Proposal of a Simpler Eye-Level Risk Model Incorporating Reticular Pseudodrusen for the Clinical Prediction of Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Matt Trinh, Annita Duong, Rene Cheung, Simon Chen, David Ng, Jeff Friedrich, Chris Hodge, Lisa Nivison-Smith, Angelica Ly
{"title":"Proposal of a Simpler Eye-Level Risk Model Incorporating Reticular Pseudodrusen for the Clinical Prediction of Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration.","authors":"Matt Trinh, Annita Duong, Rene Cheung, Simon Chen, David Ng, Jeff Friedrich, Chris Hodge, Lisa Nivison-Smith, Angelica Ly","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The updated simplified AREDS risk model predicts progression to late age-related macular degeneration (AMD) by person, describing up to nine observations across both eyes and 10 annual risk scores (0-4, with/without reticular pseudodrusen [RPD]). This study proposes an abridged model to enable inter-eye comparisons and potentially enhance clinical efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 269 participants with early/intermediate AMD over 7 years. The full, person-level updated simplified AREDS risk model was compared to eye-level candidate risk models, derived by removing the least predictive biomarkers. The main outcomes were prognostic performance (AUC) and risk score separability (χ<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1-3 years, the full model showed prognostic performance (AUC ± SE) up to 84.52% ± 5.93%, with overlap between most risk scores (χ<sup>2</sup> ≤ 2.08). Removing large drusen and pigmentary abnormalities in the fellow eye, intermediate drusen in both eyes, and redefining RPD presence as eye-specific maintained prognostic performance (up to 84.71% ± 4.72%). Assigning one point per retained biomarker, based on similar adjusted risks, improved risk score separability (χ<sup>2</sup> ≥ 3.85, p < 0.05) while reducing the number of annual scores from 10 to five.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The updated simplified AREDS risk model can be essentially halved without compromising prognostic performance by deriving eye-specific biomarkers and assigning one point per biomarker (large drusen, pigmentary abnormalities, and RPD in the primary eye, and late AMD in the fellow eye). This eye-level risk stratification may improve clinical efficiency and inter-eye study designs when one eye is of particular interest. An example of 3-year risks (scores 0-4) was ≈4%, 8%, 16%, 32%, and 64%.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The updated simplified AREDS risk model predicts progression to late age-related macular degeneration (AMD) by person, describing up to nine observations across both eyes and 10 annual risk scores (0-4, with/without reticular pseudodrusen [RPD]). This study proposes an abridged model to enable inter-eye comparisons and potentially enhance clinical efficiency.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 269 participants with early/intermediate AMD over 7 years. The full, person-level updated simplified AREDS risk model was compared to eye-level candidate risk models, derived by removing the least predictive biomarkers. The main outcomes were prognostic performance (AUC) and risk score separability (χ2).

Results: At 1-3 years, the full model showed prognostic performance (AUC ± SE) up to 84.52% ± 5.93%, with overlap between most risk scores (χ2 ≤ 2.08). Removing large drusen and pigmentary abnormalities in the fellow eye, intermediate drusen in both eyes, and redefining RPD presence as eye-specific maintained prognostic performance (up to 84.71% ± 4.72%). Assigning one point per retained biomarker, based on similar adjusted risks, improved risk score separability (χ2 ≥ 3.85, p < 0.05) while reducing the number of annual scores from 10 to five.

Conclusions: The updated simplified AREDS risk model can be essentially halved without compromising prognostic performance by deriving eye-specific biomarkers and assigning one point per biomarker (large drusen, pigmentary abnormalities, and RPD in the primary eye, and late AMD in the fellow eye). This eye-level risk stratification may improve clinical efficiency and inter-eye study designs when one eye is of particular interest. An example of 3-year risks (scores 0-4) was ≈4%, 8%, 16%, 32%, and 64%.

提出一种结合网状假性黄斑变性的简单眼位风险模型用于临床预测晚期黄斑变性。
背景:最新的简化AREDS风险模型预测人进展为晚期年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD),描述了双眼多达9个观察结果和10个年度风险评分(0-4,有/没有网状假性黄斑[RPD])。本研究提出了一个简化的模型,使眼间比较和潜在地提高临床效率。方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括269名早期/中期AMD患者,时间超过7年。将完整的、个人水平更新的简化AREDS风险模型与眼水平候选风险模型进行比较,候选风险模型是通过去除最不具预测性的生物标志物而得到的。主要预后指标为预后表现(AUC)和风险评分可分性(χ2)。结果:在1-3年时,全模型的预后表现(AUC±SE)高达84.52%±5.93%,大部分风险评分之间存在重叠(χ2≤2.08)。切除同侧眼的大结节和色素异常,双眼的中度结节,并将RPD的存在重新定义为眼部特异性,可维持预后(高达84.71%±4.72%)。结论:更新后的简化AREDS风险模型可以在不影响预后的情况下减半,方法是获得眼部特异性生物标志物,并为每个生物标志物(原眼大结节、色素异常、RPD和伴眼晚期AMD)分配1分。这种眼水平风险分层可以提高临床效率和眼间研究设计,当一只眼睛是特别感兴趣的。例如,3年风险(评分0-4)分别≈4%、8%、16%、32%和64%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信