Preliminary Implementation of a Dementia-Focused Risk Negotiation Conversation Tool Into Aged Care Practice.

IF 2.2
Claudia Meyer, Linda Schnitker, Arti Appannah, Kate Laver, Fleur O'Keefe, Judy Lowthian
{"title":"Preliminary Implementation of a Dementia-Focused Risk Negotiation Conversation Tool Into Aged Care Practice.","authors":"Claudia Meyer, Linda Schnitker, Arti Appannah, Kate Laver, Fleur O'Keefe, Judy Lowthian","doi":"10.1177/14713012251356007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A key principle of best practice dementia care is providing access to support for making, communicating and participating in decisions affecting a person's life, whether for day-to-day activities or more complex decisions. Implementing a fit-for-purpose tool into routine care has challenges and requires careful planning to ensure success and sustainability. This project aimed to utilise implementation science principles to embed a dementia-focused risk negotiation conversation tool (<i>Enabling Choices)</i>, into an Australian community aged care service. A mixed methods exploratory design was employed. Co-design workshops identified contextual barriers and enablers, and developed behaviour change strategies for implementation support. Following training to build knowledge and skills in <i>Enabling Choices</i>, community aged care workers were expected to use the tool three times over 4-months with people with dementia and care-partners. Two geographic regions received formal implementation support while another two did not. Implementation outcomes of feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness, reach and adoption, were evaluated via interviews and audit of clinical records. Contextual barriers and enablers were identified. Implementation strategies aligned with capability, opportunity and motivation for behaviour change. Training was delivered to 62 care managers who used the tool with people with dementia or care-partners (<i>n</i> = 31). Interview themes for care managers (across all regions) were (1) augmenting care; (2) flexible and supportive training; (3) articulating target audience; and (4) overcoming hesitancy. Interviews with people with dementia/care-partners provided further insights. Synthesised findings highlighted that implementation support was beneficial, and feasibility of <i>Enabling Choices</i> likely impacted reach and adoption. Implementation of <i>Enabling Choices</i> into routine community aged care practice offered valuable insights into the critical role of inner and outer contextual barriers and enablers. Sufficient attention on capability, opportunity and motivational components of behaviour change was important, with the link identified between acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, for reach and adoption of an innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251356007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251356007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key principle of best practice dementia care is providing access to support for making, communicating and participating in decisions affecting a person's life, whether for day-to-day activities or more complex decisions. Implementing a fit-for-purpose tool into routine care has challenges and requires careful planning to ensure success and sustainability. This project aimed to utilise implementation science principles to embed a dementia-focused risk negotiation conversation tool (Enabling Choices), into an Australian community aged care service. A mixed methods exploratory design was employed. Co-design workshops identified contextual barriers and enablers, and developed behaviour change strategies for implementation support. Following training to build knowledge and skills in Enabling Choices, community aged care workers were expected to use the tool three times over 4-months with people with dementia and care-partners. Two geographic regions received formal implementation support while another two did not. Implementation outcomes of feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness, reach and adoption, were evaluated via interviews and audit of clinical records. Contextual barriers and enablers were identified. Implementation strategies aligned with capability, opportunity and motivation for behaviour change. Training was delivered to 62 care managers who used the tool with people with dementia or care-partners (n = 31). Interview themes for care managers (across all regions) were (1) augmenting care; (2) flexible and supportive training; (3) articulating target audience; and (4) overcoming hesitancy. Interviews with people with dementia/care-partners provided further insights. Synthesised findings highlighted that implementation support was beneficial, and feasibility of Enabling Choices likely impacted reach and adoption. Implementation of Enabling Choices into routine community aged care practice offered valuable insights into the critical role of inner and outer contextual barriers and enablers. Sufficient attention on capability, opportunity and motivational components of behaviour change was important, with the link identified between acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, for reach and adoption of an innovation.

以失智症为焦点的风险协商对话工具在老年照护实务中的初步实施。
痴呆症护理最佳实践的一项关键原则是,为制定、沟通和参与影响患者生活的决策提供支持,无论是日常活动还是更复杂的决策。在日常护理中实施适合目的的工具具有挑战性,需要仔细规划以确保成功和可持续性。该项目旨在利用实施科学原则,将以痴呆症为重点的风险谈判对话工具(Enabling Choices)嵌入澳大利亚社区老年护理服务中。采用混合方法探索性设计。协同设计研讨会确定了上下文障碍和促成因素,并制定了支持实施的行为改变策略。社区老年护理工作者接受了“促进选择”的知识和技能培训后,预计将在4个月内与痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴一起使用该工具三次。两个地理区域得到了正式的执行支助,另外两个则没有。通过访谈和临床记录审核,评估实施结果的可行性、可接受性和适宜性、覆盖面和采用率。确定了上下文障碍和促成因素。与能力、机会和行为改变动机相一致的实施策略。对62名护理经理进行了培训,他们与痴呆症患者或护理伙伴一起使用该工具(n = 31)。所有地区护理经理的访谈主题为:(1)加强护理;(2)灵活、支持性培训;(3)明确目标受众;(4)克服犹豫。与痴呆症患者/护理伙伴的访谈提供了进一步的见解。综合调查结果强调,实施支持是有益的,而启用选择的可行性可能会影响范围和采用。在常规社区老年护理实践中实施使能选择为内部和外部环境障碍和使能因素的关键作用提供了有价值的见解。重要的是充分注意行为改变的能力、机会和动机组成部分,并确定可接受性、可行性和适当性之间的联系,以便达到和采用一项革新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信