature infant morbidity and mortality is highest. Evidence in both these settings is scarce. Future research efforts should aim to close these evidence gaps.

以家庭为中心的早产儿护理的全球范围和组成部分:概括性审查。
早产是五岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因。以家庭为中心的护理(FCC)干预措施可以改善与早产有关的结果,并可用于解决这一问题,以实现可持续发展目标。我们旨在整合全球早产儿FCC干预措施的证据范围和组成部分,并了解其与低资源环境的相关性。我们根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的指导方针进行了一项总括性审查。从6个数据库中对评价FCC在早产儿或高危婴儿人群及其家庭中的应用进行了系统的文献综述。关键词包括“以家庭为中心的护理”、“早产儿”、“新生儿重症监护病房”及其相关同义词。质量评估使用JBI系统评估和研究综合关键评估清单进行,并按照商定的表格进行数据提取。进行专题分析,对FCC干预措施的组成部分进行分类。总括性审查包括44项审查。40项研究对父母进行了观察,19项研究对婴儿进行了观察,13项研究对医疗保健提供者进行了观察,7项研究对卫生系统进行了观察。大多数研究集中在住院环境(79.6%),主要在高收入国家进行(92.3%)。确定的组成部分是一般FCC、卫生系统设计、家长支持、护理伙伴关系以及信息和通信。总体而言,FCC干预措施对父母、婴儿和卫生系统结果有积极影响,FCC对父母幸福感和满意度、婴儿住院时间、喂养和生长以及医院再入院率有一致的影响。FCC干预措施具有改善早产儿健康系统结果的潜力。为了最大限度地发挥作用,需要在低资源和出院后环境中进一步探索FCC干预措施,因为那里的早产儿发病率和死亡率负担最高。这两种情况的证据都很少。未来的研究工作应该致力于缩小这些证据差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信